Re: Many processes stuck in zfs

On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Pawel Jakub Dawidek (from Wed, 10 Mar 2010 > 18:31:43 +0100): > > There is a 4th possibility, if you can rule out everything else: bugs in the > CPU. I stumbled upon this with ZFS (but UFS was exposing the problem much > faste

Re: Many processes stuck in zfs

Quoting Borja Marcos (from Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:54:47 +0100): On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:45 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Pawel Jakub Dawidek (from Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:31:43 +0100): There is a 4th possibility, if you can rule out everything else: bugs in the CPU. I stumbled upon t

Re: Many processes stuck in zfs

Quoting Ivan Voras (from Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:59:01 +0100): On 03/11/10 09:54, Borja Marcos wrote: I don't know about the rest but this: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (2496.25-MHz K8-class CPU) does not agree with this: FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 8 core(s) T

Re: Many processes stuck in zfs

On 03/11/10 15:09, Alexander Leidinger wrote: Quoting Ivan Voras (from Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:59:01 +0100): On 03/11/10 09:54, Borja Marcos wrote: I don't know about the rest but this: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (2496.25-MHz K8-class CPU) does not agree with this: FreeBSD/S

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2010-02-12 20:33:34 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-02-12 20:33:34 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-02-12 20:33:34 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-02-12 20:34:04 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-02-12 20:34:04 - /usr/bi

[releng_6 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2010-02-12 20:14:26 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-legacy.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-02-12 20:14:26 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-02-12 20:14:26 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-02-12 20:15:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-02-12 20:15:02 - /usr/

Re: Many processes stuck in zfs

On Mar 11, 2010, at 3:08 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >>> Borja, can you confirm that the CPU is correctly announced in FreeBSD (just >>> look at "dmesg | grep CPU:" output, if it tells you it is a AMD or Intel >>> XXX CPU it is correctly detected by the BIOS)? >> >> A CPU bug? Weird. Very.

Re: proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10)

On 03/11/10 04:39, Kai Gallasch wrote: > Hi. > > I have some trouble with an opteron server locking up spontaneously. It looses > all networks connectivity and even through console I can get no shell. > > Lockups occur mostly under disk load (periodic daily, bacula backup > running, make buildwor

Re: proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10)

on 11/03/2010 20:25 Mark Atkinson said the following: > On 03/11/10 04:39, Kai Gallasch wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I have some trouble with an opteron server locking up spontaneously. It >> looses >> all networks connectivity and even through console I can get no shell. >> >> Lockups occur mostly under d

make installworld problem

suddenly after a while my FreeBSD 8.0 stable machine always fails make installworld. it has rarely been a problem before and when I appeared I just rebooted into multi user, csup and build it all once again and then success. Now It always fails with an error saying this or that directory is

I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

Hi all, please forgive the verbosity, but I wanted to include as much detail as possible (without including config files) up front. Summary: SSH works to the jail box host OS, but not to the jails themselves. On a box that is dedicated to jails, I source upgraded from 7.2 to: FreeBSD jail.eagle.

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

Sounds like you have something wrong with devfs.rules in jail section? On Mar 11, 2010 6:46 PM, "Steve Bertrand" wrote: Hi all, please forgive the verbosity, but I wanted to include as much detail as possible (without including config files) up front. Summary: SSH works to the jail box host OS,

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On 2010.03.11 21:49, Xin LI wrote: > Sounds like you have something wrong with devfs.rules in jail section? Did I miss or fsck something up by not reading UPDATING properly? Here is what I have on the host OS: %cat /etc/defaults/devfs.rules | grep -v "^#" [devfsrules_hide_all=1] add hide [devf

Re: make installworld problem

On 2010.03.11 16:41, Kenneth Hatteland wrote: > suddenly after a while my FreeBSD 8.0 stable machine always fails make > installworld. it has rarely been a problem before and when I appeared I > just rebooted into multi user, csup and build it all once again and then > success. > > Now It always f

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

Looks like you have a stale configuration. DId you done mergemaster? Cheers, -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebs

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On 2010.03.11 22:14, Xin LI wrote: > Looks like you have a stale configuration. DId you done mergemaster? Yes. I performed it as such: # mergemaster -Uia under the host OS, and then subsequently within each jail. I'm not very familiar with mergemaster, so could my use of the args been incorrec

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On 2010.03.11 22:14, Steve Bertrand wrote: > I had even used diff(8) earlier, err, diff(1) ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On 2010.03.11 21:49, Xin LI wrote: > Sounds like you have something wrong with devfs.rules in jail section? Heh, Thanks Xin LI, I knew the cluebat would work ;) This line: "add path pts unhide" ...I had added to the jails, but NOT to the host /etc/defaults/devfs.rules. It took me sending a cat

Jails & 8.0

Sorry for the cross-post, but this is a 'thank-you', not a request for help. I want to express my sincere appreciation for all of those who made FreeBSD jails a viable virtual server solution for us who required multiple IPs, particularly those who demand/require IPv6 support: %jls -v JID Hos

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file... What does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules' show? Cheers, - -- Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ve

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On 2010.03.11 22:54, Xin LI wrote: > Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file... What > does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules' show? ...not necessarily 8_0: %grep tag /etc/supfile *default tag=RELENG_8 fwiw: %ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules /etc/defaults/devfs.rules:

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/03/11 20:26, Steve Bertrand wrote: > On 2010.03.11 22:54, Xin LI wrote: >> Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file... What >> does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules' show? > > ...not necessarily 8_0: > > %grep tag /etc/sup

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: > On 2010.03.11 22:54, Xin LI wrote: >> Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file...  What >> does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules' show? > > ...not necessarily 8_0: > > %grep tag /etc/supfile > > *default tag=RELENG_8 > > f

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On 2010.03.11 23:30, Xin LI wrote: > On 2010/03/11 20:26, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> On 2010.03.11 22:54, Xin LI wrote: >>> Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file... What >>> does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules' show? > >> ...not necessarily 8_0: > >> %grep tag /etc/supfile

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2010/03/11 20:33, Garrett Cooper wrote: > I've done a few RELENG_8_0 to STABLE-8 to 9-CURRENT upgrades lately > and mergemaster was goofing up the contents a bit based on the RCS > versions. I had to hand-edit a crapload of stuff going from 8 to 9,

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On 2010.03.11 23:33, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:26 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> On 2010.03.11 22:54, Xin LI wrote: >>> Weird, it seems that RELENG_8_0 do contain the correct file... What >>> does 'ident /etc/defaults/devfs.rules' show? >> >> ...not necessarily 8_0: >> >> %g

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On 2010.03.11 23:41, Xin LI wrote: > On 2010/03/11 20:33, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> I've done a few RELENG_8_0 to STABLE-8 to 9-CURRENT upgrades lately >> and mergemaster was goofing up the contents a bit based on the RCS >> versions. I had to hand-edit a crapload of stuff going from 8 to 9, >> and

Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade

On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 2010/03/11 20:33, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> I've done a few RELENG_8_0 to STABLE-8 to 9-CURRENT upgrades lately >> and mergemaster was goofing up the contents a bit based on the RCS >> versions.