On 2008-Dec-29 20:28:41 -0500, Terry Kennedy wrote:
> I upgraded a box (Dell Poweredge 1550, dual PIII processors) from a kernel +
>world of December 8th to one from today (December 29th) and I am experiencing
>a new problem with rdump.
...
> A tcpdump on both the sending and receiving systems s
While debugging I noticed that sys/netgraph/ng_base.c#rev1.131
was MFCed to RELENG_6 inbeetwen 6.3 and 6.4 by mav as 1.102.2.15.
But this depends on sys/kern/subr_witness.c#rev1.227 which was
not MFCed, and that is triggering panic (in subj) if kernel is built
with WITNESS.
--
wbr,
pluknet
_
2008/12/30 Alexander Motin :
> pluknet wrote:
>> While debugging I noticed that sys/netgraph/ng_base.c#rev1.131
>> was MFCed to RELENG_6 inbeetwen 6.3 and 6.4 by mav as 1.102.2.15.
>>
>> But this depends on sys/kern/subr_witness.c#rev1.227 which was
>> not MFCed, and that is triggering panic (in su
pluknet wrote:
> While debugging I noticed that sys/netgraph/ng_base.c#rev1.131
> was MFCed to RELENG_6 inbeetwen 6.3 and 6.4 by mav as 1.102.2.15.
>
> But this depends on sys/kern/subr_witness.c#rev1.227 which was
> not MFCed, and that is triggering panic (in subj) if kernel is built
> with WITNE
> Unfortunately, you need the last packets that were exchanged in order
> to identify which end has the problem (and hopefully provide some
> pointers as to why). If possible, can you repeat the dump whilst you
> run a tcpdump on the rdump flow and then post the last dozen or so
> packets in each
On 2008-Dec-30 05:48:26 -0500, Terry Kennedy wrote:
>> Unfortunately, you need the last packets that were exchanged in order
>> to identify which end has the problem (and hopefully provide some
>> pointers as to why). If possible, can you repeat the dump whilst you
>> run a tcpdump on the rdump f
I'm pretty sure it's caused by FreeBSD. It can very well be related to
PR 117603, a real nasty dump(8) bug that was introduced in 7.0 on SMP
systems. But it should have been patched back in March by this:
jeff 2008-03-13 00:46:12 UTC
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/kern subr_sleepqu
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
...
Linux's libata driver has a quirk for VIA AHCI:
/* vt8251 doesn't clear BSY on signature FIS reception,
* request follow-up softreset.
*/
If i right understand it issues softreset for VIA controllers just
after hardreset. And after softreset it is trying to read d
Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
...
Linux's libata driver has a quirk for VIA AHCI:
/* vt8251 doesn't clear BSY on signature FIS reception,
* request follow-up softreset.
*/
If i right understand it issues softreset for VIA controllers just
after hardreset. And after softres
Dear listers,
We recently found our new FreeBSD server (located in some foreign
region) has poor network performance. After doing some tcpdump and
iperf testing, we found that out-of-order TCP packets are not inserted
into queue.
This is an 100Mbps line, and TSO is disabled.
% uname -a
FreeBSD b
Hello,
With 7.1-RC2 :
Dec 30 18:10:38 client1 kernel: FreeBSD 7.1-RC2 #0: Tue Dec 23 11:42:13
UTC 2008
Dec 30 18:10:38 client1 kernel:
r...@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
Dec 30 18:10:38 client1 kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz
quality 0
Dec 30 18:10:38
> I'm pretty sure it's caused by FreeBSD. It can very well be related to
> PR 117603, a real nasty dump(8) bug that was introduced in 7.0 on SMP
> systems. But it should have been patched back in March by this:
[...]
> So I'm real surprised it shows up again. We got a pretty large backup
> enviro
I had 7.0 installed and did a binary upgrade to 7.1RC2
everything seems okay until I went to check my mailq and got :
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I am running Postfix as my mail server and it does not seem to be
affected.
I can't even run sendmail as I get the same error.
---
Hello,
one of my motherboards has an onboard Attansic network interface, I
think an AR8121.
# pciconf -lcv
no...@pci0:4:0:0: class=0x02
card=0x82261043 chip=0x10481969 rev=0xb0 hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Attansic
(Now owned by Atheros)'
device = 'L1 Gigabit Ethernet 10/100/100
On Dec 30, 2008, at 20:16, Peter Sprokkelenburg
wrote:
I had 7.0 installed and did a binary upgrade to 7.1RC2
everything seems okay until I went to check my mailq and got :
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
I am running Postfix as my mail server and it does not seem to be
affected.
I ca
15 matches
Mail list logo