More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Don't know if this helps with anything, but it just hung after 2days again ... nothing on the console ... top process running at the time shows the following ... anything there look "concerning"? last pid: 5196; load averages: 9.25, 15.97, 10.07 up 2+07:58:36 04:02:28 1874 processes:317

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Don't know if this helps with anything, but it just hung after 2days > again ... nothing on the console ... top process running at the time > shows the following ... anything there look "concerning"? Looks like a dead/live

Re: File system corruption

2009-05-13 Thread Maciej Milewski
Tuesday 12 May 2009 20:10:57 Pat Wendorf napisał(a): > I have a co-lo server I've been maintaining for a few years now running IDE > drives on a mostly terrible UPS. A few months ago, when it returned from a > power outage (running 6.2-R) I started noticing the following in my daily > security ema

Re: "maxproc limit exceeded" making no sense

2009-05-13 Thread David Malone
> This user is classess, therefore its on default class on login.conf, > and all limits there are "unlimited". Might be worth checking that the limits are being set correctly by suing to the user (su -l if they have a real shell, to be certain). Could you be hitting the kern.maxprocperuid sysctl?

maximum mmap()

2009-05-13 Thread dikshie
Hi, i found that my rrdtool does not work with mmap() with rra files size more than 2GB. my question: on i386 arch, what's maximum size of file to be able to mmap() ? do i have to change from i386 to amd64? or added 4GB RAM? thanks! -- -dikx- ___ freeb

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
Marc, and folks, I have simillar "hang" problem on 6.4-STABLE and 7.2-STABLE servers, on which apache, squid, inn, named, isc-dhcpd and so on are running except DB servers. What kind of informations should I check to solve this annoying problem? I'm running munin-node on these machines, too. Th

Re: File system corruption

2009-05-13 Thread Ivan Voras
Maciej Milewski wrote: > Tuesday 12 May 2009 20:10:57 Pat Wendorf napisał(a): >> I have a co-lo server I've been maintaining for a few years now running IDE >> drives on a mostly terrible UPS. A few months ago, when it returned from a >> power outage (running 6.2-R) I started noticing the followin

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 3:09:33 am Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Don't know if this helps with anything, but it just hung after 2days again > ... nothing on the console ... top process running at the time shows the > following ... anything there look "concerning"? Is this a 2 CPU system? If so,

Re: maximum mmap()

2009-05-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 7:10:29 am dikshie wrote: > Hi, > i found that my rrdtool does not work with mmap() with rra files size > more than 2GB. > my question: on i386 arch, what's maximum size of file to be able to mmap() ? > do i have to change from i386 to amd64? or added 4GB RAM? The amount

Re: lock up in 6.2 (procs massively stuck in Giant)

2009-05-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 2:40:33 am pluknet wrote: > 2009/5/13 pluknet : > > 2009/5/13 John Baldwin : > >> On Tuesday 12 May 2009 4:59:19 pm pluknet wrote: > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> From just another box (not from the first two mentioned earlier) > >>> with a similar locking issue. If it would make sen

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 13 May 2009, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 13 May 2009 3:09:33 am Marc G. Fournier wrote: Don't know if this helps with anything, but it just hung after 2days again ... nothing on the console ... top process running at the time shows the following ... anything there look "concerning

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 10:50 AM 5/13/2009, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2009, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 13 May 2009 3:09:33 am Marc G. Fournier wrote: Don't know if this helps with anything, but it just hung after 2days again ... nothing on the console ... top process running at the time shows t

Re: lock up in 6.2 (procs massively stuck in Giant)

2009-05-13 Thread pluknet
2009/5/13 John Baldwin : > On Wednesday 13 May 2009 2:40:33 am pluknet wrote: >> 2009/5/13 pluknet : >> > 2009/5/13 John Baldwin : >> >> On Tuesday 12 May 2009 4:59:19 pm pluknet wrote: >> >>> Hi. >> >>> >> >>> From just another box (not from the first two mentioned earlier) >> >>> with a similar l

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Mike Tancsa wrote: What does your kernel config look like ? Included below ... only thought I had, taht I haven't tried yet, was changing from SCHED_4BSD -> SCHED_ULE ... machine amd64 cpu HAMMER ident kernel options SMP option

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 13 May 2009, John Baldwin wrote: On Wednesday 13 May 2009 3:09:33 am Marc G. Fournier wrote: Don't know if this helps with anything, but it just hung after 2days again ... nothing on the console ... top process running at the time shows the following ... anything there look "concerning

Re: em0 watchdog timeout 7-stable

2009-05-13 Thread Greg Byshenk
As a followup to my own previous message, I continue to have annoying problems with "em?: watchdog timeout" on one of my machines (now running 7.2-STABLE as of 2009-05-08). I have discontinued using the on-board (em, copper) NICs, and replaced the original fibre NIC with a newer model, but the pr

Re: em0 watchdog timeout 7-stable

2009-05-13 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 06:42:07PM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote: > As a followup to my own previous message, I continue to have annoying > problems with "em?: watchdog timeout" on one of my machines (now running > 7.2-STABLE as of 2009-05-08). > > I have discontinued using the on-board (em, copper)

Re: lock up in 6.2 (procs massively stuck in Giant)

2009-05-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 11:41:22 am pluknet wrote: > 2009/5/13 John Baldwin : > > On Wednesday 13 May 2009 2:40:33 am pluknet wrote: > >> 2009/5/13 pluknet : > >> > 2009/5/13 John Baldwin : > >> >> On Tuesday 12 May 2009 4:59:19 pm pluknet wrote: > >> >>> Hi. > >> >>> > >> >>> From just another bo

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 12:34:39 pm Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2009, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Wednesday 13 May 2009 3:09:33 am Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> > >> Don't know if this helps with anything, but it just hung after 2days again > >> ... nothing on the console ... top pr

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 12:31 PM 5/13/2009, Marc G. Fournier wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2009, Mike Tancsa wrote: What does your kernel config look like ? Included below ... only thought I had, taht I haven't tried yet, was changing from SCHED_4BSD -> SCHED_ULE ... ULE for sure. Are you sure some of the options be

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Chuck Swiger
Hi-- On May 13, 2009, at 9:52 AM, John Baldwin wrote: [ ... ] Well, you had a whole lot of page faults and other VM activity, plus 500k syscalls. The 'w' is a count of swapped processes, so basically your box is swapping a whole lot it seems. I think your box is just overloaded. Yep. Th

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 13 May 2009, John Baldwin wrote: Well, you had a whole lot of page faults and other VM activity, plus 500k syscalls. The 'w' is a count of swapped processes, so basically your box is swapping a whole lot it seems. I think your box is just overloaded. I knew I was going to regret post

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Marc G. Fournier" Right now, IO is running ~775 processes ... at the time of the vmstat I provided earlier, it was up to 1400 processes ... since there is only 5 minutes between script runs, something is causing it to go from zero swap -> high swap within

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Steven Hartland wrote: We've seen things similar to this when an process uncommon process does a query which locks the a table for a large amount of time on mysql. So many reasons why I hate MySQL :( One thing that we are trying right now is actually along these lines

Re: maximum mmap()

2009-05-13 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 16:11:44 John Baldwin wrote: > On Wednesday 13 May 2009 7:10:29 am dikshie wrote: >> i found that my rrdtool does not work with mmap() with rra files >> size more than 2GB. >> my question: on i386 arch, what's maximum size of file to be able >> to mmap() ? do i have to cha

Re: File system corruption

2009-05-13 Thread Pat Wendorf
I spoke too soon I guess: A buddy of mine at the hosting provider took down the box and did a fsck -y on the var partition, this seems to have cleaned it up. It looks like the regular fsck -p could not repair it. 2009/5/13 Maciej Milewski > Tuesday 12 May 2009 20:10:57 Pat Wendorf napisał(a): >

Re: File system corruption

2009-05-13 Thread Andrew Snow
Pat Wendorf wrote: I spoke too soon I guess: A buddy of mine at the hosting provider took down the box and did a fsck -y on the var partition, this seems to have cleaned it up. It looks like the regular fsck -p could not repair it. You may like to put fsck_y_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf,

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Marc G. Fournier" We'll see hwo the next 'test period' works out, with that MySQL stuff offline ... the other thing I've been working on is moving jails off of that server, one at a time, to see if I can narrow down which one is causing the spike ... I will

Re: More data on 7.2-RELEASE "hangs"

2009-05-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 13 May 2009 1:44:55 pm Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 13 May 2009, John Baldwin wrote: > > > Well, you had a whole lot of page faults and other VM activity, plus 500k > > syscalls. The 'w' is a count of swapped processes, so basically your box is > > swapping a whole lot it seems.

Re: maximum mmap()

2009-05-13 Thread dikshie
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:11 PM, John Baldwin wrote: > The amount of RAM is not the issue, it is the size of the virtual address > space.  You can lower maxdsiz on i386 to leave more room for mmap, and you > can also change KVA_PAGES in the kernel to leave more address space for > userland than

FAILURE - zero length DMA transfer attempted

2009-05-13 Thread Martin
Hi, yesterday I was using my DVD drive (simply reading a DVD). I got lots of syslog entries that look like this: ata4: FAILURE - zero length DMA transfer attempted acd0: setting up DMA failed This happens on: FreeBSD kirby 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Wed May 6 09:40:10 CEST 2009 r

Voce recebeu um VIVO Torpedo.

2009-05-13 Thread VIVO Torpedo
Você está recebendo um email Torpedo Multimídia O vivo torpedo foi enviado de um celular com uma foto para seu email, do número 9298. [1]Inicializar download do arquivo (337kb) Vivo agora do seu celular para seu