Re: Extending your zfs pool with multiple devices

2010-09-03 Thread Don Lewis
On 2 Sep, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:56:04PM -0400, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: >> [regarding getting more disks in a machine] >> An inexpensive option are SATA port replicators. Think SATA switch or >> hub. 1:4 is common and cheap. >> >> I have a motherboard with intel I

Re: Extending your zfs pool with multiple devices

2010-09-03 Thread Michal
What is really odd is I see your replies but not my original post, how very strange?? Thank you for all of your assistance. I would like to move to being able to build a cheap san-like storage area for a DB, I don't know how well it would work but I'd like to try it anyway since things like HP

Re: Extending your zfs pool with multiple devices

2010-09-03 Thread jhell
On 09/03/2010 04:25, Michal wrote: > What is really odd is I see your replies but not my original post, how > very strange?? > > Thank you for all of your assistance. I would like to move to being able > to build a cheap san-like storage area for a DB, I don't know how well > it would work but I'd

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-03 Thread Jim Bryant
i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to get the make clean to finish. it was taking forever to even paint the xterm in the make clean window. -stable built as of last week, amd64 kernel, core

what's up with cvsup?

2010-09-03 Thread Jim Bryant
is it just me, or are all the cvsup servers down? i've tried this on several machines, i can ping some of them (not all), and the ones that can be pinged all timeout when doing a make update in /usr/src. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list h

Re: what's up with cvsup?

2010-09-03 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 03:00:04PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: > is it just me, or are all the cvsup servers down? > > i've tried this on several machines, i can ping some of them (not > all), and the ones that can be pinged all timeout when doing a make > update in /usr/src. It's just you. Timesta

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-03 Thread Michal Varga
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:03 -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: > i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then > started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to > get the make clean to finish. it was taking forever to even paint the > xterm in the make clea

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-03 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Michal Varga wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 14:03 -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: > > i just noticed this too... had a build going of qt-creator, and then > > started a /usr/src make clean, and had to abort the qt-creator build to > > get the make clean to fini

Re: what's up with cvsup?

2010-09-03 Thread Jim Bryant
my bad. it was a router firewall setting. Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 03:00:04PM -0500, Jim Bryant wrote: is it just me, or are all the cvsup servers down? i've tried this on several machines, i can ping some of them (not all), and the ones that can be pinged all timeout

apcupsd, USB and FreeBSD 8.1 aren't getting along

2010-09-03 Thread Ben Schumacher
All- It seems that something about the combination of FreeBSD 8.1 and apcupsd connecting to an APC Back-UPS RS 1500. Here's what I've got: 1. FreeBSD 8.1 (source compiled up to RELENG_8_1 for security fixes) 2. apcupsd 3.14.8 compiled from FreeBSD Ports 3. APC Back-UPS RS 1500 This was working f

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-03 Thread Bruce Cran
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010 13:50:10 -0700 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Just be aware of this problem[1] when using it. (I've been working > on a proper fix -- not a hack -- for the problem for about a week now. > Stress level is very high given the ambiguous nature of many aspects > of GEOM and libgeom lack

Re: Tuning the scheduler? Desktop with a CPU-intensive task becomes rapidly unusable.

2010-09-03 Thread David Xu
jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: On Thu, 2 Sep 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 02/09/2010 12:08 jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk said the following: On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: On 09/01/10 15:08, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote: I'm running -STABLE with a kde-derived deskt

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

2010-09-03 Thread Rick C. Petty
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:59:38PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > > I don't tune anything with sysctl, I just use what I get from an > install from CD onto i386 hardware. (I don't even bother to increase > kern.ipc.maxsockbuf although I suggest that in the mount message.) Sure. But maybe you don't

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow?

2010-09-03 Thread Rick C. Petty
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 11:46:30AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > > > > I am experiencing similar issues with newnfs: > > > > 1) I have two clients that each get around 0.5MiB/s to 2.6MiB/s > > reading > > from the NFS4-share on Gbit-Lan > > > > 2) Mounting with -t newnfs -o nfsv3 results in no pe

Re: Extending your zfs pool with multiple devices

2010-09-03 Thread perryh
Michal wrote: > What is really odd is I see your replies but not my original post, > how very strange?? One of your subscription options is whether you get your own posts back. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma