On 19 Oct, 2010, at 07:24 , Adam Stylinski wrote:
> I hope I'm not asking anything too obvious, but I just saw this commit via
> the svn-src-all list:
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2010-October/030466.html
>
> And I was wondering if this perhaps means that log device removal is
I am trying to do a 'zfs send -i' and failing.
This is my simple proof of concept test:
Create the data
# zfs create storage/a
# touch /storage/a/1
# touch /storage/a/2
# touch /storage/a/3
Snapshot
# zfs snapshot storage/a...@2010.10.19
send
# zfs send storage/a...@2010.10.19 | zfs receive -v
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:32:33AM -0400, Dan Langille typed:
> I am trying to do a 'zfs send -i' and failing.
>
> This is my simple proof of concept test:
>
> Create the data
> # zfs create storage/a
> # touch /storage/a/1
> # touch /storage/a/2
> # touch /storage/a/3
>
> Snapshot
> # zfs snaps
On Wed, October 20, 2010 8:44 am, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 08:32:33AM -0400, Dan Langille typed:
>> I am trying to do a 'zfs send -i' and failing.
>>
>> This is my simple proof of concept test:
>>
>> Create the data
>> # zfs create storage/a
>> # touch /storage/a/1
>> # touc
On 2010-10-20, at 8:54 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Not that I know of. But I do think that is the issue. Thank you. Adding
> a -F option to the receive helps:
>
> # zfs send -i storage/bac...@2010.10.19 storage/bac...@2010.10.20 | zfs
> receive -vF storage/compressed/bacula
> receiving increment
Seeing similar here Dan, my destination filesystems are becoming modified
sometime after the previous snapshot has been sent so the incremental fails to
be received. However, the server I'm sending to is not in use so I can't
explain why it's changing.
When I run a zdiff on the receiving sys
hi,
with the latest -stable, the boot process gets stuck with
...
ugen2.2: at usbus2
uhub6: on
usbus2
uhub6: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered
ugen3.2: at usbus3
ukbd0: on usbus3
kbd2 at ukbd0
ums0: on usbus3
ums0: 3 buttons and [Z] coordinates ID=0 <- stuck here
run_
> Being the author of many problem reports I can say that most of them were not
> critical and for marginal cases (like some issues with hooks or a race that
> showed up when changing HAST role in loop -- you would never do this in
> production). And fixes were committed in several days after a rep
Hi folks,
I've been playing with ZFS in 8.1-RELEASE (amd64) on a Sun Fire X4500
with 16 GB RAM and in general it seems to work well when used as
recommended.
BUT...
In spite of the suggestion of Sun and FreeBSD developers to the
contrary, I have been trying to create some zraid pools of
Hi Lawrence,
Interesting; have you tried this for raidz2 as well?
I just created a raidz2 pool with 5 disks and then added another 5
disk raidz2 to it, so, total of 10 disks in the pool (though this is
ultimately a losing strategy unless the number of disks is >> 9
because two drives are l
Ahoy. I just thought I'd add a data point to the mix. I have an
11-disk v13 pool comprised of 400-GB disks on an 8.1 amd64 system and
the machine behaves just fine with it:
# zpool status
pool: archive
state: ONLINE
status: The pool is formatted using an older on-disk format. The pool can
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:27:38AM -0400, Sean Thomas Caron wrote:
> I've been playing with ZFS in 8.1-RELEASE (amd64) on a Sun Fire
> X4500 with 16 GB RAM and in general it seems to work well when used
> as recommended.
>
> BUT...
>
> In spite of the suggestion of Sun and FreeBSD developers to t
on 20/10/2010 21:05 Sean Bruno said the following:
> HP testers report that 7 nor 8 install without the kernel
> 'insta-panicing' across all CPUS at the same time.
>
> I'm going to ask that they try the latest 9 snap shot and then kill the
> project at this time.
So you are not willing to try the
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 06:01 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 1:16:07 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 19/10/2010 06:11 Wilkinson, Alex said the following:
> > > Will it work something like http://freshmeat.net/projects/mcelog/ ?
> >
> > jhb has a port of this, yes.
>
> The r
on 20/10/2010 21:16 Sean Bruno said the following:
> Huh ... did I miss it? I'm willing to try a lot.
Perhaps then :-)
This was my post:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.stable/72450/focus=72515
It had a link to a parallel discussion on current:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.c
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 11:11 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/10/2010 21:05 Sean Bruno said the following:
> > HP testers report that 7 nor 8 install without the kernel
> > 'insta-panicing' across all CPUS at the same time.
> >
> > I'm going to ask that they try the latest 9 snap shot and then ki
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 11:20 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 20/10/2010 21:16 Sean Bruno said the following:
> > Huh ... did I miss it? I'm willing to try a lot.
>
> Perhaps then :-)
> This was my post:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.stable/72450/focus=72515
>
> It had a link to a par
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:28:21 -0700 Sean Bruno wrote:
> So here's the problem.
> Machine in in Houston, can't netboot/nfsboot it. The basic installers
> all will get me to the Beastie loader, but fail after loading the kernel
> and attempting to boot.
> I guess, I could replace the kernel on the
Hi Jeremy,
Thanks for the very helpful response!
I added all debugging options that you specified to my kernel and
rebuilt; then set the kernel parameters as you mention (I was being a
bit lazy earlier when I called them sysctls; I always tuned them in
loader.conf; just that you can view t
19 matches
Mail list logo
