I'm playing around with the 3ware 9690SA raid controller. At first, I
was using FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2, but it kept encountering errors after
start-up and on shutdown. There is no 8.x driver on the 3ware site, so
I decided to go back to 7.2-RELEASE. This, however, did not solve the
problem. The major on
First I want to apologize. This should have happened a bit sooner in
our release cycle than now. To be honest I had slipped into "We have
symbol versioning for our libraries now" mode. But only a few of the
libraries currently have that turned on and I sorta forgot we still need
to deal with al
On Sun, 2009-07-19 at 20:26 +0200, Thomas Backman wrote:
> On Jul 19, 2009, at 20:16, Ken Smith wrote:
> > The problem is that as of the next time you update a machine that had
> > been running -current you are best off reinstalling all ports or other
> > applications you have on the machine. When
On Jul 19, 2009, at 20:16, Ken Smith wrote:
The problem is that as of the next time you update a machine that had
been running -current you are best off reinstalling all ports or other
applications you have on the machine. When you reboot after doing the
update to the base system everything you
Hi!
Simple test case:
8<--
#!/bin/sh
foo()
{
echo "\$?=$? \$1=$1"
}
false
foo $?
8<--
% sh foo.sh
$?=0 $1=1
% zsh foo.sh
$?=1 $1=1
% bash foo.sh
$?=1 $1=1
As you can see, the value of $? is « lost » when FreeBSD sh enters a
function. Is this su
2009/7/19 Romain Tartière :
> Hi!
>
> Simple test case:
>
> 8<--
> #!/bin/sh
> foo()
> {
> echo "\$?=$? \$1=$1"
> }
> false
> foo $?
> 8<--
>
> % sh foo.sh
> $?=0 $1=1
> % zsh foo.sh
> $?=1 $1=1
> % bash foo.sh
> $?=1 $1=1
>
> As you can see, the val
Hi Glen,
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> > % sh foo.sh
> > % zsh foo.sh
> > % bash foo.sh
> What happens if you replace '#!/bin/sh' with '#!/usr/local/bin/zsh' ?
This is not related to my problem since I am not running the script
using ./foo.sh but directly using th
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:26:38PM +0200, Romain Tartière wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Simple test case:
>
> 8<--
> #!/bin/sh
> foo()
> {
> echo "\$?=$? \$1=$1"
> }
> false
> foo $?
> 8<--
>
> % sh foo.sh
> $?=0 $1=1
> % zsh foo.sh
> $?=1 $1=1
> % bash foo.s
2009/7/19 Romain Tartière :
> Hi Glen,
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
>> > % sh foo.sh
>> > % zsh foo.sh
>> > % bash foo.sh
>> What happens if you replace '#!/bin/sh' with '#!/usr/local/bin/zsh' ?
>
> This is not related to my problem since I am not running the scr
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:47:55PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> This has been fixed in 8.x:
Cool, thanks!
--
Romain Tartière http://romain.blogreen.org/
pgp: 8DAB A124 0DA4 7024 F82A E748 D8E9 A33F FF56 FF43 (ID: 0xFF56FF43)
(plain text =non-HTML= PGP/GPG encrypted/signed e-mail much
Hi!
So I wanted to use an usb key on this freshly updated 7-stable box,
and got a panic just after plugging it in: :(
zsh triton# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel.symbols /var/crash/vmcore.9
...
umass0: on uhub5
umass0:1:0:-1: Attached to scbus1
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid =
do you plan to MFC this fix?
On 7/19/09, Romain Tartière wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:47:55PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
>> This has been fixed in 8.x:
> Cool, thanks!
>
> --
> Romain Tartière http://romain.blogreen.org/
> pgp: 8DAB A124 0DA4 7024 F82A E748 D8E9 A33F FF56 FF43
Ken Smith writes:
> First I want to apologize. This should have happened a bit sooner in
> our release cycle than now. To be honest I had slipped into "We have
> symbol versioning for our libraries now" mode. But only a few of the
> libraries currently have that turned on and I sorta forgot we
Possibly off-topic...
2009/7/19 Glen Barber :
> 2009/7/19 Romain Tartière :
>> Hi Glen,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
>>> > % sh foo.sh
>>> > % zsh foo.sh
>>> > % bash foo.sh
>>> What happens if you replace '#!/bin/sh' with '#!/usr/local/bin/zsh' ?
>>
>> This
In message <4ad871310907191717g1ed90be7y92250f2addc38...@mail.gmail.com>, Glen
Barber writes:
> Possibly off-topic...
>
>
> 2009/7/19 Glen Barber :
> > 2009/7/19 Romain Tarti=E8re :
> >> Hi Glen,
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:32:28PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>> > % sh foo.sh
> >>> >
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <4ad871310907191717g1ed90be7y92250f2addc38...@mail.gmail.com>, Glen
> Barber writes:
>> Possibly off-topic...
>>
>>
>> 2009/7/19 Glen Barber :
>> > 2009/7/19 Romain Tarti=E8re :
>> >> Hi Glen,
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message <4ad871310907191717g1ed90be7y92250f2addc38...@mail.gmail.com>,
> Glen
> Barber writes:
> > Possibly off-topic...
[..]
> > > My understanding was this:
> > >
> > > If you specify 'sh foo.sh' at the shell, the script will be run in a
> >
17 matches
Mail list logo
