On 1 June 2011 17:37, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 02:34:55PM +0800, TJ Varghese wrote:
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Freddie Cash
> wrote:
>
[snip]
> > > SuperMicro AOC-USAS2-L8i works exceptionally well. These are 8-port
> HBAs
> > > using the LSI1068 chipset, s
Hi all,
as yesterday was a bank holiday in Germany I wasn't in the office to
try the patch linked in the email.
Is it consent that I should try the patch located here:
>>>
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/ata/chipsets/ata-intel.c.diff?r1=1.25;r2=1.26
and report the result? Or do
Hi.
Holger Kipp wrote:
> as yesterday was a bank holiday in Germany I wasn't in the office to
> try the patch linked in the email.
> Is it consent that I should try the patch located here:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/ata/chipsets/ata-intel.c.diff?r1=1.25;r2=1.26
>
> and
Dear John and FreeBSD friends,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:01:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, May 30, 2011 5:25:14 am Willy Offermans wrote:
> > Hello John and FreeBSD friends,
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:43:34AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Friday, May 27, 2011 10:38:02
On Friday, June 03, 2011 8:34:54 am Willy Offermans wrote:
> Dear John and FreeBSD friends,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:01:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, May 30, 2011 5:25:14 am Willy Offermans wrote:
> > > Hello John and FreeBSD friends,
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:
I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value.
If, yes, I am very interested to learn about your usecase for it.
I think that the default kdb behavior is the correct one, so it doesn't make
sense
to have a knob to turn on incorrect behavior.
But I may be missing something obvious
Decided to apply the patch proposed in -current by Mikolaj Golub:
http://people.freebsd.org/~trociny/uipc_socket.c.patch
This apparently fixed my issue as well. Running without checksums for a
full bonnie++ run (~100GB write/rewrite) produced no disconnects, no
stalls and generated up to 280MB
On 06/03/11 10:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value.
If, yes, I am very interested to learn about your usecase for it.
I think that the default kdb behavior is the correct one, so it doesn't make
sense
to have a knob to turn on incorrect behavio
on 03/06/2011 18:28 Nathan Whitehorn said the following:
> On 06/03/11 10:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value.
>> If, yes, I am very interested to learn about your usecase for it.
>>
>> I think that the default kdb behavior is the correct one,
Well, apparently my HAST joy was short. On a second run, I got stuck with
Jun 3 19:08:16 b1a hastd[1900]: [data2] (primary) Unable to receive
reply header: Operation timed out.
on the primary. No messages on the secondary.
On primary:
# netstat -an | grep 8457
tcp4 0 0 10.2.101.
On 3 Jun 2011, at 16:13, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I wonder if anybody uses kdb_stop_cpus with non-default value.
> If, yes, I am very interested to learn about your usecase for it.
The issue that prompted the sysctl was non-NMI IPIs being used to enter the
debugger or reboot following a core hangi
Hello,
Anyone tried Realtek 8111e on 8.2-RELEASE? Realtek8111e should be supported,
but I got following message:
re0: port
0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfdfff000-0xfdff,
0xfdff8000-0xfdffbfff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2
re0: Using 1 MSI messages
re0: Chip rev. 0x2c80
re0: MAC rev. 0x
re0:
Hello John and FreeBSD friends,
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:48:26AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, June 03, 2011 8:34:54 am Willy Offermans wrote:
> > Dear John and FreeBSD friends,
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:01:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Monday, May 30, 2011 5:25:14
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:00:09PM +0200, Willy Offermans wrote:
> Hello John and FreeBSD friends,
...
>
> The latter patch seems to work:
>
> >From the boot.msg:
>
>
>
> puc0: mem 0xfbfffc00-0xfbff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci6
> puc0: failed to enable port mapping!
> puc0: [FILTER]
>
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 01:56:15AM +0800, Ken Chen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone tried Realtek 8111e on 8.2-RELEASE? Realtek8111e should be supported,
> but I got following message:
>
> re0: port
> 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfdfff000-0xfdff,
> 0xfdff8000-0xfdffbfff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2
> re0:
On Friday, June 03, 2011 3:00:09 pm Willy Offermans wrote:
> Hello John and FreeBSD friends,
>
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 09:48:26AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, June 03, 2011 8:34:54 am Willy Offermans wrote:
> > > Dear John and FreeBSD friends,
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11
Update:
On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:09:21 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Anyway, your system has 4GB of RAM installed in it, so on 8.1-STABLE I'd
> recommend you try these settings:
>
> vm.kmem_size="3584M"
> vm.kmem_size_max="3584M"
> vfs.zfs.arc_max="2048M"
>
> Now, these are all chosen by me off
17 matches
Mail list logo