Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Andriy Gapon wrote: > > panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 > > > > Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? > Backtrace would be a first thing. OK, here we go (the core has been dumped from within a serial console BREAK DDB entry, I'm omitting the frames related to that):

Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 24/05/2011 10:26 Joerg Wunsch said the following: > As Andriy Gapon wrote: > >>> panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 >>> >>> Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? > >> Backtrace would be a first thing. > > OK, here we go (the core has been dumped from within a serial conso

Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:26:18AM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote: > As Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 > > > > > > Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? > > > Backtrace would be a first thing. > > OK, here we go (the core has been dumped from with

[poll] hyperthreading_allowed, hlt_logical_cpus, mp_watchdog

2011-05-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
I am planning on some changes in head and would like to see if people use the following features: - machdep.hyperthreading_allowed tunable and sysctl - machdep.hlt_logical_cpus tunable and sysctl - mp_watchdog kernel option If you are using any of the above, please let me know - better via a priv

gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
Hello, I'm trying to setup a MBR partition with a BSD slice in it using gpart on FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE. From the fixit console in the install i try to do gpart create -s MBR ad0 gpart add -t freebsd ad0 gpart create -s BSD ad0s1 gpart add -t freebsd-ufs ad0s1 gpart set -a active -i 1 ad0 For boot

Re: [poll] hyperthreading_allowed, hlt_logical_cpus, mp_watchdog

2011-05-24 Thread Ivan Voras
On 24/05/2011 15:21, Andriy Gapon wrote: I am planning on some changes in head and would like to see if people use the following features: - machdep.hyperthreading_allowed tunable and sysctl - machdep.hlt_logical_cpus tunable and sysctl - mp_watchdog kernel option If you are using any of the ab

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > Ie, no 16 sector offset in it. So my question is... What's the proper way of > doing a MBR + BSD label partition and where is it documented? what are the > different > bootcodes and when is needed each one?[1] gptboot is used for GPT scheme. It sh

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:46:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > > also, how do i know about offsets each partitioning scheme needs? shouldn't > > GEOM > > take care of it without user needing to know anything about it? > > Usually you do not n

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 24.05.2011 19:09, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:46:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: >> On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: >>> also, how do i know about offsets each partitioning scheme needs? shouldn't >>> GEOM >>> take care of it without user needing to

Re: [poll] hyperthreading_allowed, hlt_logical_cpus, mp_watchdog

2011-05-24 Thread Josh Carroll
> Whatever you do, please leave at least some way (at least a tunable) to > enable/disable HTT - some workloads are better with, and some without it, > and some BIOSes are unreliable in enabling/disabling it :) I noticed that disabling HTT via the machdep.hyperthreading_allowed tunable resulted in

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Victor Balada Diaz
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:05:15PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 24.05.2011 19:09, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:46:01PM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > >> On 24.05.2011 17:20, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > >>> also, how do i know about offsets each partitioning sc

Re: gpart usage

2011-05-24 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 24.05.2011 21:27, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: >>> So the 16 sector offset in BSD label is really needed or isn't? >> >> First 8 KBytes of the freebsd partition are reserved for the boot code >> (/boot/boot). The table of BSD partitions itself is located in the >> second sector. So, if you plan to

Re: Bring sio up to 8+

2011-05-24 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 5/22/2011 7:58 AM, Lars Eighner wrote: > > It seems increasing unlikely that uart will ever support the only internal > hardware modem recently available in the US (PR kern/155196), so what are > the chances of sio (which works in 7.x reasonably well and better with a > one-line hack) being bro

Re: RELENG_8: panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352

2011-05-24 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 24.05.2011 10:53, schrieb Jeremy Chadwick: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:26:18AM +0200, Joerg Wunsch wrote: >> As Andriy Gapon wrote: >> panic: wrong offset 4096 for sectorsize 2352 Any ideas why this happens, and how to avoid it? >> >>> Backtrace would be a first thing. >> >> OK,