"Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> ... TCC and throttling ...
> they were intended for thermal management, not power management.
Shouldn't the two be equivalent? Heat generated is directly related
to power consumed.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
h
On 13.05.2010 06:46, Andy Dills wrote:
>
> I'm working on getting p0f integrated with amavisd-new. Everything is
> great, with the exception that I can't get the neccessary commands to
> execute on boot.
>
> I started with rc.local and that didn't work. So I made this simple script
> in /usr/l
> Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 00:09:05 -0700
> From: per...@pluto.rain.com
>
> "Kevin Oberman" wrote:
>
> > ... TCC and throttling ...
> > they were intended for thermal management, not power management.
>
> Shouldn't the two be equivalent? Heat generated is directly related
> to power consumed.
T
On 05/13/10 01:50, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> Perhaps, your "BEFORE: securelevel" may be a culprit, it's too early
> to run something from /usr/local/bin.
securelevel is one of the last things to run, and must run after all the
file systems are mounted.
Doug
--
... and that's just a
rihad writes:
| Hi, I'm thinking of enabling the watchdog on our Dell PowerEdge 2950 /
| FreeBSD 8.0 amd64, so that it reboots the machine in case of lockups.
| Right now it doesn't work:
|
| # watchdog
| watchdog: patting the dog: Operation not supported
| #
| Looking through the kernel configur
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2010/5/12 David DEMELIER :
>>> I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
>>> morning) and it does not panic now. It's really odd. If it reappears
>>> soon I will t
2010/5/14 Giovanni Trematerra :
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Brandon Gooch
> wrote:
>> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2010/5/12 David DEMELIER :
I remove the patch, and built the kernel (I updated the src this
morning) and it does not panic now. It's reall
Hello,
I recently reinstalled FreeBSD 8.0 on my computer, after a long hiatus
(last version before that was 7-CURRENT before 7.0-RELEASE, on an old
computer). I read a lot of documentation to try and make sure I caught
up with any important changes before messing too much with the system.
I did a
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:00:38PM -0300, Fred Souza wrote:
> I did a similar procedure as I used to on the old system, grabbed a
> fresh ports.tar.gz, uncompressed it under /usr, installed cvsup and
> proceeded to updating /usr/src to -STABLE (using the RELENG_8 tag). So
> far, so good.
1) We use
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:00:38PM -0300, Fred Souza wrote:
> I give up and reinstall (that first install had given me quite a
> headache with incorrect drive geometry [that I had to fix with a lot
> of research to get to TestDisk and GAG], so I thought it was best to
> just start fresh). I do the
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 23:51, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> 1) We use csup now, not cvsup. csup comes with the base system, so
> there's no need to install cvsup.
>
> 2) I'm not sure why you're downloading ports.tar.gz and extracting it.
> This means that /var/db/sup/ports-all won't match what's
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 00:06, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> There is probably an ata(4) device layer change which either fixes (yes
> really), breaks (possibly), or enhances (likely) support for your ATA or
> SATA controller. This is pretty much how the ata(4) layer has behaved
> for years upon years
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:16:47AM -0300, Fred Souza wrote:
> > I'd recommend booting/trying an actual 8.0-STABLE snapshot image from
> > here:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/201004/
> >
> > This will allow you to boot and install 8.0-STABLE on your system. You
> > should see
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 00:25, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Absolutely. I've done it myself many times over the years, including
> remotely over serial console. However, you said you did that then typed
> "exit" rather than "reboot", and the end result was a kernel panic.
Yes, I should have given i
I'm reposting this over here at the suggestion of the Forums moderator.
The original post is at http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=14163
Got an interesting crash just now (well, as interesting as a crash on a
soon-to-be production system can be).
This is 8-STABLE/amd64, last cvsup'd ea
On 05/14/2010 04:13 AM, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
rihad writes:
| Hi, I'm thinking of enabling the watchdog on our Dell PowerEdge 2950 /
| FreeBSD 8.0 amd64, so that it reboots the machine in case of lockups.
| Right now it doesn't work:
|
| # watchdog
| watchdog: patting the dog: Operation not suppor
on 14/05/2010 03:25 Giovanni Trematerra said the following:
> Attilio and I came up with this patch. It seems ready for stress
> testing and review
> Please test and report back.
It seems that there is inconsistent indentation for some of new lines.
Original style seems to be softtabstop=4 tabstop
17 matches
Mail list logo
