on 29/10/2010 17:41 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 29/10/2010 15:36 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 29/10/2010 12:04 Artemiev Igor said the following:
>>> Yep, this problem exists. You may workaround it via bumping up
>>> net.inet.tcp.sendspace up to 128k. zfs sendfile is very ineffe
on 29/10/2010 20:51 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:06:03PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Probably yes, but have to be careful there.
>> First, do vm_page_grab only for UIO_NOCOPY case.
>> Second, the first page is already "shared busy" after vm_page_io_start()
>> ca
on 30/10/2010 11:16 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> Or maybe something like the following?
> It looks a little bit cleaner to me, but still is not perfect, as I have not
> handled unnecessary busy-ing of the pages where something more lightweight
> could
> have sufficed (e.g. wiring and shared
on 30/10/2010 11:16 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 30/10/2010 11:16 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> Or maybe something like the following?
>> It looks a little bit cleaner to me, but still is not perfect, as I have not
>> handled unnecessary busy-ing of the pages where something more lig
Heh, next try.
Index: sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c
===
--- sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c (revision
214318)
+++ sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c (
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:25:05AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > Note: I have only compile tested the patch.
>
> Missed one NULL check.
>
> Index: sys/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c
> ===
> --- sys/cddl/contr
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:52:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Heh, next try.
Got a panic, "vm_page_unwire: invalid wire count: 0"
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send
on 30/10/2010 13:12 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:52:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> Heh, next try.
>
> Got a panic, "vm_page_unwire: invalid wire count: 0"
Oh, thank you for testing - forgot another piece (VM_ALLOC_WIRE for
vm_page_alloc):
Index: sys/cddl
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:33:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 30/10/2010 13:12 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:52:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >
> >> Heh, next try.
> >
> > Got a panic, "vm_page_unwire: invalid wire count: 0"
>
> Oh, thank you for testi
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 22:08:54 +0300 Mikolaj Golub wrote to Pawel Jakub Dawidek:
PJD>> I looked at the code and the keepalive packets arbe sent from another
PJD>> thread. Could you try turning them off in primary.c and see if that
PJD>> helps?
MG> At first I set RETRY_SLEEP to 1 sec to have mo
on 30/10/2010 14:25 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:33:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 30/10/2010 13:12 Artemiev Igor said the following:
>>> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:52:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
Heh, next try.
>>>
>>> Got a panic, "vm_page_unwi
> >> Oh, thank you for testing - forgot another piece
> (VM_ALLOC_WIRE for vm_page_alloc):
> >
> > Yep, it work. But VM_ALLOC_WIRE not exists in RELENG_8,
> therefore i slightly modified your patch:
>
> I apologize for my haste, it should have been VM_ALLOC_WIRED.
> Here is a corrected patch:
>
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:43:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I apologize for my haste, it should have been VM_ALLOC_WIRED.
Ok, applied and tested under some load(~1200 active connections, outgoing
~80MB/s). Patch work as expected and i has noted no side effects. Just one
question - should gro
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:43:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 30/10/2010 14:25 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:33:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 30/10/2010 13:12 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> >>> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:52:54PM +0300, Andriy G
on 31/10/2010 02:37 Kostik Belousov said the following:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:43:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 30/10/2010 14:25 Artemiev Igor said the following:
>>> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 01:33:00PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 30/10/2010 13:12 Artemiev Igor said the followin
on 30/10/2010 22:01 Artemiev Igor said the following:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 05:43:54PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> I apologize for my haste, it should have been VM_ALLOC_WIRED.
>
> Ok, applied and tested under some load(~1200 active connections, outgoing
> ~80MB/s). Patch work as expected
16 matches
Mail list logo
