Re: em0 watchdog timeout

On 2011-11-10 23:25, Joshua Boyd wrote: On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Willem Jan Withagen mailto:w...@digiware.nl>> wrote: em0@pci0:0:25:0:class=0x02 card=0x10bd15d9 chip=0x10bd8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Intel 8256

Building servers this weekend. Recommendations?

I need to build up some new servers this weekend, and my first choice for the OS would be FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 if it were available. Alas, it isn't, and there's no sign of when it's coming (neither the Release Engineering page or the Wiki is anywhere near up to date). RC1 has a few bugs that I'd lik

Re: em0 watchdog timeout

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > On 2011-11-10 23:25, Joshua Boyd wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Willem Jan Withagen > > wrote: >> >>em0@pci0:0:25:0:class=0x02 card=0x10bd15d9 >>chip=0x10bd8086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x

Re: Building servers this weekend. Recommendations?

On 13/11/2011 18:51, Brett Glass wrote: > I need to build up some new servers this weekend, and my first choice > for the OS would be FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 if it were available. Alas, it > isn't, and there's no sign of when it's coming (neither the Release > Engineering page or the Wiki is anywhere near

Re: Building servers this weekend. Recommendations?

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 07:24:51PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 13/11/2011 18:51, Brett Glass wrote: > > I need to build up some new servers this weekend, and my first choice > > for the OS would be FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 if it were available. Alas, it > > isn't, and there's no sign of when it's co

Re: Building servers this weekend. Recommendations?

> Don't know why you would go with 9.0 on a new server I understand what you're saying: normally, we wouldn't use a .0 release in production. But there's a problem. 8.2-RELEASE has serious networking bugs that would cause the servers to lock up. It also has a few other problems (e.g. in timeke