On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 08:06:50PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
> I suspect something is making those threads loop, but I don't know how
> to figure out where? (In the bad old days, I would have exscaped to a
> debugger and looked where the program counter was, then repeated after
> a "cont" a few
2011/9/27 crsnet.pl :
>> Hi,
>
> Hello, thanks for reply.
>>
>> Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
>> build your wifi support as a module.)
>> Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
>>
> First i make kldunload if_iwn.
> When i try to suspend f
22.09.2011 09:10, Konstantin V. Krotov пишет:
21.09.2011 23:48, Andriy Gapon пишет:
on 21/09/2011 15:04 Konstantin V. Krotov said the following:
hello.
i'm have on fbsd RELENG_8 pci-e card with 1 rs-232 port.
and this card don't support.
(after patch)
pciconf -lv
puc0@pci0:5:0:0: class=0x07000
Hm, it's not all that useful. But it first calls dlopen(). Does it
have shared modules? Do you have old copies of those somewhere lying
around?
Adrian
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
T
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 09:09:30PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hm, it's not all that useful. But it first calls dlopen(). Does it
> have shared modules? Do you have old copies of those somewhere lying
> around?
You need to build everything, i.e. base and the port, build with debug
symbols. Otherw
Hi list,
I upgraded today kernel and world from fresh sources on my 8-stable amd64
system.
I upgraded ports as well. After that both firefox and chromium do not see
linux-f10-flashplugin.
I reinstalled manually emulators/linux_base-f10, www/nspluginwrapper and
www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 and d
On 28.09.2011 16:25, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I upgraded today kernel and world from fresh sources on my 8-stable amd64
> system.
> I upgraded ports as well. After that both firefox and chromium do not see
> linux-f10-flashplugin.
> I reinstalled manually emulators/linux_base-f10, ww
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, S.N.Grigoriev
wrote:
> All browsers still treat the flash plugin as missing.
> What may be wrong?
try nspluginwrapper -v -a -u
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:25:17 +0400
"S.N.Grigoriev" wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I upgraded today kernel and world from fresh sources on my 8-stable
> amd64 system. I upgraded ports as well. After that both firefox and
> chromium do not see linux-f10-flashplugin. I reinstalled manually
> emulators/linu
28.09.2011, 19:42, "Conrad J. Sabatier" :
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 18:25:17 +0400
> "S.N.Grigoriev" wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I upgraded today kernel and world from fresh sources on my 8-stable
>> amd64 system. I upgraded ports as well. After that both firefox and
>> chromium do not see linux
28.09.2011, 18:59, "Thomas Steen Rasmussen" :
> On 28.09.2011 16:25, S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I upgraded today kernel and world from fresh sources on my 8-stable amd64
>> system.
>> I upgraded ports as well. After that both firefox and chromium do not see
>> linux-f10-flashp
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 19:59:43 +0400
"S.N.Grigoriev" wrote:
>
> Hi Conrad,
>
> after manual reinstalling as described above 'npconfig -l' output is:
>
> /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
> Original
> plugin: /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-f10-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
>
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:50:08 -0500
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>
> It was a while ago that I did the actual wrapper install, but if I
> remember right, I simply copied npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
> from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins to /home/conrads/.mozilla/plugins.
> You may want to try doing
At Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:59:39 +0200,
Thomas Steen Rasmussen wrote:
> Please see
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-gecko/2011-September/001840.html
That post is not the case for the OP:
- peculiar to firefox-7 implementation. He runs chromium.
- wrapped linux-f10-flashplugin in $HOME/.moz
28.09.2011, 21:10, "Conrad J. Sabatier" :
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 11:50:08 -0500
> "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
>
>> It was a while ago that I did the actual wrapper install, but if I
>> remember right, I simply copied npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
>> from /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins to /home/c
Hi everyone,
Today I upgraded one of my servers from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-BETA3. I
noticed that after the upgrade portsnap does not fetch Index-9 and I
had to manually issue the "make fetchindex" command. I remember that
this was something I had to do when I was running 9-CURRENT a few
months ago in
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:36:13 +0200, George Kontostanos
wrote:
Hi everyone,
Today I upgraded one of my servers from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-BETA3. I
noticed that after the upgrade portsnap does not fetch Index-9 and I
had to manually issue the "make fetchindex" command. I remember that
this was som
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Ronald Klop
wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:36:13 +0200, George Kontostanos
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Today I upgraded one of my servers from 8.2-STABLE to 9.0-BETA3. I
>> noticed that after the upgrade portsnap does not fetch Index-9 and I
>> had to manual
The third BETA build of the 9.0-RELEASE release cycle is now
available. Since this is the first release of a brand new branch
I cross-post the announcements on both -current and -stable. But
just so you know most of the developers active in head pay more
attention to the -current mailing list.
On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 21:42 -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> If you would like to use csup/cvsup mechanisms to access the source
> tree the branch tag to use is now "RELENG_8", if you use "." (head)
> you will get 10-CURRENT.
Sigh. Sorry. It's late...
RELENG_9...
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
