8.0-BETA3 cannot mount root while booting from USB HDD: no da0

2009-08-27 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Hi! I'm trying to boot FreeBSD 8.0-BETA3 from USB HDD, GENERIC kernel. It loads and initializes just fine, detects all devices just right, including umass0 for USB HDD. However, it does not create da0 and cannot mount root filesystem, bailing out to "mountroot>" prompt. It does not list da0 if I

Re: Broadcom BCM5784M Support ?

2009-08-27 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
On Thursday 30 July 2009 5:05:05 pm Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > Can anyone point me to patches to support this broadcom device on > fbsd 7.2 ? > > no...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x11651734 > chip=0x169814e4 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > class = netwo

Re: Broadcom BCM5784M Support ?

2009-08-27 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hello, > > Can anyone point me to patches to support this broadcom device on > > fbsd 7.2 ? > > > > no...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x11651734 > > chip=0x169814e4 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > > class = network > > subclass = ethernet > > > > Wh

Re: Broadcom BCM5784M Support ?

2009-08-27 Thread Gonzalo Nemmi
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hello, > > > > Can anyone point me to patches to support this broadcom device on > > > fbsd 7.2 ? > > > > > > no...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x11651734 > > > chip=0x169814e4 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' >

Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion

2009-08-27 Thread Skip Ford
Doug Barton wrote: > Skip Ford wrote: > > Doug Barton wrote: > >> Second, without knowing what command line you used I couldn't tell you > >> for sure what happened of course, but assuming you used some > >> combination of '-af' what you saw was expected behavior. There is a > >> conflict (I think

Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion

2009-08-27 Thread Skip Ford
Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:59:19 -0700 > > From: Doug Barton > > Sender: owner-freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org > > > > Skip Ford wrote: > > > > > > Well, it wasn't immediately obvious to me that someone would ever want to > > > mark a port ignore and then want to upgrade it. S