Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 02:39:28AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > IIRC, Plextor (and maybe some others) had a switch to select 512 or
> > 2048 as the default transfer size, precisely so that they could be
> > used as boot devices with systems that supported only
Am 19.07.2011 20:17, schrieb Artem Belevich:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:31 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> The only reason it might be nice to stick with two fields is due to the line
>> length (though the first line is over 80 cols even in the current format).
>> Here
>> are two possible suggestion
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> The "Rev" column is required for of devices that are not uniquely
> identified by their Vnd/Dev-IDs. (These used to exist, e.g. the Symbios
> SCSI controllers, though I'm not aware of any device that needed a
> different driver dependi
On Jul 20, 2011, at 3:54 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
>
> This is a very good idea, IMHO.
>
> When I committed pciconf back in 1996 (it had been contributed by
> gwollman) for PCI 1.0 (at a time when their was no standard for PCI to
> PCI brigdes, yet ;-) ), the current format seemed sensible, but the
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:54:06AM +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 19.07.2011 20:17, schrieb Artem Belevich:
> > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 6:31 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> The only reason it might be nice to stick with two fields is due to the
> >> line
> >> length (though the first line is over 8
Am 20.07.2011 18:11, schrieb Scott Long:
> On Jul 20, 2011, at 3:54 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
>>
>> This is a very good idea, IMHO.
>>
>> When I committed pciconf back in 1996 (it had been contributed by
>> gwollman) for PCI 1.0 (at a time when their was no standard for PCI to
>> PCI brigdes, yet ;-)
On 20.07.2011 18:25, YongHyeon PYUN wrote:
>> The "Rev" column is required for of devices that are not uniquely
>> identified by their Vnd/Dev-IDs. (These used to exist, e.g. the Symbios
>> SCSI controllers, though I'm not aware of any device that needed a
>> different driver depending on the PCI r
On Tuesday 19 July 2011 07:20 am, Callum Gibson wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just noticed and tracked down a regression in
> x86/cpufreq/powernow.c (on amd64) which was first mentioned here:
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-March/02350
>9.html
>
> although no followup seems to hav
On 20Jul11 19:28, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
}From your dmesg output, I see that the processor speed was not
}calibrated properly. ML-40's max. core freq. is 2,200 MHz according
}to its specification but it was probed at 2,282 MHz, which is too
}high. I think that's the problem. Can you please try th
