Quoting Borja Marcos (from Thu, 11 Mar 2010
18:26:09 +0100):
Of course CPUs have bugs, I don't doubt it. I was just wondering how
I coud reproduce the problem with a different hardware :) That's why
I said it was unlikely.
Besides, such a low level fault should produce many more problems
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 08:33:29PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I've done a few RELENG_8_0 to STABLE-8 to 9-CURRENT upgrades lately
> and mergemaster was goofing up the contents a bit based on the RCS
> versions. I had to hand-edit a crapload of stuff going from 8 to 9,
> and I still don't trus
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:53:43 -0500
> From: st...@ibctech.ca
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> CC: freebsd-j...@freebsd.org
> Subject: Jails & 8.0
>
> Sorry for the cross-post, but this is a 'thank-you', not a request for help.
>
> I want to express my
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:39:16PM +0100, Kai Gallasch wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I have some trouble with an opteron server locking up spontaneously. It looses
> all networks connectivity and even through console I can get no shell.
>
> Lockups occur mostly under disk load (periodic daily, bacula backup
>
Hello,
I'm having "interrupt storm detected" messages on a Dell Inspiron
580 running up-to-date 8-STABLE (amd64 arch). The interrupts seem
to come from one of the atapci controllers, apparently atapci0 (main
controller, with a SATA disk and an ATAPI optical drive).
ata_interrupt gets called at a
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:14:09PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> I'm having "interrupt storm detected" messages on a Dell Inspiron
> 580 running up-to-date 8-STABLE (amd64 arch). The interrupts seem
> to come from one of the atapci controllers, apparently atapci0 (main
> controller, with a SATA di
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:18:32AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> I'm a little confused by the kernel output. It appears as if you're
> using the new SATA-to-CAM layer (ahci.ko) for your SATA disks, rather
> than the ataahci.ko layer... but I don't see any indication of AHCI
> being available/use
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:57:44PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> > Possibly this is the source of the problem (specifically, it looks like
> > FreeBSD doesn't have proper device ID knowledge of what this controller
> > is. I believe that's because this system is *very* new, a Core i3/i5/i7
> > sy
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:09:36AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > + { 0x3b208086, 0, INTEL_AHCI, 0, ATA_SA300, "PCH" },
> > + { 0x3b268086, 0, INTEL_AHCI, 0, ATA_SA300, "PCH" },
> Device ID 0x3b20
> - PCH SATA controller
> - Desktop revision, non-AHCI and non-RAID
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 01:14:09PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having "interrupt storm detected" messages on a Dell Inspiron
> 580 running up-to-date 8-STABLE (amd64 arch). The interrupts seem
> to come from one of the atapci controllers, apparently atapci0 (main
> controller, wi
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:46:55AM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> This is not related with your interrupt storm issue but something
> is wrong here. I think brgphy(4) should be used for bge(4). Have no
> idea why the OUI has a different value.
> Would you try attached patch and let me know whether
I just installed 7.3-RC2 amd64 on new server.
I created slice s1 (80GB on disk ad4 (500GB), then partitions for system
(/, swap, /var, /usr, /tmp) by sysinstall.
After base install I created gmirror gm0 as usual (I did it many times).
Now I am no longer in datacenter and have only ssh access
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:39:16PM +0100, Kai Gallasch wrote:
>> I have some trouble with an opteron server locking up spontaneously. It
>> looses
>> all networks connectivity and even through console I can get no shell.
>>
>> Lockups occur mostly under disk load (peri
With multiple FIB support generally available in FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE it
would be quite beneficial to have the ability to build routing tables in
secondary FIBs as well as start certain applications in certain FIBs
from within rc.conf(5).
I've done some poking around and came across two PRs whi
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:57:44PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
>>> Possibly this is the source of the problem (specifically, it looks like
>>> FreeBSD doesn't have proper device ID knowledge of what this controller
>>> is. I believe that's because this system is *very* ne
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:21:34PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:46:55AM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > This is not related with your interrupt storm issue but something
> > is wrong here. I think brgphy(4) should be used for bge(4). Have no
> > idea why the OUI has a
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Except ICH6 Intel uses separate IDs for AHCI and non-AHCI SATA
> controller modes. So this flag is not completely correct. But probably
> it shoudn't be just removed, as it is checked in other place. I know
> about this and going to
Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Except ICH6 Intel uses separate IDs for AHCI and non-AHCI SATA
>> controller modes. So this flag is not completely correct. But probably
>> it shoudn't be just removed, as it is checked in other place. I kno
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:27:59PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:59:32PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> > Except ICH6 Intel uses separate IDs for AHCI and non-AHCI SATA
> > controller modes. So this flag is not completely correct. But probably
> > it shoudn't be just re
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:45:24PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:21:44AM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > No, it seems there is other issue in brgphy(4). I noticed brgphy(4)
> > blindly try to set jumbo frame related registers. I guess the PHY
> > may not have the regist
Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:38:31 +0200
schrieb Alexander Motin :
> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:39:16PM +0100, Kai Gallasch wrote:
> >> I have some trouble with an opteron server locking up
> >> spontaneously. It looses all networks connectivity and even
> >> through conso
Kai Gallasch wrote:
> Am Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:38:31 +0200
> schrieb Alexander Motin :
>> Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>>> I was analizing similar problem as potential ZFS bug. It turned out
>>> to be bug in ciss(4) and I believe mav@ (CCed) has fix for that.
>> That my patch is already at 8-STABLE sin
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 09:28:52PM +0100, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:02:24PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > Hmm, try this one and let me know it make any differences.
>
> No, still the same, negotiates at 10baseT/UTP.
It seems the PHY has no BRGPHY_MII_AUXSTS register as
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Steve Polyack wrote:
> With multiple FIB support generally available in FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE it
> would be quite beneficial to have the ability to build routing tables in
> secondary FIBs as well as start certain applications in certain FIBs from
> within rc.conf(5
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:39:53AM +1100, Jeff Dowsley wrote:
> Gentles
>
> I have an old HP Pavillion DV6000 laptop, which has a Broadcom USB
> wireless device. Worked under Windows Vista. I installed freeBSD 8-
> stable, and see as the last line in dmesg
>
> ugen2.2: at usbus2
>
> Ferret
25 matches
Mail list logo
