[PATCH] Portsnap - set a good umask, for ports consistancy

Hi, I have a case where some users have different umasks (0077 in some cases). When these users call portsnap (via sudo), it leaves the port- directories permissions in an inconsistent state, and people need to use sudo to list files. I'm not sure honoring "umask" is good from a users-perspe

Re: fix ntptrace man page

On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 04:58 +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: > Hi all! > > It's a small fix to ntpdate man page for freebsd 7-stable. I was looking at this a few days ago. The problem is not that the man page is wrong, it's that the man page documents an entirely different tool. For some reason, Fre

Re: [PATCH] Portsnap - set a good umask, for ports consistancy

Sorry, seems the patch was not included. when I forwarded mail. I've attached it to this mail. Cheers! portsnap.umask.patch Description: Binary data On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Daniel Bond wrote: Hi, I have a case where some users have different umasks (0077 in some cases). When

Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion

On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > hail, > > > > portmaster is great, but this is keeping me from using it.I want to fire a > > portmaster -af and let it there until its done. for every package it asks > > this. is ther any way to make it not ask ? d

Re: named stop not stopping

Guy Helmer wrote: Lisa Besko wrote: We had an issue with the /etc/rc.d/named script this morning where it looped/hung in the wait_for_pids subroutine. We run a job to restart named which calls the /etc/rc.d/named script with a stop command. For some reason named did not stop properly and th

Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion

Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > that's just what I was looking for. after the library bumps that happened > after BETA2, I'd like to rebuild all :) There is an extensive writeup in the EXAMPLES section of the man page on how to rebuild all of your ports. I don't actually recommend that people use '-af' f

Re: fix ntpd man page

please drop the 20090825051910-ntpd_man_fix.diff patch, and use this: 20090825161558-ntpd_man_debug_fix.diff (attached) this attached patch fixed the documented man options, and runs correct: --8<-- # ntpd - ntpd 4.2.4p5-a Tue Aug 25 16:18:59 CEST 2009 (1) adding new filegen adding new f

Re: named stop not stopping

Doug Barton wrote: Lisa Besko wrote: We had an issue with the /etc/rc.d/named script this morning where it looped/hung in the wait_for_pids subroutine. We run a job to restart named which calls the /etc/rc.d/named script with a stop command. For some reason named did not stop properly and th

Re: fix ntptrace man page

funny, in /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/scripts/ntptrace implemented only the -n switch On 8/25/09, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 04:58 +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> It's a small fix to ntpdate man page for freebsd 7-stable. > > I was looking at this a few days ago. The p

Re: fix ntptrace man page

On 8/25/09, Oliver Pinter wrote: > funny, in /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/scripts/ntptrace implemented only the -n > switch > > > On 8/25/09, Gavin Atkinson wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 04:58 +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> It's a small fix to ntpdate man page for freebsd 7-stable. >>

Re: RESOLVED: Fatal trap 30 w/ latest 8.0-BETA2/amd64

on 23/08/2009 22:50 Jason Harmening said the following: > So after blindly posting to the list, I took some time to figure out > what FreeBSD uses trap code 30 for--turns out some misbehaving PCIe > hardware was firing an MSI to an unassigned vector. Switching it to > legacy interrupts fixed the p

Re: fix ntptrace man page

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 04:44:32PM +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 8/25/09, Oliver Pinter wrote: > > funny, in /usr/src/usr.sbin/ntp/scripts/ntptrace implemented only the -n > > switch > > > > > > On 8/25/09, Gavin Atkinson wrote: > >> On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 04:58 +0200, Oliver Pinter wrote: > >>

Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion

Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700 > Doug Barton wrote: > > > It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether > > or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest > > way to deal with that is to use '-aD' and then when it's done use

RELENG_6 build failures

Hi, I was trying to run a make universe on RELENG_6 and found: 1) alpha doesn't build 2) powerpc LINT fails with: config: Error: device "zs" is unknown 3) sparc64 LINT fails with: mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contr

Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion

Skip Ford wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700 >> Doug Barton wrote: >> >>> It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether >>> or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest >>> way to deal with that is to use '-aD' and th

Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion

Doug Barton wrote: > Skip Ford wrote: > > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:54:54 -0700 > >> Doug Barton wrote: > >> > >>> It sounds to me like what you're seeing is portmaster asking whether > >>> or not you want to delete the distfiles after an upgrade. The easiest > >>> way to de

Re: portmaster not ask for port deletion

On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:28:48 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > > that's just what I was looking for. after the library bumps that happened > > after BETA2, I'd like to rebuild all :) > > There is an extensive writeup in the EXAMPLES section of the man page > on how to rebuild