Hi,
On 17 Oct 2008, at 1:15, Steven Hartland wrote:
You must be very careful with using less than 48bit addressing when
both
the drive and the controller supports it as some disks report errors
at
none standard crossover points.
I saw this first hand with the highpoint driver where it tota
Highly likely, as it was seagate disks I had this issue with. The comment
in the hptmv driver:-
+ /*
+* always use 48bit LBA if drive supports it.
+* Some Seagate drives report error if you use a 28-bit command
+* to access sector 0xfff.
+*/
- Original Message -
Fro
Hi,
This happened to me repeatedly (but not always), even
after updating to the latest RELENG_7 yesterday ...
1. Boot into single user mode
2. fsck /# finishes successful!
3. mount -u /
4. Do a few edits to files in /etc
5. mount -u -o ro /
softdep_waitidle: Failed to flush worklist for 0xc1f
On Thursday 16 October 2008 22:23:27 J.R. Oldroyd wrote:
> It works here, although my 7-stable is a few days old and I applied
> the linprocfs.c patch by hand.
>
> I also used the pre-compiled libflashsupport.so binary referred to in
> the thread.
>
> Then used nspluginwrapper to add links for na
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Today I was replacing disk in one Sun Fire X2100 M2 so I tried
hot-swapping. It was as you said: atacontrol detach ata3, replace the
HDD, atacontrol attach ata3 and new disk is in the system. I tried it
Hi,
Reference:
> From: "Julian Stacey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:32:04 +0200
> Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Julian Stacey" wrote:
> Hi stable@ & I added re@
> Summary:
> Seems I've found a regression error between 6.0-RELEASE &
> 7.1-BETA-i386-disc1.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:50:39PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This happened to me repeatedly (but not always), even
> after updating to the latest RELENG_7 yesterday ...
>
> 1. Boot into single user mode
> 2. fsck /# finishes successful!
> 3. mount -u /
> 4. Do a few edits to files
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>
>>> Today I was replacing disk in one Sun Fire X2100 M2 so I tried
>>> hot-swapping. It was as you said: atacontrol detach ata3, repl
Hi all
I've been having increasingly annoying Xorg crashes with 7.1, on a
previously very reliable laptop[1], and am now trying to go back to how
it used to work, starting off by downgrading kernel + world to
7.0-RELEASE, which used to work quite nicely. If that fails to make any
huge strides, I g
Hi stable & re,
> > Hi stable@ & I added re@
> > Summary:
> > Seems I've found a regression error between 6.0-RELEASE &
> > 7.1-BETA-i386-disc1.iso.
>
> I just installed 6.4-RC1-i386-disc1.iso & that works OK with rl0
> Now installing 7.1-BETA2-i386-disc1.iso & will report after.
The fault ( [rl
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 13:37:56 +0200, Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No audio often means libflashsupport can't find all lib dependencies.
I had noticed that a couple of dependencies were, in fact, missing.
Your email was very timely - I was just going to figure out how to
get them.
Hello Tom and FreeBSD friends,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:03:48PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've been having increasingly annoying Xorg crashes with 7.1, on a
> previously very reliable laptop[1], and am now trying to go back to how
> it used to work, starting off by downgrading kernel
Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This happened to me repeatedly (but not always), even
> > after updating to the latest RELENG_7 yesterday ...
> >
> > 1. Boot into single user mode
> > 2. fsck /# finishes successful!
> > 3. mount -u /
> > 4. Do a few edi
> > On Friday 10 October 2008 01:11:17 pm Fernan Aguero wrote:
> > > John,
> > >
> > > thanks for the tip. I have now successfully gone through
> > > the process of making a new bootable CD using the ATA_HT1000
> > > patched kernel.
[snipped]
> So far everything seems to be working OK ... compi
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Today I was replacing disk in one Sun Fire X2100 M2 so I tried
hot-swapping. It was as you said: atacontrol de
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Chagin Dmitry wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 06:48:52PM -0500, Sean C. Farley wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
Hmm, finaly I noted this thread. There is one more patch in the
pipeline for 7 that is needed, as I was told. Testing of that patch
seems to be
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:09:17PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
>>> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Today I was replacing dis
| By Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| [ 2008-10-17 15:29 +0200 ]
> > This is believed to be fixed for HEAD. I do not want to do MFC
> > before 7.1.
>
> OK, that's good news. Thanks for the information.
> So I'll watch the commit messages for the MFC a
Hi
constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this
corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
scrub is not able to repair, when comes to touch this files machines reboots,
deleting and restorin also is not possÃble, seems I need to delete the files,
umoun
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JoaoBR wrote:
> Hi
>
> constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool, this
> corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
>
> scrub is not able to repair, when comes to touch this files machines reboots,
> deleting a
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 07:06:49PM +0200, Aragon Gouveia wrote:
> | By Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> | [ 2008-10-17 15:29 +0200 ]
> > > This is believed to be fixed for HEAD. I do not want to do MFC
> > > before 7.1.
> >
> > OK, that's good news. T
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:30 AM, JoaoBR wrote:
constantly I find data corruption on ZFS volums, ever from rrdtool,
this
corrupt data happens on SATA disks, never seem on SCSI
Presumably your SATA drives are correctly being reported by ZFS as
corrupting data, and you should do something like re
Hello,
Just some observations.
I upgrade from 7.0 release to 7.1 prerelease (Oct 16) which went
fine as usual :-)
Then wanted to try dtrace. Initially just added options
options KDTRACE_HOOKS
options DDB_CTF
options KDTRACE_FRAME
Made kernel and rebooted ok. Then read
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 04:09:17PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:50:38PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:30:20PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Today I was replaci
Hello guys,
Recently, I have bought a pcmcia gige ethernet card and it seems it
is re(4) based. However, when I plug the card into the slot, I get
the following messages on my console:
re0:
port 0x1000-0x10ff mem 0x8800-0x88ff irq 21 at device 0.0 on
cardbus0
re0: Chip rev.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:15:04AM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> Recently, I have bought a pcmcia gige ethernet card and it seems it
> is re(4) based. However, when I plug the card into the slot, I get
> the following messages on my console:
>
> re0:
> port 0x100
26 matches
Mail list logo
