On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Ted Faber wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, Ian, I don't have anything new, wrt the ATA.
> >
> > Thanks Ted. Interesting that nobody else seems to have run into this
> > issue, must be a (some?) Thinkpads thing
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Ian Smith wrote:
> In this way I discovered that 'date' commands reported the time some
> seconds after the resume (perhaps hours ago, or yesterday) until the
Sorry, that should say 'seconds after the _suspend_', not the resume.
> stall ended, disk light flashed and nor
Hi list,
this is an exerpt from 8.1R detailed Release Notes:
2.2.2.1 Multimedia Support
[snipped]
The snd_hda(4) driver now supports multichannel (4.0 and 7.1)
playback support. The 5.1 mode support is disabled now due to
unidentified synchronization problem. Devices which supports
the 7.1 mode
Hi FreeBSD-stable,
I'm having problems booting 8.1R on a KVM virtualised host backed on AMD
hardware. It works flawlessly on Intel backed KVM. Please find attached
the message I get on boot. This loops endlessly.
Can anyone give me any advice on how to start tracking this down? I'm
happy to give
on 27/09/2010 14:45 Luke Marsden said the following:
> Hi FreeBSD-stable,
>
> I'm having problems booting 8.1R on a KVM virtualised host backed on AMD
> hardware. It works flawlessly on Intel backed KVM. Please find attached
^
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 15:24 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 27/09/2010 14:45 Luke Marsden said the following:
> > Hi FreeBSD-stable,
> >
> > I'm having problems booting 8.1R on a KVM virtualised host backed on AMD
> > hardware. It works flawlessly on Intel backed KVM. Please find attached
> --
on 27/09/2010 16:53 Luke Marsden said the following:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 15:24 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 27/09/2010 14:45 Luke Marsden said the following:
>>> Hi FreeBSD-stable,
>>>
>>> I'm having problems booting 8.1R on a KVM virtualised host backed on AMD
>>> hardware. It works flawle
> http://lukemarsden.net/8.1R-KVM-AMD-failure.png
This picture is useless. No debug symbols == no useful information.
1. Please, build your kernel with debug symbols. Your kernel
configuration file should contain string
makeoptions DEBUG=-g# Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symb
S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> this is an exerpt from 8.1R detailed Release Notes:
>
> 2.2.2.1 Multimedia Support
> [snipped]
> The snd_hda(4) driver now supports multichannel (4.0 and 7.1)
> playback support. The 5.1 mode support is disabled now due to
> unidentified synchronization problem. Devices whi
Hi all,
Thanks for your responses.
> 1. Please, build your kernel with debug symbols.
> 2. Show kgdb output
I will build a debug kernel as per your instructions and post the
results as soon as I can. Likely in the next couple of days.
I have secured us test hardware at ElasticHosts to debug thi
Alexander Motin wrote:
> S.N.Grigoriev wrote:
> > this is an exerpt from 8.1R detailed Release Notes:
> >
> > 2.2.2.1 Multimedia Support
> > [snipped]
> > The snd_hda(4) driver now supports multichannel (4.0 and 7.1)
> > playback support. The 5.1 mode support is disabled now due to
> >
Ian Smith wrote:
> [...] During the 60s resume stall period, iff
> I'd suspended from a VTY, I found I could slowly (like maybe 3 seconds
> per character echoed) type a command, and some commands - possibly those
> cached? as there's no HD access - would run after another few seconds.
>
> In this
On Monday 27 September 2010 02:55 pm, Vitaly Magerya wrote:
> Ian Smith wrote:
> > [...] During the 60s resume stall period, iff
> > I'd suspended from a VTY, I found I could slowly (like maybe 3
> > seconds per character echoed) type a command, and some commands -
> > possibly those cached? as the
CPU time accounting is broken on one of my machines running 8-STABLE. I
ran a test with a simple program that just loops and consumes CPU time:
% time ./a.out
94.544u 0.000s 19:14.10 8.1%62+2054k 0+0io 0pf+0w
The display in top shows the process with WCPU at 100%, but TIME
increments very sl
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:25:10PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote:
> CPU time accounting is broken on one of my machines running 8-STABLE. I
> ran a test with a simple program that just loops and consumes CPU time:
>
> % time ./a.out
> 94.544u 0.000s 19:14.10 8.1% 62+2054k 0+0io 0pf+0w
>
> The display
15 matches
Mail list logo