I use the controller LSI 1068E (mpt). When disk array (mirror) is
degrading i get kernel panic. With the recovery disk array, I also get a
kernel panic
FreeBSD qweqwe 7.1-BETA2 FreeBSD 7.1-BETA2 #0: Sun Oct 12 20:59:28 UTC
2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
Fatal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have
enabled SMART checking using the smartmontools as usual for the disk
(/dev/ad6 -a -S on -s (S/../.././03|L/../../7/03) -m root). The problem
is that each time the test runs I g
On Sun, 26 Oct 2008, Jose Amengual wrote:
Hi,
The problem persist even in stable 7.0, 7.1-PRERELEASE and 7.0-P5 , the
postfix jail is living all the email in defer queue saying "Connection Time
Out"
This server give service to 300 clients and the network load os high.
is there any clue how
Hi Bjoern.
I have PF has a firewall with 4 jails and nat.
I have the same configuration in a 6.4 with no issues.
I can send you my pf.conf if you want and any dump file, just let me know
with options do you need with tcpdump.
I didn't have any offload stuff enabled I just install freebsd defaul
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1) I wonder if I could use mergemaster to compare 2 directories and
> > > merge differencies as neccessary. To explain: I have all config files I
> > > touch saved with full path somewh
On Friday 24 October 2008 02:48:13 pm Jo Rhett wrote:
> So I booted up by CD and used Fixit mode to switch the system to boot
> via serial (keyboard detached), but this gathered me even less.
>
> /boot.config: -Dh
> Consoles: internal video/keyboard serial port
> BIOS drive A: is disk0
> BIOS d
On Friday 24 October 2008 03:05:32 pm Jo Rhett wrote:
> John, is this perhaps the problem seen with 7.0, discussed here?
>
http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/stable/2008-05/msg00437.html
It is related, but that fix is already in 6.4.
--
John Baldwin
__
On Saturday 25 October 2008 04:09:45 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Just for posterity: the USB Legacy Support BIOS option does not affect
> natively-connected PS/2 keyboards; you can leave the option enabled even
> in the scenario where you have a USB keyboard *and* a PS/2 keyboard
> plugged in; one
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hi,
> I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have
> enabled SMART checking using the smartmontools as usual for the disk
> (/dev/ad6 -a -S on -s (S/../.
Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> # ifconfig rl0 ether 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask
> 255.255.255.0
> ifconfig: can't set link-level netmask or broadcast
>
> # ifconfig rl0 inet 192.168.2.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 ether
> 00:02:4f:0a:ce:f3
> ifconfig: ether: bad value
>
> # ifconfig
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:57:05AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday 25 October 2008 04:09:45 am Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Just for posterity: the USB Legacy Support BIOS option does not affect
> > natively-connected PS/2 keyboards; you can leave the option enabled even
> > in the scenario
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hi,
>> I have recently bought a new disk (Seagate 500G, ST3500320NS). I have
>> enabled SMART checkin
On Tuesday 07 October 2008 17:10:49 Xin LI wrote:
> Did anyone who can trigger the data corruption has tried John's patch
> and let us know if it worked?
>
> Cheers,
I can confirm that it works on my PowerEdge SC1435. With both controllers
running in SATA150 mode, I have an uptime of 101 days w
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:22:03PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> > Second, your short offline test runs at 0300, but the errors you're
> > seeing are at 0454 in the morning. A short offline test does not
Oliver Fromme wrote:
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 1) I wonder if I could use mergemaster to compare 2 directories and
> > > merge differencies as neccessary. To explain: I have all config files I
> > > touch save
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
they're used for? :-) If so, you'd know that running them periodically
is more
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
> disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
>>
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:22:03PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:16:59AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Second, your short offline test runs at 0300, but the errors you're
seeing are at 0454 in the morning. A short offlin
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> I'd like a more general purpose utility, be it mergemaster or sth else.
> I like the way mergemaster works but I'd like to use it not only for
> /etc (after make) -- I'd like to point it to my backup directory which
> doesn't co
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything
besides
disabling the testing that I can do about it?
Do you understand what short and long offline tests act
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
>>> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
>>> disabling the testing that I can do abou
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:26:03 +0100
martinko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like a more general purpose utility, be it mergemaster or sth
> else. I like the way mergemaster works but I'd like to use it not
> only for /etc (after make) -- I'd like to point it to my backup
> directory which doesn't
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Now, does the timeout cause loss of any data? Is there anything besides
disabling the testing that I ca
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 10:53 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 06:22:03PM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > Do you understand what short and long offline tests actually do and what
> > > they're used for? :-) If so, you'd know that running them pe
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 21:45 +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
> >
> >>Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:52:01PM +0100, martinko wrote:
> >>>
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> >>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:30:26PM -0400, Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 21:45 +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> > Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 08:50:44PM +0100, martinko wrote:
> > >
> > >>Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>On Mon, Oct 27, 2
IMO, A much better option to run on a weekly basis is to use a RAID
controller with "verify" feature (eg. 3ware) or use ZFS "scrub" mode.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubsc
Hi Guys.
I will describe de steps that I did to solve this problem that I still
don't understand.
Like my first post, I installed FreeBSD with the install cd 7.0-
STABLE-200807-i386-disc1.iso , then I update using cvsup and the
stable supfile and I got the 7.1-PREREALEASE ( I don't know wh
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:47:12PM -0300, Jose Amengual wrote:
> Like my first post, I installed FreeBSD with the install cd 7.0-
> STABLE-200807-i386-disc1.iso , then I update using cvsup and the stable
> supfile and I got the 7.1-PREREALEASE ( I don't know why I got 7.1 has a
> stable using th
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 07:53:17PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:47:12PM -0300, Jose Amengual wrote:
> > Like my first post, I installed FreeBSD with the install cd 7.0-
> > STABLE-200807-i386-disc1.iso , then I update using cvsup and the stable
> > supfile and I got
Hello all,
I've been searching around and have come up with no current discussions on
this issue. I'll keep it brief:
In 7.0 or 7.1 is there any provision to have multiple IP addresses in a
jail?
I'm stumped on this, as I just started a new hosting project that needs a
few jails. At leas
32 matches
Mail list logo
