Welcome
I installed freebsd 9bata1 and noticed the installer does not create a
user account's home directory.
Have to manually create after installation.
Greet
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
Hello *,
I'll just add a 'me too'. Had not posted to the list
because I wasn't sure if it wasn't because of me :-)
Best regards,
Holger
Am 22.08.2011 um 09:26 schrieb Yampress:
> Welcome
> I installed freebsd 9bata1 and noticed the installer does not create a user
> account's home directory.
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:20:33AM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 09:44:41PM +0100, David Wood wrote:
>
> > I wrote and contributed the support code for the OXPCIe95x serial chips
> > - and just happened to notice your report.
>
> Thanks for the response.
>
>
> > In mess
Hi Greg,
In message <20110822083336.gi92...@core.byshenk.net>, Greg Byshenk
writes
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:20:33AM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote:
puc0: mem
0xf9dfc000-0xf9df,0xfa00-0xfa1f,0xf9e0-0xf9ff irq
30 at device 0.0 on pci4
puc0: 2 UARTs detected
uart2: <16950 or
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:23:14AM +0100, David Wood wrote:
> In message <20110822083336.gi92...@core.byshenk.net>, Greg Byshenk
> writes
> >On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:20:33AM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote:
> >>puc0: mem
> >>0xf9dfc000-0xf9df,0xfa00-0xfa1f,0xf9e0-0xf9ff irq
>
Dear Greg,
In message <20110822094756.gj92...@core.byshenk.net>, Greg Byshenk
writes
It doesn't seem to matter; both cuau?.lock and cuau?.init produce the
error (for both ports), and cuau? itself remains a no-op.
You could try
hint.uart.2.baud="115200"
in /boot/device.hints - making the rel
On 18/08/2011 11:55, Yuri wrote:
On 08/18/2011 02:17, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The below advice still applies. Do not skim the page, read it.
http://ivoras.net/blog/tree/2011-01-01.freebsd-on-4k-sector-drives.html
You will therefore have to go through some manual rigmarole (preferably
with gpart
On 19/08/2011 03:28, Yuri wrote:
Following instructions here
(http://ivoras.net/blog/tree/2011-01-01.freebsd-on-4k-sector-drives.html) I
destroyed my previous ZFS pool with 512 byte sectors and did this:
gnop create -S 4096 /dev/ad4
zpool create mypool /dev/ad4.nop
zpol create mypool/mydir
zpool
On 2011-Aug-18 12:16:44 +0400, "Alexander V. Chernikov"
wrote:
>The code should look like this:
...
>(move pages recalculation before b-list check)
I notice a very similar patch has been applied to -current as r225076.
For the archives, I've done some testing with this patch on a Sun V890
with
The limitation was ONLY due to a *minor* 32-bit integer overflow in one
or two *intermediate* calculations in the radix tree code, which I
long ago fixed in DragonFly.
Just find the changes in the DFly codebase and determine if they need
to be applied.
The swap space radix
10 matches
Mail list logo
