After upgrading from 7.3 to 8.1, moused has started drawing 100% CPU
(even when the mouse is not used). moused -d -f doesn't output anything
suspicious - in particular, it does not display anything when the mouse
is not moved.
root10833 100.0 0.1 1732 1100 v0 R+ 10:51AM 8:47.62
/u
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
>
> Thanks for the notice.
Just a thank you message for the v15 development, MFS and this fast
fix. Maybe this is just noise on the lists, but I think that too
little thanks get to the Free
I just upgraded my desktop system from 7.3 to 8.1, and the main hard
drive, which was /dev/ad6 before is now /dev/ad10. Consequently, the
initial boot failed when trying to mount the root file system from ad6.
The desktop system is now fixed, but I also have a rented server with
only a serial co
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:02:38AM +0200, Michael Sperber wrote:
> After upgrading from 7.3 to 8.1, moused has started drawing 100% CPU
> (even when the mouse is not used). moused -d -f doesn't output anything
> suspicious - in particular, it does not display anything when the mouse
> is not move
Am 16.09.2010 um 11:05 schrieb Michael Sperber:
> I just upgraded my desktop system from 7.3 to 8.1, and the main hard
> drive, which was /dev/ad6 before is now /dev/ad10. Consequently, the
> initial boot failed when trying to mount the root file system from ad6.
>
> The desktop system is now fi
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:05:06AM +0200, Michael Sperber wrote:
> I just upgraded my desktop system from 7.3 to 8.1, and the main hard
> drive, which was /dev/ad6 before is now /dev/ad10. Consequently, the
> initial boot failed when trying to mount the root file system from ad6.
>
> The desktop
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Michael Sperber
wrote:
>
> I just upgraded my desktop system from 7.3 to 8.1, and the main hard
> drive, which was /dev/ad6 before is now /dev/ad10. Consequently, the
> initial boot failed when trying to mount the root file system from ad6.
>
doesn't 7.3 have ufs
Michael Sperber wrote:
I just upgraded my desktop system from 7.3 to 8.1, and the main hard
drive, which was /dev/ad6 before is now /dev/ad10. Consequently, the
initial boot failed when trying to mount the root file system from ad6.
The desktop system is now fixed, but I also have a rented ser
Stefan Bethke writes:
> Am 16.09.2010 um 11:05 schrieb Michael Sperber:
>
>> I just upgraded my desktop system from 7.3 to 8.1, and the main hard
>> drive, which was /dev/ad6 before is now /dev/ad10. Consequently, the
>> initial boot failed when trying to mount the root file system from ad6.
>>
Jeremy Chadwick writes:
> Michael, in the meantime can you provide dmesg details that pertain to
> your serial ports? uartXX devices would be sufficient, in addition the
> device its attached to (e.g. acpi0, etc.).
uart0: <16550 or compatible> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0
uart0:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0200, Guido Falsi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
>>
>> Thanks for the notice.
>
> Just a thank you message for the v15 development, MFS and this fast
> fix. Maybe this is just nois
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 11:40:43AM +0200, Michael Sperber wrote:
> Stefan Bethke writes:
> > Am 16.09.2010 um 11:05 schrieb Michael Sperber:
> >
> >> I just upgraded my desktop system from 7.3 to 8.1, and the main hard
> >> drive, which was /dev/ad6 before is now /dev/ad10. Consequently, the
> >>
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0200, Guido Falsi
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
> >> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the notice.
> >
> > Just a thank you m
On 09/16/10 12:42, Guido Falsi wrote:
Related to this, I have a question.
Is it convenient to put databases on a compresed filesystem? Apart from
the space advantage, does it give any speed advantage/penalty?
It depends on what you do. It will not save you memory usage either
since data need
Hi all,
I should really get myself subscribed to sta...@...
Anyway, Michael, can you attach truss to the process to see what it's
actually doing (truss -p $pid)? I'm interested in a single `iteration'
of what it's doing. Thanks!
--
Ed Schouten
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpcolJSxe3PO.pgp
Descri
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:42:36 +0200, Guido Falsi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 10:53:02AM +0100, Marian Hettwer wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:42:40 +0200, Guido Falsi
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 07:44:31AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote:
>> >> I have fixed the missing bits in r212688
Hello
Is there an actual reason why "daily_scrub_zfs_enable" is missing in
/etc/defaults/periodic.conf?
/etc/periodic/daily/800.scrub-zfs was mfc'ed two weeks ago:
MFC r211800
Regards,
Thomas
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fre
Ed Schouten writes:
> I should really get myself subscribed to sta...@...
>
> Anyway, Michael, can you attach truss to the process to see what it's
> actually doing (truss -p $pid)? I'm interested in a single `iteration'
> of what it's doing. Thanks!
The relevant bit is this, I think:
open("/d
Hi all,
I re-decided to move my nfs server from solaris to fbsd. So I am using
test machines to see if it works. I have my kerberos realm configured,
and seems to work fine, both nfsserver and nfsclient have their host and
nfs keytabs stored in /etc/krb5.keytab files, and I am following the
Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
caveats to upgrading ?
Do I just do
zpool upgrade -a
zfs upgrade -a
or are there any extra steps ?
---Mike
Mike Tancsa,
On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
> caveats to upgrading ?
>
> Do I just do
>
> zpool upgrade -a
> zfs upgrade -a
>
> or are there any extra steps ?
>
Hi Mike,
No-one knows your bootcode better than you. So if you
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:37:56 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:37:56 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:37:56 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:38:40 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:38:40 - /usr/b
> Hi all,
>
> I re-decided to move my nfs server from solaris to fbsd. So I am using
> test machines to see if it works. I have my kerberos realm configured,
> and seems to work fine, both nfsserver and nfsclient have their host
> and
> nfs keytabs stored in /etc/krb5.keytab files, and I am follow
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:50:13 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:50:13 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:50:13 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:50:54 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-16 14:50:54 - /usr/b
Quoting Thomas (from Thu, 16 Sep 2010
14:01:05 +0200):
Hello
Is there an actual reason why "daily_scrub_zfs_enable" is missing in
/etc/defaults/periodic.conf?
Besides the fact that the authoritative source of information is the
man-page: the 800.scrub-zfs is handling the defaults interna
At 11:18 AM 9/16/2010, jhell wrote:
On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
> Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
> caveats to upgrading ?
>
> Do I just do
>
> zpool upgrade -a
> zfs upgrade -a
>
> or are there any extra steps ?
>
Hi Mike,
No-one knows your bo
Dont forget to read the general "ZFS notes" section in UPDATING:
ZFS notes
-
When upgrading the boot ZFS pool to a new version, always follow
these two steps:
1.) recompile and reinstall the ZFS boot loader and boot block
(this is part of "make buildworld" and "make installworld")
2.) u
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Eivind E wrote:
(WW) RADEONHD(0): !!! Option HPD is set !!!
This shall only be used to work around broken connector tables.
Please report your findings to radeo...@opensuse.org
radeon doesn't have this option at all.
(II)
Hi Rick,
glad to hearing from you, since we had a few relevant discussions in
the past.
On 16/9/2010 6:30 μμ, Rick Macklem wrote:
Normally the server will have a keytab entry for its
fully qualified domain name like:
nfs/fbsdclient.ee.auth...@example
and if that is the case, the client is
Today I've got a pretty strange event. It looks like a reboot but
unreasonable as far as I see. Before server's uptime was over month,
it's sometimes have to reboot for kernel updates or somethings like
that. I've digen all logs and didn't find a reason, so here they all.
auth.log
Sep 16 13:59:58
2010/9/16 David DEMELIER :
> 2010/7/19 Jung-uk Kim :
>> On Friday 16 July 2010 07:18 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>>> On Friday 16 July 2010 03:22 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>>> > On Friday 16 July 2010 03:00 pm, David DEMELIER wrote:
>>> > > 2010/6/19 paradox :
>>> > > >>On Wednesday 02 June 2010 04:25 pm,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:37:29PM +0400, Michael BlackHeart wrote:
> Today I've got a pretty strange event. It looks like a reboot but
> unreasonable as far as I see. Before server's uptime was over month,
> it's sometimes have to reboot for kernel updates or somethings like
> that. I've digen all
TB --- 2010-09-16 15:30:11 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-16 15:30:11 - starting RELENG_8 tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-09-16 15:30:11 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-16 15:30:37 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-16 15:30:37 -
On 09/16/2010 17:18, jhell wrote:
On 09/16/2010 09:55, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Thanks again for all the ZFS fixes and enhancements! Are there any
caveats to upgrading ?
Do I just do
zpool upgrade -a
zfs upgrade -a
or are there any extra steps ?
Hi Mike,
No-one knows your bootcode better tha
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 18:20:35 +0200 (CEST), Eivind E
wrote:
>
> I'll try another card (not radeon) this evening, and if that works,
> I won't bother with the radeon anymore. This is my primary working
> machine and I need to be able to use it again. I do however
> wish to thank everybody for thei
2010/9/16 Jeremy Chadwick :
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:37:29PM +0400, Michael BlackHeart wrote:
>> Today I've got a pretty strange event. It looks like a reboot but
>> unreasonable as far as I see. Before server's uptime was over month,
>> it's sometimes have to reboot for kernel updates or somet
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Eivind E wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Eivind E wrote:
(WW) RADEONHD(0): !!! Option HPD is set !!!
This shall only be used to work around broken connector tables.
Please report your findings to radeo...@opensuse.org
radeon d
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, J.R. Oldroyd wrote:
Finally I tried the radeonhd driver from the experimental port
in x11-drivers/xf86-video-radeonhd-devel. This works perfectly
for me: good performance AND xvideo support.
I tried this driver aswell, it still locked up. I've replaced the card
with an nv
On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Warren Block wrote:
The port names are specific to the driver. I'd guess it should be
Option "Monitor-DV-I_1" "Skjerm"
Thanks, I'll make a note of it if I put the card back to check it
later on.
--
_
_ //
\\// Eivind Evensen
\/
Sweet. What were you doin'?
On 09/16/2010 05:02 AM, freebsd-stable-requ...@freebsd.org wrote:
Re: very stupid mistake: a part of /usr is deleted
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
T
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Bartosz Stec wrote:
> On 2010-09-15 17:20, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>>> uname -a ->
>>> FreeBSD (XX).uni-tuebingen.de 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #0:
>>> Sat Nov 21 15:02:08 UTC 2009
>>> r...@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>>
>> That
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote:
[..]
> That is actually an easy situation to recover, you can do it in at least
> these ways:
>
> 1) if you build/upgrade from source, you can either reinstall if you have
> working /usr/obj or try and rebuild them if you have working /usr/src
>
> 2)
42 matches
Mail list logo
