Re: dtrace ustack kernel panic

2011-08-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/08/2011 01:39 maestro something said the following: > hm userland and CTF not that I know. I only recompiled the kernel with CTF. > Do I > have to recompile userland (and would that be make world?) If so can i just > pass > the same WITH_CTF=1 option to make? I _think_ (as in: not sure) th

Re: dtrace ustack kernel panic

2011-08-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/08/2011 01:46 maestro something said the following: > What do I have to recompile for the patch to be picked up? > make libproc in /usr/src/lib Correct way is: $ cd /usr/src/lib/libproc $ make obj $ make depend $ make $ make install -- Andriy Gapon _

Re: dtrace ustack kernel panic

2011-08-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/08/2011 03:47 maestro something said the following: > now it seems that the ustack() action on i386 and FreeBSD-9.0BETA1 almost > works. > > Almost because dtrace still exits (this time without an error message) The > process for which the ustack should be genereated is terminated > Here ar

Re: dtrace ustack kernel panic

2011-08-03 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 03/08/2011 11:42 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 03/08/2011 03:47 maestro something said the following: >> now it seems that the ustack() action on i386 and FreeBSD-9.0BETA1 almost >> works. >> >> Almost because dtrace still exits (this time without an error message) The >> process for wh

Re: 9.0 B1 Panic

2011-08-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:11:58 pm Martin Wilke wrote: > > On Aug 3, 2011, at 12:56 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:58:10 am Martin Wilke wrote: > >> > >> On Aug 2, 2011, at 6:58 PM, Lystopad Olexandr wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, Martin Wilke! > >>> > >>> On Tue, Au