Re: Lock enabling onboard lan (Attansic L1 GbE) on 7.1-PRERELEASE

2009-01-10 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:07:24AM +0100, Barbara wrote: [...] > >Would try the following WIP version? > >http://people. > freebsd.org/~yongari/age/if_age.c > >http://people.freebsd. > org/~yongari/age/if_agereg.h > >I have no longer access to L1 hardware so I don't > know whether it > >

Re: more marvell marvels

2009-01-10 Thread Danny Braniss
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 01:48:24PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: > > hi, the mb is asus P5K-VM, the onboard nic is, acccording to pciconf: > > > > ms...@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x81f81043 chip=0x436411ab > > rev=0x12 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Marvell Semiconductor (Was: Ga

Re: 2 (very old) bugs?

2009-01-10 Thread Jaakko Heinonen
Hi, On 2009-01-09, Doug Barton wrote: > Yannick Cadin wrote: > > - first in the stat command. Only with the -x option. If you execute > > stat -x on /tmp or /usr/bin/passwd parameters for example, the numeric > > representation of mode is wrong. The "special" bits are always 0. No > > suid-bit, n

Re: pciconf: incorrect description for Marvell 88SX6101 chip

2009-01-10 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 21/11/2008 15:14 Andriy Gapon said the following: > I wasn't sure where this belongs, so writing here. > This is stable/7 on Intel DG33TL: > > $ pciconf -lv > ... > atap...@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x01018f card=0x610111ab chip=0x610111ab > rev=0xb2 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Marvell Semiconduct

rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?)

2009-01-10 Thread Andriy Gapon
$ /etc/rc.d/mountd onestart /etc/rc.d/mountd: WARNING: /etc/exports is not readable. Exit 1 Actually /etc/exports did not exist at all. And this was not a "WARNING", this was a fatal error, mountd did not start. Alsp, should it actually fail like this? I have ZFS and I plan to do all NFS export

[HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-01-10 Thread Robert Noland
I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. - Support for latest Intel chips - Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below - Support AMD/ATI IGP based chips (rs690/rs485) - Lots of code cleanups - Lots of other fixes and changes since the exi

Re: rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?)

2009-01-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > $ /etc/rc.d/mountd onestart > /etc/rc.d/mountd: WARNING: /etc/exports is not readable. > Exit 1 > > Actually /etc/exports did not exist at all. > And this was not a "WARNING", this was a fatal error, mountd did not start. > > Alsp, should it

Re: rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?)

2009-01-10 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 10/01/2009 17:11 Garrett Cooper said the following: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> $ /etc/rc.d/mountd onestart >> /etc/rc.d/mountd: WARNING: /etc/exports is not readable. >> Exit 1 >> >> Actually /etc/exports did not exist at all. >> And this was not a "WARNING", this

Re: rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?)

2009-01-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 10/01/2009 17:11 Garrett Cooper said the following: >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> $ /etc/rc.d/mountd onestart >>> /etc/rc.d/mountd: WARNING: /etc/exports is not readable. >>> Exit 1 >>> >>> Actually /etc/expor

Re: rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?)

2009-01-10 Thread Pete French
> Alsp, should it actually fail like this? I have ZFS and I plan to do > all NFS exports from ZFS, so /etc/exports would never be used. ZFS writes its own exports file to '/etc/zfs/exports' - as far as I can tell this is pretty much all that happens when you mark a filesystem as NFS shared under

Re: rc.d/mountd: confusing message (and behavior?)

2009-01-10 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 10/01/2009 17:18 Garrett Cooper said the following: >>> >>> s/same functionality/same basic functionality/. >>> Mind you, NFS is a networking filesystem. ZFS is a filestore

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-10 Thread Pete French
> FWIW, the other guy I know who is having this problem had already > switched to using ULE under 7.0-release, and did not have any > problems with it. So *his* problem was probably not related to > SCHED_ULE, unless something has recently changed there. Well, one of my machines just locked up ag

Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-01-10 Thread Robert Noland
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 10:01 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. > > - Support for latest Intel chips > - Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below > - Support AMD/ATI IGP based chips (rs690/rs485) > - Lots of c

Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-01-10 Thread Roland Smith
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:49:01AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 10:01 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. > > > > - Support for latest Intel chips > > - Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below > >

Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-01-10 Thread Robert Noland
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 18:54 +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:49:01AM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 10:01 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > > I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. > > > > > > - Support for latest Intel chips > > >

Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-01-10 Thread vehemens
On Saturday 10 January 2009 08:49:01 am Robert Noland wrote: > On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 10:01 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. > > > > - Support for latest Intel chips > > - Support and fixes for many AMD/ATI chips r500 and below > >

7.1 manpages: "first appeared in FreeBSD 8.0"

2009-01-10 Thread Jan Henrik Sylvester
I found a 7.1-RELEASE manpage stating "first appeared in FreeBSD 8.0". A little bit of grepping revealed a few more: setfib(1) setfib(2) ffs(3) ffsl(3) ffsll(3) fls(3) flsl(3) flsll(3) memchr(3) memrchr(3) malo(4) crashinfo(8) savecore(8) Some others are correctly stating "7.1" for example te

"vr0: rx packet lost"

2009-01-10 Thread David Ehrmann
I'm using 7.0-RELEASE. When there's heavy network traffic through the vr0 interface, I see lots of "vr0: rx packet lost" messages, and occasional "vr0: watchdog timeout" messages. I googled and found some information, but it was on an earlier version of FreeBSD, and there weren't any solution

Re: [HEADS UP] drm merged to -STABLE

2009-01-10 Thread Robert Noland
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 15:53 -0800, vehemens wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2009 08:49:01 am Robert Noland wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 10:01 -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > > I just merged drm (Direct Rendering) from HEAD. > > > > > > - Support for latest Intel chips > > > - Su

Re: "vr0: rx packet lost"

2009-01-10 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 07:49 PM 1/10/2009, David Ehrmann wrote: I'm using 7.0-RELEASE. Ideas? Is there any additional information I should provide? 7.1R has a *far* better vr driver that has a lot of bug fixes in it. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/vr/if_vr.c has details of what was fixed.

Re: Big problems with 7.1 locking up :-(

2009-01-10 Thread heliocentric
I noticed a similar problem testing 7.1-RC1, It seemed to be a deep deadlock, as it was triggered by lighttpd doing kern_sendfile, and never returning. The side effects (being unable to create processes, etc) is similar. My kernconf is below, try building the kernel, and send an email containing t

Re: "vr0: rx packet lost"

2009-01-10 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 08:51:06PM -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 07:49 PM 1/10/2009, David Ehrmann wrote: > >I'm using 7.0-RELEASE. > >Ideas? Is there any additional information I should provide? > > 7.1R has a *far* better vr driver that has a lot of bug fixes in it. > > http://www.free

Re: "vr0: rx packet lost"

2009-01-10 Thread David Ehrmann
Wow. That really is a lot, but I might just wait for the final release, though with this command, it might not be such a big deal: freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.1-RC1 Mike Tancsa wrote: At 07:49 PM 1/10/2009, David Ehrmann wrote: I'm using 7.0-RELEASE. Ideas? Is there any additional informa

Re: "vr0: rx packet lost"

2009-01-10 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2009-Jan-10 19:15:22 -0800, David Ehrmann wrote: >Wow. That really is a lot, but I might just wait for the final release, >though with this command, it might not be such a big deal: > >freebsd-update upgrade -r 7.1-RC1 FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE has been available for nearly a week. -- Peter Jere