Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-11 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alexander Motin wrote: > >>> Given the fact that many drives will probably only return 18 bytes of > >>> sense > >>> data, this will happen every time libscg is told to fetch more sense than > >>> the > >>> drive is willing to return. > >>> > >>> Is there a way to distinct an old kernel from

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-11 Thread Alexander Motin
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Alexander Motin wrote: > Given the fact that many drives will probably only return 18 bytes of > sense > data, this will happen every time libscg is told to fetch more sense than > the > drive is willing to return. > > Is there a way to dist

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-11 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alexander Motin wrote: > > The question still remains whether the previous implementation did return > > resid > >> 0 in some cases. In this case, I would need to implement both variants in > >> the > > libscg adaption layer and I would need to know whether I am running on an > > old > > ve

Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Kirill Yelizarov
--- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kirill Yelizarov wrote: > From: Kirill Yelizarov > Subject: Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 10:49 AM > > > --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kevin Oberman > wrote: > > > From: Kevin O

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-11 Thread Alexander Motin
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Alexander Motin wrote: > >>> The question still remains whether the previous implementation did return >>> resid 0 in some cases. In this case, I would need to implement both variants in the >>> libscg adaption layer and I would need to know whether I am run

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-11 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alexander Motin wrote: > > Compare the number of sense bytes I like to request (18) with the number > > previous FreeBSD versions did actually request. It is obvious that in case > > there is a resid reported onm an old kernel, libscg (with your chanhge) > > would > > believe that probably le

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-11 Thread Alexander Motin
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Alexander Motin wrote: > >>> Compare the number of sense bytes I like to request (18) with the number >>> previous FreeBSD versions did actually request. It is obvious that in case >>> there is a resid reported onm an old kernel, libscg (with your chanhge) >>> would >

Re: Sense fetching [Was: cdrtools /devel ...]

2010-11-11 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alexander Motin wrote: > > What is the requested size with the various HBAs in earlier kernels? > > For HBAs with automatic sense fetching -- as passed in sence_len request > field. In case of libscg it was SSD_FULL_SIZE before and I've set it to > be real value now. Returned sense_resid should b

Re: 8-STABLE buildworld failure

2010-11-11 Thread Bryce Edwards
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:48 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 06:09:08PM -0600, Bryce Edwards wrote: >> After updating source today, I am receiving the following error when >> running make NOCCACHE=YES -j16 buildkernel > > Please re-run the buildkernel without any -j or -jXX fl

Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Kevin Oberman
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:49:56 -0800 (PST) > From: Kirill Yelizarov > > > > --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > From: Kevin Oberman > > Subject: Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > > To: "Wilkinson, Alex" > > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > Date:

Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 11/11/2010 12:26 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:01:26 +0800 >> From: "Wilkinson, Alex" >> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org >> >> >> 0n Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 04:21:12AM -0800, Kirill Yelizarov wrote: >> >> >All my em cards running 8.1 stable don't reply to

Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Kirill Yelizarov
--- On Thu, 11/11/10, Mike Tancsa wrote: > From: Mike Tancsa > Subject: Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Date: Thursday, November 11, 2010, 10:01 PM > On 11/11/2010 12:26 AM, Kevin Oberman > wrote: > >> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:01:2

Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:10:57AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:49:56 -0800 (PST) > > From: Kirill Yelizarov > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > > From: Kevin Oberman > > > Subject: Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLA

[releng_7_1 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-11-11 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-11 15:34:59 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-11 15:34:59 - starting RELENG_7_1 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-11-11 15:34:59 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-11 15:35:03 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-11 15:35:03 - /usr/

Re: icmp packets on em larger than 1472 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Kevin Oberman
> From: Pyun YongHyeon > Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 13:04:36 -0800 > > On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 08:10:57AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:49:56 -0800 (PST) > > > From: Kirill Yelizarov > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Thu, 11/11/10, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > > > > F

[releng_7_1 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-11-11 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-11 16:11:14 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-11 16:11:14 - starting RELENG_7_1 tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-11-11 16:11:14 - mkdir /usr/home/tinderbox/RELENG_7_1/i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-11-11 16:11:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-1

New event timers for 8-STABLE

2010-11-11 Thread Alexander Motin
me if you find anything else. Latest patch can be found here: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/timers_merge/timers_merge-2010.patch Merge instructions (list of revisions, if somebody want to redo it): http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/timers_merge/guide-2010 After patching you need just rebuild

Re: New event timers for 8-STABLE [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
mode or other timer. > - if HPET interrupt shared with other device, system load average may >lie (report +1 value) -- not a timer problem and not fatal. >Please report me if you find anything else. > >Latest patch can be found here: >http://people.freebsd.or

Re: New event timers for 8-STABLE [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Adam Vande More
> > patches apply cleanly but buildkernel fails: > > Works here with fresh source, amd64 -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-st

Re: New event timers for 8-STABLE

2010-11-11 Thread Brandon Gooch
device, system load average may > lie (report +1 value) -- not a timer problem and not fatal. > Please report me if you find anything else. > > Latest patch can be found here: > http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/timers_merge/timers_merge-2010.patch > > Merge instructions (list

Re: New event timers for 8-STABLE [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2010-11-11 Thread Brandon Gooch
t;    >Please report me if you find anything else. >    > >    >Latest patch can be found here: >    >http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/timers_merge/timers_merge-2010.patch >    > >    >Merge instructions (list of revisions, if somebody want to redo it): >    >http://p