Re: PXE boot FreeBSD without need of NFS server

Pertti, András, Thank You for the useful links! Kiitos and Köszönöm szépen :-) Gót András wrote: > Hi, > > AFAIK only the kernel and initrd (in the linux case) can be booted from > tftp, that's a PXE feature. When the kernel loaded it takes over and from > then on the kernel will need a rootfs f

Re: loader not working with GPT and LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT

MFC'd in 192969 On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Artis Caune wrote: > 2009/5/28 Lorenzo Perone : >> Hi, I'm a bit confused: >> >> I can't find this change (rev 185095) in the stable log, yet stable has some >> other >> recent changes related to the current posts (in turn commited also to >> head)

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Artem Belevich wrote: > I had the same problem on -current. Try attached patch. It may not > apply cleanly on -stable, but should be easy enough to make equivalent > changes on -stable. > > --Artem > Adding to rw_init looks fine, but I'd rather find out why owner

Re: NFS on ZFS

The flags checks are too strict. File a PR. I'll fix it when I get to it. Sorrry. -Kip On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Mike Andrews wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2009, Mike Andrews wrote: > >> Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote: >>> >>> Today's stable has a problem creating a new file via NFS on ZFS. >>> >>>

Re: loader not working with GPT and LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT

On 28 May 2009, at 9:40, Kip Macy wrote: MFC'd in 192969 Thanks for the explanation and all the hard work! Kind Regards, Ruben ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscr

Re: I've borked my ZFS system upgrading to -STABLE

On 27 May 2009, at 22:44, Kevin Day wrote: tries to do a chflags on it, fails because ZFS doesn't support flags are the pools already upgraded to v13 ? if not please do so with zpool upgrade -a Then in single user mode do zfs list -H | awk '{print $1}' | xargs -n 1 zfs set version=3 fl

[releng_7 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2009-05-28 11:27:23 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2009-05-28 11:27:23 - /usr/

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Artem Belevich wrote: I had the same problem on -current. Try attached patch. It may not apply cleanly on -stable, but should be easy enough to make equivalent changes on -stable. --Artem Adding to rw_init looks fine, but I'd rather find out

zdb core (same problem?)

Hi! > Adding to rw_init looks fine, but I'd rather find out why owner isn't > NULL when the calling convention expects it. Getting a backtrace from > where the assert is hit would be helpful. I have another zdb mypool crash on a 7.2-STABLE. f7# zpool history mypool History for 'mypool': 2009-0

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following: > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7 > #1 0x0008012a0feb in open () from /lib/libc.so.7 > #2 0x00080129ea59 in open () from /lib/libc.so.7 > #3 0x0008012a1f2e in vfprintf () from /lib/libc.so.7 >

[releng_7 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2009-05-28 12:33:50 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca TB --- 2009-05-28 12:33:50 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2009-05-28 12:33:50 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2009-05-28 12:34:13 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2009-05-28 12:34:13 - /usr/bi

Slow detection of Dell SAS 6i/R aka LSILogic SAS/SATA Adapter (mpt0)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm not sure if I should have sent this to freebsd-questions@, but here we go. I have a couple of Dell PowerEdge R200 rack servers, both equipped with the Dell SAS 6i/R RAID controller, running i386 7.2-RELEASE but they'll soon be upgraded to

ZFS booting without partitions (was: ZFS boot on zfs mirror)

Hi, I tried hard... but without success ;( the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel is not found. the console shows: forth not found definitions not found only not found (the above repeated several times) can't load 'k

Re: [releng_7 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

on 28/05/2009 16:56 FreeBSD Tinderbox said the following: > /src/sys/compat/linux/linux_mib.c: In function 'linux_kernver': > /src/sys/compat/linux/linux_mib.c:267: warning: 'osrel' may be used > uninitialized in this function > *** Error code 1 I agree :-) So what would osrel be if pr != NULL bu

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Andriy Gapon wrote: on 28/05/2009 16:26 Henri Hennebert said the following: (gdb) bt #0 0x0008012a6f22 in strlen () from /lib/libc.so.7 #1 0x0008012a0feb in open () from /lib/libc.so.7 #2 0x00080129ea59 in open () from /lib/libc.so.7 #3 0x0008012a1f2e in vfprintf () from /l

Re: ZFS MFC heads down

Henri Hennebert wrote: Kip Macy wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Kip Macy wrote: I will be MFC'ing the newer ZFS support some time this afternoon. Both world and kernel will need to be re-built. Existing pools will continue to work without upgrade. If you choose to upgrade a pool to t

Re: [releng_7 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:15:38AM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca > TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - starting RELENG_7 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 > TB --- 2009-05-28 11:26:51 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2009-05

Re: ZFS panic in zfs_fuid_create

on 27/05/2009 19:25 Lawrence Farr said the following: > I updated my backup boxes to the latest and greatest ZFS code, > and started getting the following panic on them all (3 machines): > > panic: zfs_fuid_create > cpuid = 1 > Uptime: 1h28m48s > Cannot dump. No dump device defined. > Automatic re

Re: I've borked my ZFS system upgrading to -STABLE

on 28/05/2009 11:47 Ruben van Staveren said the following: > > On 27 May 2009, at 22:44, Kevin Day wrote: > >> tries to do a chflags on it, fails because ZFS doesn't support flags > > > are the pools already upgraded to v13 ? if not please do so with zpool > upgrade -a > > Then in single user

Re: I've borked my ZFS system upgrading to -STABLE

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Ruben van Staveren wrote: > > On 27 May 2009, at 22:44, Kevin Day wrote: > >> tries to do a chflags on it, fails because ZFS doesn't support flags > > > are the pools already upgraded to v13 ? if not please do so with zpool > upgrade -a > > Then in single user mod

ZFS issue?

I updated my stable box (i386) on Tuesday and started seeing errors like the below intermittently. Is anyone else seeing anything like this? I saw similar errors periodically doing portupgrade and portinstall. Besides the intermittent errors the stability is much improved, my i386 box hasn't crash

Re: PXE boot FreeBSD without need of NFS server

On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:10:50AM +0200, Mikael Bak wrote: > Pertti, András, > Thank You for the useful links! > Kiitos and Köszönöm szépen :-) > > Gót András wrote: > > Hi, > > > > AFAIK only the kernel and initrd (in the linux case) can be booted from > > tftp, that's a PXE feature. When the k

Re: RFC: side effects of fixing loader_conf_files handling

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote: > That sounds good, thanks for working on this. Hi All, With this change it seems that if /boot/loader.conf is not present the loader stops altogether at |. Was that the desired effect of these changes? It is not a big deal for me to to

Re: ZFS booting without partitions (was: ZFS boot on zfs mirror)

hi, did you erase gmirror meta ? (on the last sector) with: gmirror clear ad6 2009/5/28 Lorenzo Perone : > Hi, > > I tried hard... but without success ;( > > the result is, when choosing the disk with the zfs boot > sectors in it (in my case F5, which goes to ad6), the kernel > is not found. the

Re: ZFS booting without partitions (was: ZFS boot on zfs mirror)

On 28.05.2009, at 21:46, Mickael MAILLOT wrote: hi, did you erase gmirror meta ? (on the last sector) with: gmirror clear ad6 ohps I had forgotten that. just did it (in single user mode), but it didn't help :( Shall I repeat any of the other steps after clearing gmirror meta? thanx a lot f

Re: I've borked my ZFS system upgrading to -STABLE

On 28 mei 2009, at 19:33, Niki Denev wrote: Just curious... doesn't a "zfs upgrade -a" do the same thing? The zpool upgrade is just for the pools, but the filesystems keep their original settings so we need to do that in a seperate move Regards, Niki Regards, Ruben

Re: I've borked my ZFS system upgrading to -STABLE

On Thu, 28 May 2009, Ruben van Staveren wrote: On 28 mei 2009, at 19:33, Niki Denev wrote: Just curious... doesn't a "zfs upgrade -a" do the same thing? The zpool upgrade is just for the pools, but the filesystems keep their original settings so we need to do that in a sepera

Re: A very big Thank You for the inclusion of ZFS

I'm in no way responsible for ZFS, but I wanted to let you know that emails like this are very very awesome to get. Thank you for the kind words, it does make FreeBSD development worthwhile when someone takes the time to send in kind words. -Alfred * Freddie Cash [090526 12:35] wrote: > I just

hi

http://abc777pills.pisem.su ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"