On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
> > How many of those 800 ports are actually necessary and used?
> > It would be better to get generate a complete list of your
> > installed ports, use pkg_deinstall or pkg_delete to remove
> > all ports, and then selectively re-install ports that are
> > a
On Thursday 23 July 2009 22:55:07 Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > How many of those 800 ports are actually necessary and used?
> > > It would be better to get generate a complete list of your
> > > installed ports, use pkg_deinstall or pkg_delete to remove
>
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 19:57 +0100, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> 6 months on, ataraid(4) did it again.
Which ataraid(4) controller is this? Seeing a verbose dmesg would help.
There are several patches in the PR database for ataraid problems, it
would be worth having a look.
Gavin
_
Hi.
I got a panic while performing a repetitive 'fdisk -BI aacd0',
where aacd0 is a disk on aac0: .
This means that the command was issued after filesystems
were already created on aacd (after the first fdisk -BI aacd0
iteration), and are in umount'ed state.
This is on 7.2-R, amd64. Config is a
2009/7/24 pluknet :
> Hi.
>
> I got a panic while performing a repetitive 'fdisk -BI aacd0',
> where aacd0 is a disk on aac0: .
> This means that the command was issued after filesystems
> were already created on aacd (after the first fdisk -BI aacd0
> iteration), and are in umount'ed state.
>
> T
I've recently begun running a torrent client after hours on a PC sitting
behind our firewall (7.2-STABLE using pf). I have added a 'rdr' rule to
redirect incoming traffic to the client PC from the firewall, and as far
as the client is concerned everything is fine.
However, after a short perio
If only a reboot solves the problem sounds like a kernel problem?
mbuf leakage?
On 2009-07-24 04:56:11PM -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> I've recently begun running a torrent client after hours on a PC sitting
> behind our firewall (7.2-STABLE using pf). I have added a 'rdr' rule to
> redirect i
TB --- 2009-07-24 21:39:39 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2009-07-24 21:39:39 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2009-07-24 21:39:39 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2009-07-24 21:40:06 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2009-07-24 21:40:06 - /usr/
Does anyone know what is the status of flash9 or flash10 in RELENG_7 ?
Following the thread of a couple of months ago, i tried to:
- remove all linux-* ports
- set the following in /etc/make.conf
OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8
OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f8
- set the following in /etc
Is there a main() function in your program?
Are you building this for LE operation, or with the Systems/C runtime?
If it's Systems/C, are you using the RENT library (and the -frent
option on the compilation?) If you want to build a non-RENT program
for USS, you can, but you have to set the appro
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:56:11PM -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
> I've recently begun running a torrent client after hours on a PC sitting
> behind our firewall (7.2-STABLE using pf). I have added a 'rdr' rule to
> redirect incoming traffic to the client PC from the firewall, and as far
> as th
11 matches
Mail list logo
