>
> First off, I know that cross posting is evil, but I wanted to try
> and make sure developers saw it.
>
> On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Olaf Seibert wrote:
>
> > I see an annoying behaviour with NFS over TCP. It happens both with nfs
> > and newnfs. This is with FreeBSD/amd64 8.0-RC1 as client. The se
Hi,
Somewhere between r198312 and r198702 I started getting this message
during boot, on a machine using serial console:
WARNING: console at 0xc093cea0 has no name
This is just before the copyright banner of the kernel. Does anybody
have an idea what might cause this, before I start digging? :)
On 2009-10-31 14:14, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Somewhere between r198312 and r198702 I started getting this message
> during boot, on a machine using serial console:
>
> WARNING: console at 0xc093cea0 has no name
Okay, this seems to be caused by r198655, which is an MFC of r197570,
where experiment
I'm trying to setup an AP with a run0 interface on latest 8-STABLE but
apparently 802.11 association fails:
Oct 31 16:21:30 ursaminor hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:22:69:07:30:9e IEEE
802.11: associated
Oct 31 16:21:33 ursaminor hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:22:69:07:30:9e IEEE
802.11: deauthenticated due to lo
Hi,
Your patch has been committed to USB P4:
http://p4web.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=170003
Thanks for reporting!
--HPS
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
On Saturday 31 October 2009 15:53:53 Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2009-10-31 14:14, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > Somewhere between r198312 and r198702 I started getting this message
> > during boot, on a machine using serial console:
> >
> > WARNING: console at 0xc093cea0 has no name
>
> Okay, this seem
On 10/31/09, Ivan Voras wrote:
> I'm trying to setup an AP with a run0 interface on latest 8-STABLE but
> apparently 802.11 association fails:
>
> Oct 31 16:21:30 ursaminor hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:22:69:07:30:9e IEEE
> 802.11: associated
> Oct 31 16:21:33 ursaminor hostapd: wlan0: STA 00:22:69:07:3
Hello list!
I have a small question from CVE-2009-0689[1]:
The commit r197059 fixed this bug or not?
On security lists its marked as high priority and find it at juni.
some info:
[1] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0689
[2] http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityale
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 06:23:51PM -0700, Norbert Papke wrote:
> On October 30, 2009, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 09:56:19PM -0700, Norbert Papke wrote:
> > > This occurred shortly after "scp"ing from a VirtualBox VM to the host.
> > > The file transfer got stuck. The "re" i
