On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:44:43 +0200 Leon Meßner wrote:
LM> Hi,
LM> I hope this is not the wrong list to ask. Didn't get any answers on
LM> -questions.
LM> When you try to do the following inside a nullfs mounted directory,
LM> where the nullfs origin is itself mounted via nfs you get an error
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 11:56:10 +0300 Mikolaj Golub wrote to Leon Meßner:
MG> See the attached patch (it works for me on both 8-STABLE and CURRENT).
Sorry, actually here is the patch.
--
Mikolaj Golub
Index: sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:44:43 +0200 Leon Me??ner wrote:
>
> LM> Hi,
> LM> I hope this is not the wrong list to ask. Didn't get any answers on
> LM> -questions.
>
> LM> When you try to do the following inside a nullfs mounted di
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:44:43 +0200 Leon Me??ner wrote:
LM> Hi,
LM> I hope this is not the wrong list to ask. Didn't get any answers on
LM> -questions.
LM> When you try to do the fo
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:15:49AM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 11:56:10AM +0300, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >>On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:44:43 +0200 Leon Me??ner wrote:
> >>
> >> LM> Hi,
> >> LM> I hope this is not the wro
2010/6/11 John Baldwin :
> On Friday 11 June 2010 6:27:48 am Giovanni Trematerra wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Giovanni Trematerra
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:35 PM, David DEMELIER
> wrote:
>> >> Good news ! It worked, check the picture here :
>> >>
>> >> http://img63.im
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:19 PM, David DEMELIER
wrote:
> 2010/6/11 John Baldwin :
>> On Friday 11 June 2010 6:27:48 am Giovanni Trematerra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Giovanni Trematerra
>>> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:35 PM, David DEMELIER
>> wrote:
>>> >> Good news
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Yes, I hoped that Mikolaj ends up with something similar :). Please note
that this is racy, since we cannot know why usecount is greater then 1.
This might cause the silly rename to kick in some time where it should
not, but the race is rare.
I'd
Hello!
I'm trying to start the experimental NFSv4 server in RELENG_8 w/o
building it into the kernel, as nfsv4(4) suggests:
... or start mountd(8) and nfsd(8) with the ``-e'' option to force use of the
experimental server. The nfsuserd(8) daemon must also be running. This
will occur
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
Hello!
I'm trying to start the experimental NFSv4 server in RELENG_8 w/o
building it into the kernel, as nfsv4(4) suggests:
... or start mountd(8) and nfsd(8) with the ``-e'' option to force use of the
experimental server. The nfsuserd(8
Guy Helmer wrote:
> My previous understanding was that RFC 3927 did not allow transmitting
> datagrams involving the 169.254.0.0/16 link-local prefix; now that I've
> looked over the RFC more closely, I'm not sure that is the case.
>
> I have cc'ed Bruce Simpson on this message in hopes that he
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 07:06:11PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>
> >
> >Yes, I hoped that Mikolaj ends up with something similar :). Please note
> >that this is racy, since we cannot know why usecount is greater then 1.
> >This might cause the sil
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:08:31PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
>
> >Hello!
> >
> > I'm trying to start the experimental NFSv4 server in RELENG_8 w/o
> >building it into the kernel, as nfsv4(4) suggests:
> >
> >... or start mountd(8) and nfsd(
13 matches
Mail list logo
