Hi folks,
I am trying to use mmap(2) with a hint address. Unfortunately, this address
seems to be ignored and I never manage to get the desired one, while it
seems to be free.
Here is my code (the same code on NetBSD and GNU/Linux returns the hint
address) :
8< --- >8
#include
#include
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> FreeBSD currently have very obscure, closed community. To get in touch, you
> need to subscribe to several mail lists, constantly read them, I've just
> found recently (my shame of course) in mail list that there is service (
> pub.allbs
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:51:43AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2011-Dec-19 22:27:49 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote:
> >Problem solved - it was indeed an endian thing.
> >The problem is that fsck uses a real_dev_bsize variable that is declared
> >long,
> >but the DIOCGSECTORSIZE ioctl takes an u
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream source
> says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I get my images
> from.
Checksums compared to what? How would you know what the correct
checksum
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:51 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>> As long as I have reliable checksums that match the what the upstream source
>> says is the real thing, it doesn't practically matter where I get my images
>> from.
>
> Check
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Release engineering for FreeBSD produces SHA256 checksums for all
> official releases. AFAIK though they're only in the announcement emails and
> not stored anywhere else.
> I can't speak for OpenBSD's release process.
> Tha
On Dec 20, 2011, at 1:01 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Alexander Yerenkow
> wrote:
>> FreeBSD currently have very obscure, closed community. To get in touch, you
>> need to subscribe to several mail lists, constantly read them, I've just
>> found recently (my s
On 16/12/2011 16:28, Ian Smith wrote:
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> It seems something broke with the battery display. Last night it
> showed 94% remaining capacity for more than 2 hours.
>
> Afterwards I docked the machine (HP6510b) and rebooted it. Since then
> mor
on 20/12/2011 10:08 Ganael LAPLANCHE said the following:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am trying to use mmap(2) with a hint address. Unfortunately, this address
> seems to be ignored and I never manage to get the desired one, while it
> seems to be free.
[snip]
> Using MAP_FIXED, I can get the desired address
On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
shown message below.
On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
and installation works fine.
Since I update the box from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-PRE last night, cleaning
up all ports and having them rebu
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 09:08:18 Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am trying to use mmap(2) with a hint address. Unfortunately, this address
> seems to be ignored and I never manage to get the desired one, while it
> seems to be free.
>
> Here is my code (the same code on NetBSD and G
Hi,
It seems (from my own csup's and cvswe.cgi) that the src commits are lost,
starting with r228697 Sun Dec 18 22:04:55 2011)
What is going on (or off) ?
Claude Buisson
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
On 12/20/11 11:13, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
> shown message below.
> On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
> and installation works fine.
>
> Since I update the box from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-PRE last
On 12/20/2011 11:13, O. Hartmann wrote:
On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
shown message below.
On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
and installation works fine.
Since I update the box from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-PRE last night,
On 12/20/11 11:49, Michiel Boland wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 11:13, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On a freshly updated box the installation of x11/sessreg fails with the
>> shown message below.
>> On all boxes I run with FBSD 9 or 10 (all amd64, CLANG build) the build
>> and installation works fine.
>>
>> Sinc
Hi Andriy, Hi Tijl,
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:10:47 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote
> Can the following code explain what you are seeing?
> [...]
Yes, for sure. I had seen this part of the code but, to be honest, had
not understood the meaning of this computation.
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:10:26 +0100, Tijl
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:02:01 +0100 (CET), Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote
> But there is still something I don't understand : on the Linux
> machine where I ran my test program, the current RLIMIT_DATA
> is set to 0x/0x and I can manage to mmap at
> address 0x2000. If I set the same
on 20/12/2011 16:31 Ganael LAPLANCHE said the following:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:02:01 +0100 (CET), Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote
>
>> But there is still something I don't understand : on the Linux
>> machine where I ran my test program, the current RLIMIT_DATA
>> is set to 0x/0x and I
On 20. Dec 2011, at 10:01 , Claude Buisson wrote:
> It seems (from my own csup's and cvswe.cgi) that the src commits are lost,
> starting with r228697 Sun Dec 18 22:04:55 2011)
>
> What is going on (or off) ?
Re $subject -- yes. It will be worked on.
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
Hello,
Looks like tar -xf with zip archive is broken on 9.0. It creates the
directories but files are empty.
See with nagios-checker firefox plugin (.xpi which is a zip file)
http://code.google.com/p/nagioschecker/downloads/detail?name=nagioschecker-0.16.xpi&can=2&q=
total 20
drwxr-xr-x 4 patr
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:03:03 +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote
> Just a guess - this might be some sort of optimization to keep
> virtual address range of dynamic allocations untouched by
> unrelated mmap calls. Not sure if that's so and how useful
> could that be. svn log / svn annotate of the file m
Hi,
since a few days i have trubles on one server when running the daily amanda
backup. This was running fine since over 6 Month and now dump, called by
amanda, always returns:
FAIL dumper localhost.sbg.kmjeuro.com mirror/CTSs1d 20111219230324 0 [dump
(16603) /sbin/dump returned 1]
sendbacku
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 11:10:34 +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 16/12/2011 16:28, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > > It seems something broke with the battery display. Last night it
> > > showed 94% remaining capacity for more than 2 hours.
> > >
>
I have recently been able to get the new build cluster on pointyhat-west
set up to run full builds of ports with clang on amd64-9. I have documented
the latest results on the wiki:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang
If you are interested in working on ports being built via clang, this
is yo
On Tuesday 20 December 2011 15:31:48 Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:02:01 +0100 (CET), Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote
>> But there is still something I don't understand : on the Linux
>> machine where I ran my test program, the current RLIMIT_DATA
>> is set to 0x/0x and I
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/12/2011 16:31 Ganael LAPLANCHE said the following:
>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:02:01 +0100 (CET), Ganael LAPLANCHE wrote
>>
>>> But there is still something I don't understand : on the Linux
>>> machine where I ran my test program, th
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:48:33AM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:51:43AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> > On 2011-Dec-19 22:27:49 +0100, Michiel Boland wrote:
> > >Problem solved - it was indeed an endian thing.
> > >The problem is that fsck uses a real_dev_bsize variabl
On 20.12.2011 16:41, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Looks like tar -xf with zip archive is broken on 9.0. It creates the
> directories but files are empty.
>
> See with nagios-checker firefox plugin (.xpi which is a zip file)
> http://code.google.com/p/nagioschecker/downloads/detail?name=na
Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offered an alternative
benchmark; and while (again, arguably rightly) it is important to
benchmark real world performance, equally, nobody has offered any
numbers in relation to, for
On 12/20/11 21:20, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
> criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offered an alternative
> benchmark; and while (again, arguably rightly) it is important to
> benchmark real world performance, equally,
http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
and Solaris. Steps to reproduce these benchmarks provided.
Sam
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> Interestingly,
On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
> http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
>
> PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
> and Solaris. Steps to reproduce these benchmarks provided.
>
> Sam
>
> On Tue, Dec 20
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:23PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
> > http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
> >
> > PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
> > and Solaris. Ste
Bottom post this time to follow Oliver :).
On 12/20/2011 02:54 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on FreeBSD, DragonFly, Linux
and S
On 12/21/11 00:29, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:54:23PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 12/20/11 22:45, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
>>> http://www.osnews.com/story/25334/DragonFly_BSD_MP_Performance_Significantly_Improved
>>>
>>> PostgreSQL tests, see the linked PDF for #'s on Fr
For such a system, the greatest immediate value would be to attempt to
reproduce the benchmarks in question.
Install PTS from www.phoronix-test-suite.com or freshports.org.
Run the benchmark against those used in the article
phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1112113-AR-ORACLELIN37
You will be
Is there a specific version of the test suite that should be used, to
compare against the published results?
Adrian
On 20 December 2011 17:18, Matthew Tippett wrote:
> For such a system, the greatest immediate value would be to attempt to
> reproduce the benchmarks in question.
>
> Install PTS
The benchmarks themselves are versioned. So in general most of the
av= ailable versions of PTS itself should be fine. PTS can be
considered = an execution shell that doesn't affect the benchmark
itself.
Note th= at you'll download a pile of the benchmarks, build and
install the
Any version is fine that's PTS 3.0 or newer in terms of being
compatible, since the test profiles are versioned separately and
automatically fetched to match the result file. However, I'd recommended
the newest (PTS 3.6) as it contains the best FreeBSD support at present
in terms of hardware/so
On 12/20/2011 02:01, Claude Buisson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems (from my own csup's and cvswe.cgi) that the src commits are lost,
> starting with r228697 Sun Dec 18 22:04:55 2011)
Yeah, my warning 2 days ago that this was going to happen seems to have
gone un-heeded. :) I'm sure you can take bz' w
[performance@ & current@ ccs trimmed, I'm not subscribed. Feel free ..]
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
> 2011/12/19 Lev Serebryakov :
> > Hello, Samuel.
> > You wrote 15 ÿÿ 2011 ÿÿ., 16:32:47:
> >
> >> Other benchmarks in the Phoronix suite and their representations
On 12/20/2011 11:22 PM, Ian Smith wrote:
[performance@ & current@ ccs trimmed, I'm not subscribed. Feel free ..]
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011, Samuel J. Greear wrote:
> 2011/12/19 Lev Serebryakov [1]:
> > Hello, Samuel.
> > You wrote 15 ÿÿ 2011 ÿÿ., 16:32:47:
> >
> >> Other benchmark
Am 21.12.2011 06:22, schrieb Ian Smith:
> I find the results on this page very strange, but perhaps indicative:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=debian_kfreebsd_h210&num=1
>
> Here we see scant difference in results between Debian running FreeBSD
> 7.3 or 8.0 or Linux 2.6.3
43 matches
Mail list logo
