Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Bartosz Stec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081003 07:23] wrote:
Hello again :)
With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when
copying files over network. Tested with both SAMBA and NFS. Is it normal?
FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Sep 6 01:52:12
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:02:33AM +0200, Bartosz Stec wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> * Bartosz Stec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081003 07:23] wrote:
>>
>>> Hello again :)
>>>
>>> With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when
>>> copying files over network. Tested with bot
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:02:33AM +0200, Bartosz Stec wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Bartosz Stec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081003 07:23] wrote:
Hello again :)
With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when
copying files over netw
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:29:35AM +0300, Andrei Kolu wrote:
...
> I remember when on FreeBSD 4.x I was able to copy files from samba and
> to samba up to 12MB/s on 100Mbit lan.
This part seems unlikely, particularly as bit rates are measured in
decimal millions not computer millions.
12*8*
> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:00:48 +0200
> From: Eirik Wix?e Svela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook?
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> I have an Apple MacBook with an Intel Co
Jeremy Chadwick pisze:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:02:33AM +0200, Bartosz Stec wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Bartosz Stec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081003 07:23] wrote:
Hello again :)
With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when
copying files over netw
Hi.
I think (IMHO) you can try some desktop orientated linux distro
(ubunutu; kubuntu)
or freebsd based PC-BSD desktop.
If you are more experienced user and know what you`re doing then you can
take some server orientated stuff
and install it also as desktop.
In fact it depends on your needs a
Bartosz Stec wrote:
BTW overall SAMBA performance still sucks on 7.1-pre as much as on
RELENG_5 ...:( - 7.5 MB/s peak.
7.5MB is 75% effeciency of a 100mbit card. Not amazing, but
not "sucks".
Where do you see faster performance?
Between windows machines on the same hardware or linux se
Clifton Royston wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:29:35AM +0300, Andrei Kolu wrote:
...
I remember when on FreeBSD 4.x I was able to copy files from samba and
to samba up to 12MB/s on 100Mbit lan.
This part seems unlikely, particularly as bit rates are measured in
decimal millions n
> 1 megabit = 106 = 1,000,000 bits which is equal to 125,000 bytes.
you are assuming eight bits per byte - but this is a serial line so
you should use ten bits per byte instead.
-pete.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:38:13AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote:
> Bartosz Stec wrote:
>
BTW overall SAMBA performance still sucks on 7.1-pre as much as on
RELENG_5 ...:( - 7.5 MB/s peak.
>>>
>>> 7.5MB is 75% effeciency of a 100mbit card. Not amazing, but
>>> not "sucks".
>>>
Hi all
I need to patch the gcc original sources to suit the FreeBSD, specially to
support FreeBSD kernel compilation. I have tried it, spent lot of time, but it
still develops compilation errors.
The FreeBSD stable comes with gcc-4.2.1 but the sources are scattered over the
/usr/src, therefore
Is there any possibility that heimdal 1.1 that works beautifully in
Current will be backported to FreeBSD-7.x?
Gunnar Flygt
Sveriges Radio Teknik/IT
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To u
My tries to tune smb.conf to achieve better performance expose very
strange bug:
Just executing:
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba reload
made my system unresponsible from network. It happens three times until
now so I'm sure that is the cause (but it happened after some succesful
reloads a couple
Hi all,
Sorry if this is a faq or something obvious, but
is there a reason why current version of samba 3.2.4
is not in ports? I only see 3.0.32 at the moment :-(
Best regards,
Holger
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
I am not sure why you would want to put FreeBSD on the Mac. Mac is
already FreeBSD. Most of the FreeBSD ports have been made available
to the Mac through Macports. X11 comes with it, and Apple gives you
access to the kernel source code.
If you must for some reason have FreeBSD, I recomme
>
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> > at the moment, the best I can do is run it on a different hardware that has
> > if_em, the results are in
> > ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/lock.prof/7.1-1000.em the
> > benchmark ran better with the Intel NIC, averaged UDP 54MB/s, TC
Hello list
I have a shutdown problem. I have a machine with gigabyte GA-G33M-DS2R
motherboard. Integrated network card is Realtek 8111B.
I can not wake the computer after I shutdown it from FreeBSD.
It is a dualboot system - windows xp and freebsd. If I shutdown the
computer from windows - later I
Sorry, I meant BSD.
Here is the link:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/press-rel-3.html
Aharon Friedman
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:25 AM, David Sanders wrote:
2008/10/6 Dr. Aharon Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I am not sure why you would want to put FreeBSD on the Mac. Mac is
already
FreeBSD. Most
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Dr. Aharon Friedman wrote:
Sorry, I meant BSD.
Here is the link:
http://www.freebsd.org/news/press-rel-3.html
Aharon Friedman
I don't see the origina message you replied to on the list, so am replying to
it via your post...
I'm just a lurker, but even I know that onl
Please wrap your mail before 80 columns.
On 2008-Oct-06 06:19:34 -0700, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The FreeBSD stable comes with gcc-4.2.1 but the sources are scattered
>over the /usr/src, therefore, I find it difficult to re-create the
>gcc-4.2.1 to its original directory layout to make a
In that case I'm out of options. Maybe somebody else on the list can
respond.
Succes,
Ronald.
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:51:35 +0200, Henrik Friedrichsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
USB support in the BIOS? What kind of support does the BIOS provide that
you can disable?
I'm only able to dis
Thanks Robert,
I just did not want to go into a lot of details. My bottom line was
that unless you want to run a very specific port that has not been
ported to Mac OSX (these are quite rare), I do not see the reason to
install FreeBSD on a Mac Book. As for X11 it is maintained as a
sepa
I would like to second that. The heimdal in 7.0 is quite old. It is in
fact inoperable with an mit kerberos realm when using ssh. The byte
order is incorrect such that you get MIC checksum failures. After much
googling (not documented in the krb5.conf man page or handbook) I found
that a fi
24 matches
Mail list logo