Re: Panic on 8-STABLE at boot

2010-06-30 Thread Mickaël Maillot
and after 9 hours, another panic: http://freelooser.fr/freebsd/deadlock.jpg any help is appreciated 2010/6/29 Mickaël Maillot : > i've got a panic with zfs only machine so i decided to build a witness kernel > and just after the first reboot: > http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/3314/panicflowta

Re: Panic on 8-STABLE at boot

2010-06-30 Thread pluknet
On 29 June 2010 19:58, Mickaël Maillot wrote: > i've got a panic with zfs only machine so i decided to build a witness kernel > and just after the first reboot: > http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/3314/panicflowtable2.jpg > > the second boot: no prob > > uname -a > FreeBSD cg196.security-mail.net

pde.demotions counts even if pg_ps disabled

2010-06-30 Thread pluknet
HI. This is 7.3-RELEASE-p1 right after boot. Looks like pmap_demote_pde is not properly protected w/ pg_ps_enabled. # sysctl vm.pmap vm.pmap.pmap_collect_active: 0 vm.pmap.pmap_collect_inactive: 0 vm.pmap.pv_entry_spare: 1421 vm.pmap.pv_entry_allocs: 686316 vm.pmap.pv_entry_frees: 675473 vm.pmap.

Kernel panic in pppoe_findsession (ng_pppoe.c)

2010-06-30 Thread nickolasbug
Hello! Yestarday I've got 4 kernel panics with the same problem - page fault while in kernel mode, in netgraph pppoe module. I've defined, that fault produce pppoe_findsession() function - see below. Here is the contents of /var/crash/info.5 file: Dump header from device /dev/gpt/swap Architec

Re: pde.demotions counts even if pg_ps disabled

2010-06-30 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 30 June 2010 7:28:50 am pluknet wrote: > HI. > > This is 7.3-RELEASE-p1 right after boot. > Looks like pmap_demote_pde is not properly protected w/ pg_ps_enabled. The direct map always uses superpages, but we may demote a superpage in the direct map due to conflict caching attribute

kernel issues with 8 STABLE

2010-06-30 Thread Free BSD
Dear List Members I have recently installed 8 STABLE and built my custom kernel, but still getting these in my pciconf list no...@pci0:0:3:0: class=0x078000 card=0x02761028 chip=0x2e148086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = 'Intel Active Client Mana

Re: kernel issues with 8 STABLE

2010-06-30 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 01:16:34PM +0100, Free BSD wrote: > Dear List Members > > I have recently installed 8 STABLE and built my custom kernel, but > still getting these in my pciconf list > > no...@pci0:0:3:0: class=0x078000 card=0x02761028 > chip=0x2e148086 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 > vendor

Problems with ATA_CAM support in RELENG_8

2010-06-30 Thread Paul Mather
I am running FreeBSD/amd64 RELENG_8 on a Dell Optiplex 745. The hard drive in the system is SATA and I have "Normal", not "Legacy" SATA support enabled in the BIOS. (BIOS is V2.6.4.) I am assuming this will enable native AHCI mode for the drive. I built a kernel with ATA_CAM support, but for

Re: Problems with ATA_CAM support in RELENG_8

2010-06-30 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:07:54PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > I am running FreeBSD/amd64 RELENG_8 on a Dell Optiplex 745. The hard drive > in the system is SATA and I have "Normal", not "Legacy" SATA support enabled > in the BIOS. (BIOS is V2.6.4.) I am assuming this will enable native AHCI

Re: Fwd: Problems with ATA_CAM support in RELENG_8

2010-06-30 Thread Alexander Motin
Garrett Cooper wrote: > I am running FreeBSD/amd64 RELENG_8 on a Dell Optiplex 745. The hard > drive in the system is SATA and I have "Normal", not "Legacy" SATA > support enabled in the BIOS. (BIOS is V2.6.4.) I am assuming this > will enable native AHCI mode for the drive. > > I built a kerne

Re: Problems with ATA_CAM support in RELENG_8

2010-06-30 Thread Paul Mather
On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:38 PM, Alexander Motin wrote: >> To enable ATA_CAM AHCI support, I included this in my kernel config file: >> >> # ATA and ATAPI devices >> options ATA_CAM >> device ahci >> device atacore >> device atapci >> options ATA_STATIC_ID

Re: Problems with ATA_CAM support in RELENG_8

2010-06-30 Thread Alexander Motin
Paul Mather wrote: >> PS: ATA_STATIC_ID is useless when ATA_CAM option enabled. > > Thank you (and Jeremy Chadwick) for the help and information. The kernel > configuration options I used above were taken from a VirtualBox FreeBSD/amd64 > install I have that I converted over to ATA_CAM when the

Re: Problems with ATA_CAM support in RELENG_8

2010-06-30 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 04:52:22PM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > I thought ICH8 supported AHCI, but maybe it's only ICH8R that does? No, not necessarily. There are ICHxx (non-ICHxxR) models which definitely provide AHCI (ex. ICHxxM for their Mobile chipsets; yes, many laptops do have AHCI capabilit

Re: Problems with ATA_CAM support in RELENG_8

2010-06-30 Thread Akihiko Taniguchi
xc ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Why is NFSv4 so slow? (root/toor)

2010-06-30 Thread Rick Macklem
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Ian Smith wrote: I wondered whether this might be a Linux thing. On my 7.2 system, % find /usr/src -name "*.[ch]" -exec grep -Hw getpwuid {} \; > file returns 195 lines, many in the form getpwuid(getuid()), in many base and contrib components - including id(1), bind, s

Re: Panic on 8-STABLE at boot

2010-06-30 Thread Mickaël Maillot
thx pluknet. my second panic appear today on 3 recent 8-stable amd64 machine after doing 8 ~ 10h of zfs receive. 2010/6/30 pluknet : > On 29 June 2010 19:58, Mickaël Maillot wrote: >> i've got a panic with zfs only machine so i decided to build a witness kernel >> and just after the first reboot