Re: Request for testing: ata(4) MFC

2008-10-17 Thread Ruben van Staveren
Hi, On 17 Oct 2008, at 1:15, Steven Hartland wrote: You must be very careful with using less than 48bit addressing when both the drive and the controller supports it as some disks report errors at none standard crossover points. I saw this first hand with the highpoint driver where it tota

Re: Request for testing: ata(4) MFC

2008-10-17 Thread Steven Hartland
Highly likely, as it was seagate disks I had this issue with. The comment in the hptmv driver:- + /* +* always use 48bit LBA if drive supports it. +* Some Seagate drives report error if you use a 28-bit command +* to access sector 0xfff. +*/ - Original Message - Fro

"mount -u -o ro" problems with 7-stable

2008-10-17 Thread Oliver Fromme
Hi, This happened to me repeatedly (but not always), even after updating to the latest RELENG_7 yesterday ... 1. Boot into single user mode 2. fsck /# finishes successful! 3. mount -u / 4. Do a few edits to files in /etc 5. mount -u -o ro / softdep_waitidle: Failed to flush worklist for 0xc1f

Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable

2008-10-17 Thread Tijl Coosemans
On Thursday 16 October 2008 22:23:27 J.R. Oldroyd wrote: > It works here, although my 7-stable is a few days old and I applied > the linprocfs.c patch by hand. > > I also used the pre-compiled libflashsupport.so binary referred to in > the thread. > > Then used nspluginwrapper to add links for na

Re: Recommendations for servers running SATA drives [hot-swap]

2008-10-17 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Today I was replacing disk in one Sun Fire X2100 M2 so I tried hot-swapping. It was as you said: atacontrol detach ata3, replace the HDD, atacontrol attach ata3 and new disk is in the system. I tried it

Re: rl0: watchdog timeout + 40, 000 ms ping with 7.1-BETA-i386-disc1.iso

2008-10-17 Thread Julian Stacey
Hi, Reference: > From: "Julian Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:32:04 +0200 > Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Julian Stacey" wrote: > Hi stable@ & I added re@ > Summary: > Seems I've found a regression error between 6.0-RELEASE & > 7.1-BETA-i386-disc1.

Re: "mount -u -o ro" problems with 7-stable

2008-10-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:50:39PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Hi, > > This happened to me repeatedly (but not always), even > after updating to the latest RELENG_7 yesterday ... > > 1. Boot into single user mode > 2. fsck /# finishes successful! > 3. mount -u / > 4. Do a few edits to files

Re: Recommendations for servers running SATA drives [hot-swap]

2008-10-17 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> >>> Today I was replacing disk in one Sun Fire X2100 M2 so I tried >>> hot-swapping. It was as you said: atacontrol detach ata3, repl

Correct downgrade procedure

2008-10-17 Thread Tom Evans
Hi all I've been having increasingly annoying Xorg crashes with 7.1, on a previously very reliable laptop[1], and am now trying to go back to how it used to work, starting off by downgrading kernel + world to 7.0-RELEASE, which used to work quite nicely. If that fails to make any huge strides, I g

Re: rl0: watchdog timeout + 40, 000 ms ping with 7.1-BETA-i386-disc1.iso

2008-10-17 Thread Julian Stacey
Hi stable & re, > > Hi stable@ & I added re@ > > Summary: > > Seems I've found a regression error between 6.0-RELEASE & > > 7.1-BETA-i386-disc1.iso. > > I just installed 6.4-RC1-i386-disc1.iso & that works OK with rl0 > Now installing 7.1-BETA2-i386-disc1.iso & will report after. The fault ( [rl

Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable

2008-10-17 Thread J.R. Oldroyd
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:37:56 +0200, Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No audio often means libflashsupport can't find all lib dependencies. I had noticed that a couple of dependencies were, in fact, missing. Your email was very timely - I was just going to figure out how to get them.

Re: Correct downgrade procedure

2008-10-17 Thread Willy Offermans
Hello Tom and FreeBSD friends, On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:03:48PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote: > Hi all > > I've been having increasingly annoying Xorg crashes with 7.1, on a > previously very reliable laptop[1], and am now trying to go back to how > it used to work, starting off by downgrading kernel

Re: "mount -u -o ro" problems with 7-stable

2008-10-17 Thread Oliver Fromme
Kostik Belousov wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This happened to me repeatedly (but not always), even > > after updating to the latest RELENG_7 yesterday ... > > > > 1. Boot into single user mode > > 2. fsck /# finishes successful! > > 3. mount -u / > > 4. Do a few edi

Re: [FreeBSD] Fix for ServerWorks HT1000 in upcoming 7.1?

2008-10-17 Thread Fernan Aguero
> > On Friday 10 October 2008 01:11:17 pm Fernan Aguero wrote: > > > John, > > > > > > thanks for the tip. I have now successfully gone through > > > the process of making a new bootable CD using the ATA_HT1000 > > > patched kernel. [snipped] > So far everything seems to be working OK ... compi

Re: Recommendations for servers running SATA drives [hot-swap]

2008-10-17 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Today I was replacing disk in one Sun Fire X2100 M2 so I tried hot-swapping. It was as you said: atacontrol de

Re: Status of Flash 9 on stable

2008-10-17 Thread Sean C. Farley
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Chagin Dmitry wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:48:52PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote: On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote: Hmm, finaly I noted this thread. There is one more patch in the pipeline for 7 that is needed, as I was told. Testing of that patch seems to be

Re: Recommendations for servers running SATA drives [hot-swap]

2008-10-17 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:09:17PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >>> Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Today I was replacing dis

Re: "mount -u -o ro" problems with 7-stable

2008-10-17 Thread Aragon Gouveia
| By Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | [ 2008-10-17 15:29 +0200 ] > > This is believed to be fixed for HEAD. I do not want to do MFC > > before 7.1. > > OK, that's good news. Thanks for the information. > So I'll watch the commit messages for the MFC a

constant zfs data corruption

2008-10-17 Thread JoaoBR
Hi constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI scrub is not able to repair, when comes to touch this files machines reboots, deleting and restorin also is not possíble, seems I need to delete the files, umoun

Re: constant zfs data corruption

2008-10-17 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 JoaoBR wrote: > Hi > > constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this > corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI > > scrub is not able to repair, when comes to touch this files machines reboots, > deleting a

Re: "mount -u -o ro" problems with 7-stable

2008-10-17 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 07:06:49PM +0200, Aragon Gouveia wrote: > | By Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | [ 2008-10-17 15:29 +0200 ] > > > This is believed to be fixed for HEAD. I do not want to do MFC > > > before 7.1. > > > > OK, that's good news. T

Re: constant zfs data corruption

2008-10-17 Thread Chuck Swiger
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, JoaoBR wrote: constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI Presumably your SATA drives are correctly being reported by ZFS as corrupting data, and you should do something like re

7.1 prelease, dump, dtrace

2008-10-17 Thread Tony Maher
Hello, Just some observations. I upgrade from 7.0 release to 7.1 prerelease (Oct 16) which went fine as usual :-) Then wanted to try dtrace. Initially just added options options KDTRACE_HOOKS options DDB_CTF options KDTRACE_FRAME Made kernel and rebooted ok. Then read

Re: Recommendations for servers running SATA drives [hot-swap]

2008-10-17 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:09:17PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: Today I was replaci

re0 problem

2008-10-17 Thread Daniel Gerzo
Hello guys, Recently, I have bought a pcmcia gige ethernet card and it seems it is re(4) based. However, when I plug the card into the slot, I get the following messages on my console: re0: port 0x1000-0x10ff mem 0x8800-0x88ff irq 21 at device 0.0 on cardbus0 re0: Chip rev.

Re: re0 problem

2008-10-17 Thread Pyun YongHyeon
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:15:04AM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Hello guys, > > Recently, I have bought a pcmcia gige ethernet card and it seems it > is re(4) based. However, when I plug the card into the slot, I get > the following messages on my console: > > re0: > port 0x100