Hi!
> > I had the same problem with beta4:
[...]
My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64.
I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and partitioning
worked.
I'll try to partition using a i386 boot cd and install using
the amd64 boot cd 8-)
It seems to be a bug with the amd64
On 2009-Sep-13 12:11:45 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
>I have configured the same mac on both cards.
This should be done automatically by lagg.
>When I disconnect the cable from xl0, the network connection dies, and my
>lagg0 looks like this:
>
>lagg0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
>
Hello,
> >What might be the problem with that setup?
>
> Both sides of a lagg need to co-operate to pass packets. You need to
> configure the switch to failover as well.
A simple LACP configuration should do?
mjb
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org maili
Hi,
* Kurt Jaeger [090915 09:34]:
> > > I had the same problem with beta4:
> [...]
> My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64.
> I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and partitioning
> worked.
> I'll try to partition using a i386 boot cd and install using
> the amd64 boo
Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the
Extracting ports:
Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started
cpuid=0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 19 tid 100045 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
I did a where but its way too much to type accurately by hand
On 15 Sep 2009, at 10:52, Doug Hardie wrote:
Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the
Extracting ports:
Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started
cpuid=0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 19 tid 100045 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
I did a where
On 15 September 2009, at 01:52, Doug Hardie wrote:
Installing 8.0 Beta 4 on an i386 machine from disc 1. IN the
Extracting ports:
Panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started
cpuid=0
KDB: enter: panic
[thread pid 19 tid 100045 ]
Stopped at kdb_enter+0x3a: movl $0,kdb_why
I did a
On 2009-Sep-15 09:50:49 +0200, Maciej Jan Broniarz wrote:
>> >What might be the problem with that setup?
>>
>> Both sides of a lagg need to co-operate to pass packets. You need to
>> configure the switch to failover as well.
>
>A simple LACP configuration should do?
Yes. I use LACP at $work.
Le Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:57:16 +1000,
Graham Menhennitt a écrit :
> I'm upgrading a Soekris net5501 from FreeBSD 7-Stable to 8-Beta4 (via
> source). I've done a buildworld, buildkernel, and installkernel. When
> I try to boot the new kernel, it stops very early on in the boot
> sequence. The serial
Kurt Jaeger writes:
> > > I had the same problem with beta4:
> [...]
>
> My previous tests were with 8.0-beta4-amd64.
>
> I now tested with 8.0-beta3-i386, this time installation and
> partitioning worked.
>
> It seems to be a bug with the amd64 code ?
That might be.
Jin Guojun writes:
> I do not enve know how to make "dangerously dedicated" disk, and
> the 8.0 may do this sliently.
I was told in private conversation "dangerously dedicated" mode
is currently broken (at least with regards to installation), and
that it was removed as an option betwe
Hi,
Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems
with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore.
In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d
scripts at the bottom. Is there a way for me to increase the verbosity?
Ronald
Hi.
Have I overlooked something, or is it not possible with newsyslog to run a
certain command after log rotation? :-(
It looks like the patch mentioned here
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/current/2006-06/msg00575.html
never made it into the FreeBSD distribution?
Bummer ...
--
Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi,
Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems
with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore.
In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d
scripts at the bottom. Is there a way for me to increase the
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:59:46 +0200, Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz>
wrote:
Ronald Klop wrote:
Hi,
Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some
problems with them, but the default output gives me no information
anymore.
In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about
Hi folks. Need help in doing the following, but first want to check
and see if it is feasible with the latest Release, or if I'm just going to
be spinning my wheels on this one.
The Objective.
==
I have a FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE system which I want to upgrade to 7.X
from the sour
Hi,
Reference:
> From: Rom Albuquerque
> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:38:16 +
> Message-id:
Rom Albuquerque wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi folks. Need help in doing the following, but first want to check
> and see if it is feasible with the latest Release, or if I'm just going to
On 2009-09-15 16:37, Ronald Klop wrote:
> Since I run 8.0 the rc.d scripts are less verbose. I have some problems
> with them, but the default output gives me no information anymore.
>
> In the 8.0-TODO wiki there is a mention about verbosity of the rc.d
> scripts at the bottom. Is there a way
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 01:24:37PM +1000, Dave Hardman wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:40:52PM +0200, Patrick Lamaiziere
> wrote:
> > Le Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:29:58 +1000, Dave Hardman
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > I upgraded from 7.2 to 8.0-BETA4. Now X will not receive
> > > input from eith
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 05:38:16PM +, Rom Albuquerque wrote:
> to halt. So, 4.9 is installed and working, is there a source level
> backward compatibility issue between 7.x and anything older than 6.0 ?
> In other words, upgrading from the sources with such an old
> distribution is a doable tas
20 matches
Mail list logo
