Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Errata Notice FreeBSD-EN-09:05.null

2009-10-07 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Corrected: 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_8, 8.0-RC2) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7, 7.2-STABLE) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7_2, 7.2-RELEASE-p4) 2009-10-02 18:09:56 UTC (RELENG_7_1, 7.1

Installing Cacti from Ports

2009-10-07 Thread mailinglist
I hada VM running an older installation of FreeBSD 7.2. I recently got back to it and tried to install Cacti from the ports collection. I cvsup'd in an up-to-date ports collection, and did the usual "make, make install" for Cacti. During the "make install" process a dependency failed to build

samba - SIGABRT

2009-10-07 Thread Oliver Lehmann
Hi, I wonder what may have caused this and how should I debug it to find the source? I Installed samba 3.3.7 on a clean 8.0-RC1 and I upgraded then my system to the latest RELENG_8. Since I've not the time searching much longer for the error I'll just go to upgrade to 3.3.8 (recompile it...) tomor

RE: Installing Cacti from Ports

2009-10-07 Thread mailinglist
As part of the "freebsd-update" process I did run a few portupgrade commands. But I thought portupgrade only did whatever it does to installed ports. Or are you saying it upgraded the xcb port which allowed Cacti to build to completion? Also, off topic I know, but what is the proper way to rep

Re: Installing Cacti from Ports

2009-10-07 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:31 PM, mailinglist wrote: > I hada VM running an older installation of FreeBSD 7.2. I recently got > back to it and tried to install Cacti from the ports collection. I cvsup'd > in an up-to-date ports collection, and did the usual "make, make install" > for Cacti. Dur

Re: Installing Cacti from Ports

2009-10-07 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:21 PM, mailinglist wrote: > As part of the "freebsd-update" process I did run a few portupgrade > commands. But I thought portupgrade only did whatever it does to installed > ports. Or are you saying it upgraded the xcb port which allowed Cacti to > build to completion?

Re: samba - SIGABRT

2009-10-07 Thread jhell
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 20:09 +0200, lehmann@ wrote: Hi, I wonder what may have caused this and how should I debug it to find the source? I Installed samba 3.3.7 on a clean 8.0-RC1 and I upgraded then my system to the latest RELENG_8. Since I've not the time searching much longer for the error I'll

Re: samba - SIGABRT

2009-10-07 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 20:09:59 Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder what may have caused this and how should I debug it to find the > source? I Installed samba 3.3.7 on a clean 8.0-RC1 and I upgraded then my > system to the latest RELENG_8. > Since I've not the time searching much longe

Re: 8.0-RC1: kernel page fault in NLM master thread (VIMAGE or ZFS related?)

2009-10-07 Thread Jamie Gritton
Rick Macklem wrote: On Sun, 27 Sep 2009, Robert Watson wrote: On Fri, 25 Sep 2009, Jamie Gritton wrote: It seems to be NFS related. I think the null pointer in question is from the export's anonymous credential. Try the patch below and see if it helps (which I guess means run it overnight a

[SOLVED] Re: libthr and daemon()

2009-10-07 Thread Matthew Fleming
> 2) why would fork resolve to the one in libc (presumably, I'm not sure how > to prove this) instead of the one in libthr? Well, I'm not sure how the application plus libraries linked, but there was no explicit -lthr or -lpthread in the Makefile. So the resulting binary used the fork() in libc.

NDIS broken?

2009-10-07 Thread Jeff Dowsley
Folks Just upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0RC1 Under 7.2, I was using an ndis wrapper to provide a Windows network driver for an old Linksys PCMIA card (non-ath). Worked beautifully as per the Handbook under 7.2. Sadly, under 8.0RC1, the process to generate the wrapper appears to work OK, but wh

Re: NDIS broken?

2009-10-07 Thread Glen Barber
Hi On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, Jeff Dowsley wrote: > Folks > > Just upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0RC1 > > Under 7.2, I was using an ndis wrapper to provide a Windows network driver > for an old Linksys PCMIA card (non-ath). Worked beautifully as per the > Handbook under 7.2. > > Sadly, under 8.0RC1

r197748 - base/stable/7/bin/sh/ 7.2-STABLE i386

2009-10-07 Thread jhell
r197748 | jilles | 2009-10-04 13:16:11 -0400 (Sun, 04 Oct 2009) | 7 lines MFC r197371: Mention that NUL characters are not allowed in sh(1) input. I do not consider this a bug because POSIX permits it and argument string

Re: r197748 - base/stable/7/bin/sh/ 7.2-STABLE i386

2009-10-07 Thread Barney Wolff
I believe you are wrong about prior behavior. sudo is from a port and is in /usr/local/bin. Any shell is going to expand the list of args *before* giving control to the executable. So the system will churn for a while before sudo gets to ask for the password. On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 12:59:36AM

Re: samba - SIGABRT

2009-10-07 Thread Oliver Lehmann
jhell writes: Hi, This was caused by your setting of the following: security.bsd.map_at_zero=0 You can reset that value to 1 and you should be alright to operate like normal otherwise you will have to compile samba over again with the above mentioned configure options. Yeah this cause