On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 08:58:12AM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:46:55 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
> about Re: fun with if_re:
>
>
> PY> Since you're using RTL8169SC it could be related with my commit
> PY> r180519(cvs rev 1.95.2.22). It seems that RTL8169SC does not like
> PY
Hi,
I am using Ruby 1.8.6 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 287) on FreeBSD 7.0-
RELEASE-p7. I have some code that -among other things- parses XML
files and when it does in at least one case, it dumps core with the
following error msg:
-x-x-x-
/usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/rexml/parent.rb:19: [BUG] object
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 18:42 +0100, Tomas Randa wrote:
> Yes, I do portupgrade -Rrfia after upgrade of course.
> I don`t think it is some "new" PHP bug, because my friend have same
> problem with memory and he do not upgraded ports. But his box do not
> free memory after apache reload, my yes
>
>
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:28:04 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote
about Re: fun with if_re:
PY> > I did build new nanobsd images with these patches meanwhile and will
PY> > start using them today. However, as it has worked without problems
PY> > for weeks with the buggy version before, I will not be able to
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:05:46 +0100 Gerrit Kühn
wrote about Re: fun with if_re:
GK> Sorry to be back so soon again, but I just noticed that I did in fact
GK> not produce new images yesterday. :-)
GK> Kernel build stopped with
[...]
Ignore me, my bad (downloaded the webpage instead of the code via
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Compile ddb into the kernel, and do "ps" from the ddb prompt. If there
> are processes hung in the "nbufkv" state, then the patch below might
> help.
The bonnie++ processes are in state "newbuf" and other hung processes
(bash, newly forked sshds, etc) appear to be in the "
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 11:26:58AM +, Matt Burke wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > Compile ddb into the kernel, and do "ps" from the ddb prompt. If there
> > are processes hung in the "nbufkv" state, then the patch below might
> > help.
>
> The bonnie++ processes are in state "newbuf" and ot
Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> Compile ddb into the kernel, and do "ps" from the ddb prompt. If there
>>> are processes hung in the "nbufkv" state, then the patch below might
>>> help.
>> The bonnie++ processes are in state "newbuf" and other hung processes
>> (bash, newly forked sshds, etc) appear to
I have an NFS server and NFS client separated by a firewall. Both
servers are FreeBSD 7.1.
Server configuration:
nfs_server_enable="YES"
nfs_server_flags="-t -n 4"
rpcbind_enable="YES"
mountd_flags="-r -p 737"
mountd_enable="YES"
The firewall allows tcp and udp to port 111, but only tcp to ports
Hi John Birrell,
I am exploring DTrace on "7.1-STABLE FreeBSD amd64" and I found several
weird behaviors:
1) Not all kernel functions show up in fbt provider. Take isp(4) as example:
"dtrace -l" shows
static void isp_freeze_loopdown(ispsoftc_t *, int, char *);
___but not___
stati
Hello,
I've created a new patch for all the pmc feature available on trunk
(02/05).
It has been tested on a core2duo in amd64 and i386 mode with success.
Feel free to test and give your feedback.
Thanks to Joseph Koshy for the hard work on pmc.
Patch is linked on the PmcTools wiki page: http
As I don't own that server anymore, I'm afraid I can't tell you whether
it's working now. :(
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:31:47AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 06:37:53PM +0100, Henrik Friedrichsen wrote:
> > Hey.
> >
> > I have had similar symptoms on a dedicated server wi
Forwarding to list because mail to ema...@freebsd.org bounced at the
location it is apparently being forwarded to so I'm not sure if it
was received. I'll add that the problem seems to follow a pattern where
it happens only twice after a reboot (usually in the morning when rsync runs)
and then it
Chris H presented these words - circa 1/30/09 4:54 PM->
Hello Patrick, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Patrick Mahan :
Chris H presented these words - circa 1/30/09 7:03 AM->
Hello Bruce, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting "Bruce M. Simpson" :
Chris H wrote:
...
I know Pete
Hi,
on 2 different servers, running 7.1-stable + zfs, I get this
error rather frequently:
Feb 5 17:01:03 warhol-00 kernel: impossible packet length (543383918) from
nfs server sunfire:/dist
Feb 5 17:01:03 warhol-00 kernel: impossible packet length (1936028704) from
nfs server sunfire:/dist
Feb
On 2009-Feb-06 08:32:27 +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
>on 2 different servers, running 7.1-stable + zfs, I get this
>error rather frequently:
>
>Feb 5 17:01:03 warhol-00 kernel: impossible packet length (543383918) from
>nfs server sunfire:/dist
I gather warhol-00 is running 7.1-S+ZFS.
How recent
> On 2009-Feb-06 08:32:27 +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
> >on 2 different servers, running 7.1-stable + zfs, I get this
> >error rather frequently:
> >
> >Feb 5 17:01:03 warhol-00 kernel: impossible packet length (543383918) fro=
> m=20
> >nfs server sunfire:/dist
>
So many quetsions :-)
> I gat
17 matches
Mail list logo
