-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have just committed a new vendor release of arcmsr(4) driver. This is
intended for 8.2-RELEASE so please test if you could.
Thanks in advance!
(Note: I have a tarball at
http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/misc/arcmsr.tar.xz which can be use
On Saturday 13 November 2010 08:32:05 Yue Wu wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> As the title, my settings for wireless networking worked fine before
> upgrade to the yesterday stable src, don't know why now it doesn't work
> anymore. I've attached the startup's log, loader.conf, rc.conf, and output
> of ifconf
Brandon Gooch wrote:
> 2010/11/5 Alexander Motin :
>> Hi.
>>
>> I've reviewed tests that scgcheck does to SCSI subsystem. It shown
>> combination of several issues in both CAM, ahci(4) and cdrtools itself.
>> Several small patches allow us to pass most of that tests:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~m
on 13/11/2010 04:27 Martin Matuska said the following:
> Yes, this is indeed a leak introduced by importing onnv revision 9214
> and it exists in perforce as well - very easy to reproduce.
>
> # mount -t zfs t...@t1 /mnt
> # umount /mnt (-> hang)
>
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_b
No, this is not good for us. Solaris does not allow "mounting" of
snapshots on any vnode, like we do. Solaris has them only in
.zfs/snapshots. This allows us to have read-only mounts without even
mounting the parent zfs.
Before v15 we have been happy with that code and had no issues :-)
I have a
on 13/11/2010 13:06 Martin Matuska said the following:
> No, this is not good for us. Solaris does not allow "mounting" of
> snapshots on any vnode, like we do. Solaris has them only in
> .zfs/snapshots. This allows us to have read-only mounts without even
> mounting the parent zfs.
>
> Before v15
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:09:55PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/11/2010 13:06 Martin Matuska said the following:
> > No, this is not good for us. Solaris does not allow "mounting" of
> > snapshots on any vnode, like we do. Solaris has them only in
> > .zfs/snapshots. This allows us to have re
on 13/11/2010 13:21 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:09:55PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 13/11/2010 13:06 Martin Matuska said the following:
>>> No, this is not good for us. Solaris does not allow "mounting" of
>>> snapshots on any vnode, like we do. Solaris has
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> 2010/11/5 Alexander Motin :
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I've reviewed tests that scgcheck does to SCSI subsystem. It shown
>>> combination of several issues in both CAM, ahci(4) and cdrtools itself.
>>> Several small patches all
I'm posting this to the freebsd-stable and freebsd-fs mailing lists. Followups
should probably happen on freebsd-fs.
I have a ZFS pool configured as:
zpool create data raidz da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 raidz da6 da7 da8 da9 da10
raidz da11 da12 da13 da14 da15 spare da16 log da0
where da1-16 are WD2003F
10 matches
Mail list logo
