Enabling IPSec panics stable/9 (runs OK on stable/8)

Hi, I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted). It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes: add 172.28.16.4 172.16.248.2 ah 15704 -A hmac-md5 "asdfgh"; add 17

BLESS YOUR HEART

Dearest In The Lord The time has come for Christians to worship God in spirit and in truth according to the book of John chapter 4:vs23-24.But the hour cometh and now is when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him . God i

Re: Enabling IPSec panics stable/9 (runs OK on stable/8)

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:46:03PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: >Hi, Hi. >I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits >before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted). >It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxe

Re: Enabling IPSec panics stable/9 (runs OK on stable/8)

Hi, On 01/04/12 15:51, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: I've just upgraded a 8-STABLE box to 9-STABLE (well, just few commits before it has been tagged as STABLE), which runs from NFS (pxebooted). It has some IPSec config in ipsec.conf, like this for several boxes: add 172.28.16.4 172.16

Re: BLESS YOUR HEART

you are right to say you won't be trusted because a lot of false prophets used the name of God to swindle honest and god fearing citizens. But judgement belongs only to him. How many people have you sent this scam mail? May God in his infinite mercy and compassion have forgive you if you are a s

RE: BLESS YOUR HEART

Please keep discussions like these away from the mailing list, it's not the right place for such. /Christoffer Persson From: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org] on behalf of Agnes Kanah [agnesm...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday

Re: Enabling IPSec panics stable/9 (runs OK on stable/8)

On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: [] >#7 0x809bf779 in ipsec_process_done (m=0xfe000c7c7a00, >isr=0xfe001bf54380) at >/data/usr/src/sys/netipsec/ipsec_output.c:170 > > Here seems to be the problem > Can you do the following (in th

Re: svn commit: r229497 - in stable/8/sys: conf modules modules/ipfw netinet/ipfw

After this change I am recieving the attached error log. On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:20:56PM +, John Baldwin wrote: > Author: jhb > Date: Wed Jan 4 16:20:55 2012 > New Revision: 229497 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/229497 > > Log: > MFC 225518,225793,227085: > Allow the ip

Re: svn commit: r229497 - in stable/8/sys: conf modules modules/ipfw netinet/ipfw

On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote: > > After this change I am recieving the attached error log. My fault, looks like stable/8 doesn't have WITH_INET / WITHOUT_INET. I'm doing tests on a fix now. > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 04:20:56PM +, John Baldwin wrote: > > A

Re: svn commit: r229497 - in stable/8/sys: conf modules modules/ipfw netinet/ipfw

On 4. Jan 2012, at 18:01 , John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote: >> >> After this change I am recieving the attached error log. > > My fault, looks like stable/8 doesn't have WITH_INET / WITHOUT_INET. > I'm doing tests on a fix now. Alternative

Re: svn commit: r229497 - in stable/8/sys: conf modules modules/ipfw netinet/ipfw

On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:44 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On 4. Jan 2012, at 18:01 , John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote: > >> > >> After this change I am recieving the attached error log. > > > > My fault, looks like stable/8 doesn

Re: svn commit: r229497 - in stable/8/sys: conf modules modules/ipfw netinet/ipfw

On 4. Jan 2012, at 19:40 , John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:09:44 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On 4. Jan 2012, at 18:01 , John Baldwin wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 12:50:38 pm Jason Hellenthal wrote: After this change I am recieving the attached err

gmirror not synced

Hi all, I've noticed that the md5 hashes of a couple of files on a gmirror change when I recalculate the hashes. The output usually cycles between 2 hashes per file. I'm guessing this is because each calculation reads the file randomly from 1 of 2 component drives, and the files in question had a

REMAINDER: Call for FreeBSD Status Reports - 4Q/2011

Hello everybody, I'd like to remind you that only ca. 10 days have left to the status report submission deadline. Note that we have only received 4 entries so far. I guess most of the people's holidays have finished by now so I hope we will receive much more than that by January 15, 2012. Th

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

Hi, On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM, wrote: > Thanks. > > My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to > ensure expected behaviour. > Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle Server install ? If not, you should not have to tune the FreeBSD i

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking on [1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva= riable leaves it in the default configuration 'in the way the developers or= vendor wanted it for production'. This is by rule. However, i= nvariable the community or vendor for platfor

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

Hmm... No sure what happened there again. What I sent (pulled from my "Sent" folder... === Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking on Phoronix.com , Michael invariable leaves it in the default configuration 'in the way the developers or vendor wanted

Re: [releng_9 tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

Why not compare native builds to tinderbox? 2012/1/4 Dag-Erling Smørgrav > Garrett Cooper writes: > > That's not relevant to these errors. For some odd reason tinderbox > > takes 1-2 iterations to reach equilibrium when someone makes a data > > structure change, even a change to a header and C

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800 wrote: >Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking > on[1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva configuration 'in the way the > developers or production'. This is by rule. However, i poor > scores on be 'it should be tuned, is configur

Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server

On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:16 PM,   wrote: >> Thanks. >> >> My request for the person documenting the tunings also runs the benchmark to >> ensure expected behaviour. >> > Why should you have to tune anything ? Did you tune the Oracle

DNSSec on FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE causes CPU 100%

Greetings everyone, I was testing DNSSec resolution on BIND 9.8.1-P1 by adding the following options: options { ... dnssec-enable yes; dnssec-validation auto; ... }; Unfortunately immediately after named is restarted one CPU reaches 100% utilization. CPU: 30.1% user, 0.0% nice, 23.6% system,

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2012-01-04 21:24:08 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-04 21:24:08 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-01-04 21:24:08 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-04 21:25:01 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-04 21:25:01 - /usr/

[releng_9 tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2012-01-04 22:56:38 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-01-04 22:56:38 - starting RELENG_9 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2012-01-04 22:56:38 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-01-04 22:57:14 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-01-04 22:57:14 - /usr/bi