Re: Results of BIND RFC

2010-04-03 Thread Arseny Nasokin
On 2 Apr 2010, at 23:07, Doug Barton wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 So first of all, yes Virginia, this was an April Fool's Day joke. To both those for whom this post created a false sense of despair, and (perhaps more importantly) to those for whom it created a fa

Re: random FreeBSD panics

2010-04-03 Thread Masoom Shaikh
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 28 March 2010 16:42, Masoom Shaikh wrote: > >> lets assume if this is h/w problem, then how can other OSes overcome >> this ? is there a way to make FreeBSD ignore this as well, let it >> result in reasonable performance penalty. > > Very pr

Re: 8-STABLE/amd64: kernel panic after a minute of mounting xfs

2010-04-03 Thread Nezmer
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 06:11:06PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2010-Mar-25 21:32:10 +0200, Nezmer wrote: > >This is the 1st time FreeBSD panics on me. It happened after a > >minute of mounting an XFS partition. I'm not sure It's XFS but It's the > >only part of the OS I try for the 1st time. >

Re: Results of BIND RFC

2010-04-03 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 02:08:27PM -0400, Charles Sprickman typed: > Can we do sendmail next April 1? Better yet, defer all questions about moving out of the base system by referring to the Grand Discussion that'll take place *next year* on the first of april. ___

Re: random FreeBSD panics

2010-04-03 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 12:51:46 + Masoom Shaikh wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > On 28 March 2010 16:42, Masoom Shaikh wrote: > > > >> lets assume if this is h/w problem, then how can other OSes overcome > >> this ? is there a way to make FreeBSD ignore this as we

install touching mbr

2010-04-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that was on control. this options is not what I think it should, or there is really a issue here ? thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of b

Re: install touching mbr

2010-04-03 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to > leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that > was on control. this options is not what I think it should, or there > is really a issue here

Re: install touching mbr

2010-04-03 Thread Warren Block
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that was on control. this options is not what I think it s

Re: Results of BIND RFC

2010-04-03 Thread perryh
Ruben de Groot wrote: > defer all questions about moving out of the base system ... Last I knew, X was not _in_ the base system :) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send

Re: install touching mbr

2010-04-03 Thread Bruce Cran
On Saturday 03 April 2010 21:58:56 Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 05:48:12PM -0300, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > I just installed a 8.0R amd64 from memstick. when asked, I said to > > leave mbr untouched. when I rebooted, it was freebsd bootloader that > > was on control. this options