On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:41:35PM +, Krzysztof Dajka wrote:
> But still I am confused with FreeBSD naming and it's relation with
> tags which are used in standard-supfile.
Please see the following for an overview:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/introduction.html#CURRENT
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:41:35PM +, Krzysztof Dajka wrote:
> At first I didn't knew that I am upgrading to bleeding edge/developer
> branch of FreeBSD.
You're not. There seems to be some misconceptions with regards to what
the tags represent, because people's opinions get in the way (mine
i
Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see
spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly
Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform.
The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r205536: Tue Mar 23 22:19:04
CET 2010), SMP box with 8GB of RAM, Qu
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:32:40 +
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
> Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see
> spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly
> Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform.
>
> The platform is a FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE/amd64 (r
I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow
Can I use ZFS to create a multinode storage area. Multiple HDD's in
Multiple servers to create one target of, for example, //officestorage
Allowing me to expa
On 24/03/2010 15:47, Michal wrote:
> I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
> far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow
>
> Can I use ZFS to create a multinode storage area. Multiple HDD's in
> Multiple servers to create one target of, for
Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 24/03/2010 15:47, Michal wrote:
I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow
Can I use ZFS to create a multinode storage area. Multiple HDD's in
Multiple servers to create
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Michal wrote:
> I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
> far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow
>
> Can I use ZFS to create a multinode storage area. Multiple HDD's in
> Multiple servers to create one t
--On Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:20 AM -0700 Freddie Cash
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Michal wrote:
I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow
Can I use ZFS to create a multinode
On 24/03/2010 16:20, Freddie Cash wrote:
Horribly, horribly, horribly complex. But, then, that's the Linux world.
> :)
Yes I know, it's not very clean, but was trying to gather ideas and I
found that
>
> Server 1: bunch of disks exported via iSCSI
> Server 2: bunch of disks exported via iSCS
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Michael Loftis wrote:
> --On Wednesday, March 24, 2010 9:20 AM -0700 Freddie Cash <
> fjwc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Michal wrote:
>
>>
>> I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
>>> far easier, if i
--On Wednesday, March 24, 2010 5:12 PM + Michal
wrote:
If you were to do something like this, I'd make sure to have a fast
local ZIL (log) device on the head node. That would reduce latency
for writes, you might also do the same for reads. Then your bulk
storage comes from the iSCSI
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Michal wrote:
> This is pretty much what I have been looking for, I don't mind using a
> SAN Controller server in which to deal with all of this in fact I
> expected that, but I wanted to present the disks from a server full of
> HDD's (which in effect is just a
On 24/03/2010 17:14, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
> Yes, that would be helpful (mirrored slogs, until we get slog removal
> support).
>
> As would an L2ARC (cache) device in the head node.
>
> As well as lots and lots and lots of RAM.
>
> And as fast of ethernet NICs as you can get between the head n
At 07:55 PM 3/22/2010, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote:
>
>On Mon, March 22, 2010 19:57, John Long wrote:
>>dmesg shows
>>cpu0: on acpi0
>>est0: on cpu0
>>est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized.
>>est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 6160b2506000b25
>>device_attach:
At 11:27 PM 3/22/2010, Alexander Motin wrote:
>John Long wrote:
>>Hello, I am putting together a couple update servers. Went with c2d
>>E7500 on gigabyte G41M-ES2L boards. fbsd 8.0 release generic (so far)
>>amd64, 1g mem, 1tb wd cavier blk, fresh system.
>>My Kill-a-watt shows 41
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 01:37:06PM -0700, John Long wrote:
> I am trying to ascertain the viability of this motherboard w/
> regards to getting the power function working proper and am
> constrained by the lack of monitoring tools vs what cupid.com has
> for win with hwmonitor and cpuz (they have a
Thanks a lot for clarifying. I think that I'm going to stick with
STABLE release, as it reflects my expectations and time I can dedicate
to tinker with my system.
For some while I thought that I would return to Debian, because I
became used to it's pros and cons. Thanks to experience I gained in
Freddie Cash wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Michal wrote:
I wrote a really long e-mail but realised I could ask this question far
far easier, if it doesn't make sense, the original e-mail is bellow
Can I use ZFS to create a multinode storage area. Multiple HDD's in
Multiple servers t
Michal wrote:
On 24/03/2010 17:14, Freddie Cash wrote:
Yes, that would be helpful (mirrored slogs, until we get slog removal
support).
As would an L2ARC (cache) device in the head node.
As well as lots and lots and lots of RAM.
And as fast of ethernet NICs as you can get between the head no
On 24/03/2010 22:19, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> For what it's worth - I think this is a good idea! iSCSI and ZFS make it
> extraordinarily flexible to do this. You can have a RAIS - redundant
> array of inexpensive servers :)
>
> For example: each server box hosts 8-12 drives - use a hardware
> contr
On 03/24/10 15:06, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 13:32:40 +
"O. Hartmann" wrote:
Since the introduction of Thunderbird 3.0 and Firefox 3.6 I see
spontanous crashes/coredumps of both thunderbird and firefox. Interingly
Firefox 3.5.X works well on he same platform.
The platform
Quoth Michal :
>
> I do aswell :D The thing is, I see it two ways; I worked for a a huge
> online betting company, and we had the money for HP MSA's and big
> expensive SAN's, then we have a lot of SMB's with no where near the
> budget for that but the same problem with lots of data and the need f
At 02:36 PM 3/24/2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 01:37:06PM -0700, John Long wrote:
>> I am trying to ascertain the viability of this motherboard w/
>> regards to getting the power function working proper and am
>> constrained by the lack of monitoring tools vs what cupid.com
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 06:04:51PM -0700 I heard the voice of
John Long, and lo! it spake thus:
>
>> The i3/i5/i7 chips don't appear to offer ECC framework on their
>> memory controllers (which are now on-die as I'm sure you know),
>> which is why I plan to stay away from them for servers.
>
> I ag
Moved from another thread
>> I csupd to stable amd64 8.0 and rebuilt then noticed from dmesg that I
went from SATA150 (it should be SATA300) to >> udma100 SATA.
>
>This is a bug/quirk of some changes in ata(4). Your drive should be
>operating at full SATA speed (probably SATA300). You can brin
On Mar 24, 2010, at 19:45, Michal wrote:
It's all well and good having 1 ZFS server, but it's fragile in the
the sense of no redundancy, then we have 1 ZFS server and a 2nd with
DRBD, but that's a waste of money...think 12 TB, and you need to pay
for another 12TB box for redundancy, and yo
27 matches
Mail list logo
