ntpd tracks interface updates, however it does not requery
servers, when they occur. This was less than an hour ago,
at my university, the notebook boots and is not connected
to anything:
9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: logging to file /var/log/ntpd
9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: precision = 2.234 usec
Quoting John Baldwin (from Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:00:12 -0500):
On Saturday 06 March 2010 11:00:12 am Robert Watson wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> Take a look at the DTrace configuration information here:
>>
>>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook
On 8 March 2010, at 12:33, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> I run a number of 4 core systems with em interfaces. These are production
>> systems that are unmanned and located a long way from me. Under unusual
>> conditions it can take up to 6 hours to get
Thanks for your kind reply, I'm forwarding it there...
Original Message
Subject:Re: NFS Client error
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:59:29 +0100
From: vol...@vwsoft.com
To: Giulio Ferro
CC: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org, freebsd-...@freebsd.org
On 03/08/10 12:16
> Thanks for your kind reply, I'm forwarding it there...
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: NFS Client error
> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:59:29 +0100
> From: vol...@vwsoft.com
> To: Giulio Ferro
> CC: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org, freebsd-...@freebsd.o
Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed machines
having more and more processes stuck in the zfs wchan. The processes never
recover from that, and trying to reboot only gets the entire system stuck,
without any console messages. I can enter the debugger, and I have
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:06:10PM -0500, Steve Polyack wrote:
> ZFS in FreeBSD lacks at least one major feature from the Solaris
> version: hot spares. There is a PR open at
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=134491, but there hasn't been
> any motion/thoughts posted on it since its
On 09.03.2010 10:14, Daniel Braniss wrote:
Thanks for your kind reply, I'm forwarding it there...
Original Message
Subject:Re: NFS Client error
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:59:29 +0100
From: vol...@vwsoft.com
To: Giulio Ferro
CC: freebsd-hack...@freebsd.org, f
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> ntpd tracks interface updates, however it does not requery
> servers, when they occur. This was less than an hour ago,
> at my university, the notebook boots and is not connected
> to anything:
>
> 9 Mar 08:07:17 ntpd[1510]: logging to file /var/
Le Tue, 9 Mar 2010 10:15:53 +0100,
Stefan Bethke a écrit :
> Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed
> machines having more and more processes stuck in the zfs wchan. The
> processes never recover from that, and trying to reboot only gets the
> entire system stuck, w
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:27:35PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > ntpd tracks interface updates, however it does not requery
> > servers, when they occur. This was less than an hour ago,
> > at my university, the notebook boots and is not connected
> >
On 2010-Mar-09 10:15:53 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed machines
>having more and more processes stuck in the zfs wchan. The processes never
>recover from that,
How long have you waited?
There seems to be a problem with low fre
The system panic with error kernel: em0: discard frame w/o packet header
Crach dump one
kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.5
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0xd9c6f105
fault code = supervisor read, page not prese
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:15:53AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed machines
> having more and more processes stuck in the zfs wchan. The processes never
> recover from that, and trying to reboot only gets the entire system stuck,
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 02:17:48PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 11:27, Ian Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > > ntpd tracks interface updates, however it does not requery
> > > servers, when they occur. This was less than an hour ago,
> > > at my uni
Am 09.03.2010 um 11:53 schrieb Peter Jeremy:
> On 2010-Mar-09 10:15:53 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed
>> machines having more and more processes stuck in the zfs wchan. The
>> processes never recover from that,
>
> How long
On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:58 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>>> What kind of hardware do you have there? There is 3-way deadlock I've a
>>> fix for which would be hard to trigger on single or dual core machines.
>>>
>>> Feel free to try the fix:
>>>
>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/zfs
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 3:27:09 am Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting John Baldwin (from Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:00:12 -0500):
>
> > On Saturday 06 March 2010 11:00:12 am Robert Watson wrote:
> >> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >>
> >> >> Take a look at the DTrace configuration in
On 09/03/2010 11:27, Ian Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > ntpd tracks interface updates, however it does not requery
> > servers, when they occur. This was less than an hour ago,
> > at my university, the notebook boots and is not connected
> > to anything:
> >
>
Am 09.03.2010 um 13:29 schrieb Pawel Jakub Dawidek:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:15:53AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed
>> machines having more and more processes stuck in the zfs wchan. The
>> processes never recover from tha
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:57:07PM +0100, Borja Marcos wrote:
>
> On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:15:53AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >> Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed
> >> machines having more and mo
On Mar 9, 2010, at 1:29 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:15:53AM +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
>> Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed
>> machines having more and more processes stuck in the zfs wchan. The
>> processes never recover from
Quoting John Baldwin (from Tue, 9 Mar 2010 07:47:00 -0500):
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 3:27:09 am Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting John Baldwin (from Mon, 8 Mar 2010
10:00:12 -0500):
> On Saturday 06 March 2010 11:00:12 am Robert Watson wrote:
>> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Alexander Leidinger wro
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:30:45AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 02:17:48PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > On 09/03/2010 11:27, Ian Smith wrote:
> > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> > > > ntpd tracks interface updates, however it does not requery
> > > >
On Mar 9, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> From this you can see that sys.mk is included and parsed before 'Makefile',
>> so the WITH_CTF=yes is not set until after sys.mk has been parsed.
>
> I think we need to find a different solution for this. The need to specify
> WITH_CTF a
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:27:35PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
[..]
> > Yes, but it looks more like name service that's not operating, ntpd
> > seems to be doing its best but can't resolve the hostnames?
Right smell, wrong pooch :) Thanks for the point
On 03/09/10 05:11, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 03/08/10 19:06, Steve Polyack wrote:
ZFS in FreeBSD lacks at least one major feature from the Solaris
version: hot spares. There is a PR open at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=134491, but there hasn't been
any motion/thoughts posted on it since
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:00:49AM +0800, Linghua Tseng wrote:
> Here is the output of `diff -u /usr/src/etc/nsswitch.conf
> /etc/nsswitch.conf'.
> --- /usr/src/etc/nsswitch.conf 2010-03-08 09:04:25.0 +0800
> +++ /etc/nsswitch.conf 2010-03-08 18:01:08.0 +0800
> @@ -1,13 +1,13 @
> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:33:09 -0800
> From: Jeremy Chadwick
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:32:47AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > I have discovered a problem with the mail sent by cron jobs (I refer
> > only to logs, not invocations of mail from scri
> Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 21:53:55 +1100
> From: Peter Jeremy
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> On 2010-Mar-09 10:15:53 +0100, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> >Over the past couple of months, I've more or less regularly observed
> >machines having more and more processes stuck in the zfs wcha
Sigh. My brain is fried. I replied to the wrong thread. Pleas ignore this.
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: ober...@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 0
> Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:33:09 -0800
> From: Jeremy Chadwick
> Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org
>
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:32:47AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > I have discovered a problem with the mail sent by cron jobs (I refer
> > only to logs, not invocations of mail from scri
If FreeBSD7 there was ugen.ko kernel module and I can use apcupsd with USB
devices, but in FreeBSD there is no such module, how can I use APC power supply
with usb interface (I mean usage of the apcupsd port)?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
In the last episode (Mar 10):
> In FreeBSD7 there was ugen.ko kernel module and I can use apcupsd with USB
> devices, but in FreeBSD there is no such module, how can I use APC power
> supply with usb interface (I mean usage of the apcupsd port)?
It's built into the usb subsystem now. All USB devi
Thanks.
I have tried to modify my /etc/nsswitch.conf to:
group: compat
group_compat: ldap
hosts: files dns
networks: files
passwd: compat
passwd_compat: ldap
shells: files
services: compat
services_compat: nis
protocols: files
rpc: files
But the problem is still occurred.
-
35 matches
Mail list logo
