On 10.08.2011 19:16, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Aug 9, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
I am trying to set up 64GB partitions for swap for a system that
has 64GB of RAM (with the idea to dump kernel core etc). But, on
8-stable as of today I get:
WARNING: reduc
WD has sectors of the size 4kB in their latest hard drives, which is
different from the traditional 512B.
http://www.wdc.com/advformat
http://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5655
These articles assert that something special should be done in OS to
enable high performance of such drives
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:47:26AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> WD has sectors of the size 4kB in their latest hard drives, which is
> different from the traditional 512B.
> http://www.wdc.com/advformat
> http://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5655
>
> These articles assert that something special
on 18/08/2011 02:15 Steven Hartland said the following:
> - Original Message - From: "Andriy Gapon"
>
>> Thanks to the debug that Steven provided and to the help that I received from
>> Kostik, I think that now I understand the basic mechanics of this panic, but,
>> unfortunately, not the
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Yuri wrote:
> WD has sectors of the size 4kB in their latest hard drives, which is
> different from the traditional 512B.
> http://www.wdc.com/advformat
> http://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5655
>
> These articles assert that something special sho
On 08/18/2011 02:17, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
The below advice still applies. Do not skim the page, read it.
http://ivoras.net/blog/tree/2011-01-01.freebsd-on-4k-sector-drives.html
You will therefore have to go through some manual rigmarole (preferably
with gpart(8)) to ensure performance. If y
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:47:26AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> WD has sectors of the size 4kB in their latest hard drives, which is
> different from the traditional 512B.
> http://www.wdc.com/advformat
> http://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5655
>
> These articles assert that something specia
- Original Message -
From: "Andriy Gapon"
Thats interesting, are you using http as an example or is that something thats
been gleaned from the debugging of our output? I ask as there's only one process
running in each of our jails and thats a single java process.
It's from the debug d
on 18/08/2011 13:35 Steven Hartland said the following:
> - Original Message - From: "Andriy Gapon"
>>> Thats interesting, are you using http as an example or is that something
>>> thats
>>> been gleaned from the debugging of our output? I ask as there's only one
>>> process
>>> running
- Original Message -
From: "Andriy Gapon"
Probably I have mistakenly assumed that the 'prison' in prison_derefer() has
something to do with an actual jail, while it could have been just prison0 where
all non-jailed processes belong.
That makes sense as this particular panic was cause
Artem Belevich wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Miroslav Lachman<000.f...@quip.cz> wrote:
Thank you guys, you are right. The BIOS provides only 1 disk to the loader!
I checked it from loader prompt by lsdev (booted from USB external HDD).
So I will try to make a small zpool mirror for
on 18/08/2011 14:11 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> Probably I have mistakenly assumed that the 'prison' in prison_derefer() has
> something to do with an actual jail, while it could have been just prison0
> where
> all non-jailed processes belong.
So, indeed:
(kgdb) p $2->p_ucred->cr_prison
$
on 12/08/2011 22:59 Andrew Boyer said the following:
> Re: panic: bufwrite: buffer is not busy??? (originally on freebsd-net)
>
> Re: debugging frequent kernel panics on 8.2-RELEASE (originally on
> freebsd-stable)
>
> Re: System hang in USB umass module while processing panic (originally on
>
on 17/08/2011 23:21 Andriy Gapon said the following:
It seems like everything starts with some kind of a race between terminating
processes in a jail and termination of the jail itself. This is where the
details are very thin so far. What we see is that a process (http) is in
exit(2) syscall, i
2011/8/18 Andriy Gapon :
> on 17/08/2011 23:21 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>
>> It seems like everything starts with some kind of a race between
>> terminating
>> processes in a jail and termination of the jail itself. This is where the
>> details are very thin so far. What we see is that a
On Thursday 18 August 2011 19:04:10 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> If you can help Hans to figure out what you is wrong with USB subsystem in
> this respect that would help us all.
Hi,
usb_busdma.c: /* we use "mtx_owned()" instead of this function */
usb_busdma.c: owned = mtx_owned(uptag->mtx);
usb_co
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 01:47:26AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
>> WD has sectors of the size 4kB in their latest hard drives, which is
>> different from the traditional 512B.
>> http://www.wdc.com/advformat
>> http://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers/det
Chip Camden wrote
in <20110818025550.ga1...@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>:
st> Quoth Attilio Rao on Thursday, 18 August 2011:
st> > In callout_cpu_switch() if a low priority thread is migrating the
st> > callout and gets preempted after the outcoming cpu queue lock is left
st> > (and sched
Quoth Hiroki Sato on Friday, 19 August 2011:
> Chip Camden wrote
> in <20110818025550.ga1...@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>:
>
> st> Quoth Attilio Rao on Thursday, 18 August 2011:
> st> > In callout_cpu_switch() if a low priority thread is migrating the
> st> > callout and gets preempted af
Following instructions here
(http://ivoras.net/blog/tree/2011-01-01.freebsd-on-4k-sector-drives.html) I
destroyed my previous ZFS pool with 512 byte sectors and did this:
gnop create -S 4096 /dev/ad4
zpool create mypool /dev/ad4.nop
zpol create mypool/mydir
zpool export mypool
gnop destroy /dev/
Howdy,
I have some high-traffic squid servers, most of which are running a
flavor of RELENG_7 very successfully, but one that I've been evaluating
8.x on has had a lot of problems. Most recently we had the crash below
twice in the last 2 weeks. Same exact backtrace. Any suggestions on
where t
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 07:36:50PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have some high-traffic squid servers, most of which are running a
> flavor of RELENG_7 very successfully, but one that I've been
> evaluating 8.x on has had a lot of problems. Most recently we had
> the crash below twice i
On 19.08.2011 3:11, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I'd strongly suggest avoiding fdisk(8) and using gpart(8) on 8 and
> above. It has an
> alignment option that makes this all just work and also allows the use of GPT
> formatting. (Watch out for GPT on any system that needs to run 32-bit
> Windows.)
>
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
