On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 10:13:05PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:52:09PM -0400, John R. Huston wrote:
> > Hi, I am not very familiar with using mailing lists so if I have made
> > a mistake in the format or scope of the message please correct me. I
> > am pretty despera
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
This is why I ask: I see a Western Digital hard disk which shows up as
ad0 on that system. It's claiming ATA100 mode, but there are features
of the ICH7 (often called "Compatibility Mode" in BIOSes) which allow a
SATA device to appear as a PATA device to work with older op
Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
(on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
everything appeared normal until about 0040 when the system became
non-responsive and this lasted until the dump completed at 1033. This
is the first full backup
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
> (on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
> everything appeared normal until about 0040 when the system became
> non-responsive and this l
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 12:27:59PM +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Did a fresh FreeBSD 7.1 install using the beta on amd64 from disc1. I
> did a standard-install with sources, performed a csup against RELENG_7
> and then a buildworld. It stops at:
>
> mv -f term.h.new term.h
> cc -m32 -mar
>> Did a fresh FreeBSD 7.1 install using the beta on amd64 from disc1. I
>> did a standard-install with sources, performed a csup against RELENG_7
>> and then a buildworld. It stops at:
>>
>> mv -f term.h.new term.h
>> cc -m32 -march=nocona -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT -iprefix
>> /usr/obj/usr/
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
> >> (on a PATA disk) t
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 08:48:09PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2008-Oct-15 02:08:48 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Oct
>> Did a fresh FreeBSD 7.1 install using the beta on amd64 from disc1. I
>> did a standard-install with sources, performed a csup against RELENG_7
>> and then a buildworld. It stops at:
>>
>> mv -f term.h.new term.h
>> cc -m32 -march=nocona -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT -iprefix
>> /usr/obj/usr/
Hi.
Did a fresh FreeBSD 7.1 install using the beta on amd64 from disc1. I
did a standard-install with sources, performed a csup against RELENG_7
and then a buildworld. It stops at:
mv -f term.h.new term.h
cc -m32 -march=nocona -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT -iprefix
/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/
Quoting Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From: Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:58 +0200
On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberman wrote:
> I have seen some messages that imply that flashplugin9 might be usable
> on STABLE. The port is sill marked IGNORE
On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> Last night, I attempted a full, compressed backup of my 181GB /home
>> (on a PATA disk) to a remote system. The backup started at 2159 and
>> everything appea
Claus Guttesen pisze:
Hi.
Did a fresh FreeBSD 7.1 install using the beta on amd64 from disc1. I
did a standard-install with sources, performed a csup against RELENG_7
and then a buildworld. It stops at:
mv -f term.h.new term.h
cc -m32 -march=nocona -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT -iprefix
/usr
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 09:44:15AM +0400, Oleg Sharoiko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 01:23 +0300, Panagiotis Christias wrote:
>
> > However, when we connect them to the CX3-40, create and mount a new
> > partition and then do something as simple as "tar -C /san -xf ports.tgz"
> > the sy
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 01:40:46PM +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> >> Did a fresh FreeBSD 7.1 install using the beta on amd64 from disc1. I
> >> did a standard-install with sources, performed a csup against RELENG_7
> >> and then a buildworld. It stops at:
> >>
> >> mv -f term.h.new term.h
> >> cc -
On 2008-Oct-15 02:08:48 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:58:43PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> On 2008-Oct-15 01:35:38 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 07:24:28PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> >> Last night, I
>> Based on progress reports from both dump and my fifo process, the
>> snapshot removal began about 10 hours _after_ the system froze
>> (during this time, dump wrote about 143GB). Given the timeline,
>> it's fairly clear that neither mksnap_ffs nor the 'rm snapshot'
>> were running at the time t
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081015 12:00] wrote:
>
> Perhaps a 'show locks' with an 8-CURRENT kernel with WITNESS enabled
> will shed light on the problem? As most of the filesystem locking
> doesn't use lockmgr in 7-STABLE, it would be silent with that kernel.
I might be wrong here,
During installworld I get:
cat /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/ncurses.3x
> ncurses.3
sh /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/MKterminfo.sh
/usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/terminfo.head
/usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 10:02:13PM +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> During installworld I get:
>
> cat /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/ncurses.3x
> > ncurses.3
> sh /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/MKterminfo.sh
> /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../
>> During installworld I get:
>>
>> cat /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/ncurses.3x
>> > ncurses.3
>> sh /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/MKterminfo.sh
>> /usr/src/lib/ncurses/ncurses/../../../contrib/ncurses/man/terminfo.head
>> /usr/src/lib/ncurs
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Has anyone else seen anything similar?
It's a known problem documented in my Wiki -- see "dump/restore". Note
the part about UFS2 snapshot generation. I'm almost certain this is
what you're describing.
I don't know how you can say this so confidently without even comp
Hi!
I've updated the patch I've tested on 6.3 for 6.4 (only offsets differ),
if anyone can test it I can file a PR so it hopefully :) can be committed:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/linprocfs-6.4.patch
(same patch for 6.3:
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/linprocfs-6.3.patch
) The
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 09:52:09PM -0400, John R. Huston wrote:
>> Hi, I am not very familiar with using mailing lists so if I have made
>> a mistake in the format or scope of the message please correct me. I
>> am pretty
> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:06:41 -0500
> From: eculp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Quoting Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> >> From: Tijl Coosemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:28:58 +0200
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 14 October 2008 20:30:47 Kevin Oberm
On 10/15/08, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081015 12:00] wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps a 'show locks' with an 8-CURRENT kernel with WITNESS enabled
>> will shed light on the problem? As most of the filesystem locking
>> doesn't use lockmgr in 7-STABLE
26 matches
Mail list logo
