On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:42:29PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:53:34PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:05:32PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:11:43PM +0300, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:03:25AM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:42:29PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:53:34PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:05:32PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:
On 2009-03-30 23:23, Bruce Cran wrote:
> I've noticed that if I fill the input buffer at the loader prompt on
> 7-STABLE I get panic with a guard page failure. From what I can see
> the loader uses the ngets function in src/lib/libstand/gets.c with a
> buffer of size of 256. If I print out the va
Hi there colleagues,
atapci3: port
0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb807,0xb480-0xb483,0xb400-0xb40f mem
0xefcb3000-0xefcb3fff irq 23 at device 5.2 on pci0
atacontrol detach ata7
- insert ATA disk (ad14)
atacontrol attach ata7
pinics with Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> Nathanael Jean-Francois wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I've been getting some panics with a 7.1 stable machine from March 14th.
>> I've not been able to determine the cause nor reproduce them at will.
>> Here's a backtrace from the latest panic on March 23rd. Let me know if
>> any
>> more informatio
Andrei Kolu wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> 2009/3/25 Barry Pederson :
>>
>>
>>> Is there any reason not to skip labeling/partitioning and use da1
>>> directly?
>>> Just newfs it and mount it. I've done this with a couple large Areca
>>> arrays with no ill effect so far.
>>>
>>
>> Nope, no p
On Monday 30 March 2009 5:23:07 pm Bruce Cran wrote:
> I've noticed that if I fill the input buffer at the loader prompt on
> 7-STABLE I get panic with a guard page failure. From what I can see
> the loader uses the ngets function in src/lib/libstand/gets.c with a
> buffer of size of 256. If I pr
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:36:08PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:03:25AM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:42:29PM +0900, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 08:53:34PM +0400, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:
Hi there.
[I don't know if it was discussed already.]
tcpdump'ed from RELENG_7, kernel and modules as of Mar 22 are in sync,
world as of Mar 18.
I caught this while building kernel via NFS. The subj host is an NFS server.
23:22:03.056098 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 26932, offset 0, flags [DF], prot
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 03:06:42PM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> That's all. If you have any issues/question feel free to ask. Have a nice day!
Thank you again on-list, Alexander, for your comprehensive instructions
which would have worked immediately if I had read
/usr/ports/UPDATING befor
In the last episode (Apr 01), pluknet said:
> tcpdump'ed from RELENG_7, kernel and modules as of Mar 22 are in sync,
> world as of Mar 18.
>
> I caught this while building kernel via NFS. The subj host is an NFS server.
>
> 23:22:03.056098 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 26932, offset 0, flags [DF], prot
Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
Hi there colleagues,
atapci3: port
0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb807,0xb480-0xb483,0xb400-0xb40f mem
0xefcb3000-0xefcb3fff irq 23 at device 5.2 on pci0
atacontrol detach ata7
- insert ATA disk (ad14)
atacontrol attach ata7
pinics with Fatal trap 12: page f
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Alexander Motin wrote:
AM> Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
AM> > Hi there colleagues,
AM> >
AM> > atapci3: port
AM> > 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb807,0xb480-0xb483,0xb400-0xb40f mem
AM> > 0xefcb3000-0xefcb3fff irq 23 at device 5.2 on pci0
AM> >
AM> >
AM> > atacontrol det
On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM> AM> > atapci3: port
DM> AM> > 0xbc00-0xbc07,0xb880-0xb883,0xb800-0xb807,0xb480-0xb483,0xb400-0xb40f
mem
DM> AM> > 0xefcb3000-0xefcb3fff irq 23 at device 5.2 on pci0
DM> AM> >
DM> AM> >
DM> AM> > atacontrol detach ata7
DM> AM> > - insert ATA disk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(It would be probably good idea to redirect this discussion to -stable@,
redirected)
Hi, Danny,
Danny Braniss wrote:
> It's no longer working (for me) under 7.2, and so far
> I am not getting any feedback, so since it seems that
> this particular har
Ivan Voras wrote:
Andrei Kolu wrote:
Ivan Voras wrote:
2009/3/25 Barry Pederson :
Is there any reason not to skip labeling/partitioning and use da1
directly?
Just newfs it and mount it. I've done this with a couple large Areca
arrays with no ill effect so far.
2009/4/1 Dan Nelson :
> In the last episode (Apr 01), pluknet said:
>> tcpdump'ed from RELENG_7, kernel and modules as of Mar 22 are in sync,
>> world as of Mar 18.
>>
>> I caught this while building kernel via NFS. The subj host is an NFS server.
>>
>> 23:22:03.056098 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 26932
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Andrei Kolu wrote:
> I forgot to try ZFS on that particular server- maybe that one would be
> better alternative? I have experience with ZFS on terabyte sized volumes and
> had no ill effects so far- what about really large filesystems? I know that
> ZFS is consid
18 matches
Mail list logo
