On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
> Don't get why all these references for time are popping up here and why
> everyone seems to think that would make the PATH variable get cut short
> from the environment that newvers.sh is running in, but see the post I
> made to the real
Hi,
we are running an NFS server (8.2-STABLE/amd64 from 2011-09-08) with
several 8.1-RELEASE-p1/amd64 clients (webservers). After updating the
server, we now realize a slight increase in udp datagrams "dropped due
to full socket buffers", which wasn't the case in the previously
installed 8.2-
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Does this fix it ?
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/154954
Possibly. As I stated earlier, I can't reproduce the problem from ZFS
repo/sup snapshot I beleived I should.
On the second look, this particular change barely can fix my part
Robert Schulze wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we are running an NFS server (8.2-STABLE/amd64 from 2011-09-08) with
> several 8.1-RELEASE-p1/amd64 clients (webservers). After updating the
> server, we now realize a slight increase in udp datagrams "dropped due
> to full socket buffers", which wasn't the case in
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 11:45:25AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> 16.09.2011 02:19, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 02:02:37AM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> >> 16.09.2011 01:15, YongHyeon PYUN пишет:
> >>
> >>> I remember re(4) in 6.x also have a couple of bus_dma(9) bugs. How
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:26:46PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> > Don't get why all these references for time are popping up here and why
> > everyone seems to think that would make the PATH variable get cut short
> > from the environme
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 01:38:31AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:26:46PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > >
> > > Don't get why all these references for time are popping up here and why
> > > everyone see
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 01:38:31AM -0400, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:26:46PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> > >
> > > Don't get why all these references for time are popping up here and why
> > > everyone seems