Re: fxp performance with POLLING

Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Bartosz Stec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081003 07:23] wrote: Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over network. Tested with both SAMBA and NFS. Is it normal? FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Sep 6 01:52:12

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:02:33AM +0200, Bartosz Stec wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> * Bartosz Stec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081003 07:23] wrote: >> >>> Hello again :) >>> >>> With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when >>> copying files over network. Tested with bot

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:02:33AM +0200, Bartosz Stec wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Bartosz Stec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081003 07:23] wrote: Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over netw

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:29:35AM +0300, Andrei Kolu wrote: ... > I remember when on FreeBSD 4.x I was able to copy files from samba and > to samba up to 12MB/s on 100Mbit lan. This part seems unlikely, particularly as bit rates are measured in decimal millions not computer millions. 12*8*

Re: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook?

> Date: Sat, 04 Oct 2008 21:00:48 +0200 > From: Eirik Wix?e Svela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook? > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > I have an Apple MacBook with an Intel Co

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

Jeremy Chadwick pisze: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:02:33AM +0200, Bartosz Stec wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Bartosz Stec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081003 07:23] wrote: Hello again :) With POLLING enabled I experience about 10%-25% performance drop when copying files over netw

Re: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook?

Hi. I think (IMHO) you can try some desktop orientated linux distro (ubunutu; kubuntu) or freebsd based PC-BSD desktop. If you are more experienced user and know what you`re doing then you can take some server orientated stuff and install it also as desktop. In fact it depends on your needs a

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

Bartosz Stec wrote: BTW overall SAMBA performance still sucks on 7.1-pre as much as on RELENG_5 ...:( - 7.5 MB/s peak. 7.5MB is 75% effeciency of a 100mbit card. Not amazing, but not "sucks". Where do you see faster performance? Between windows machines on the same hardware or linux se

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

Clifton Royston wrote: On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 10:29:35AM +0300, Andrei Kolu wrote: ... I remember when on FreeBSD 4.x I was able to copy files from samba and to samba up to 12MB/s on 100Mbit lan. This part seems unlikely, particularly as bit rates are measured in decimal millions n

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

> 1 megabit = 106 = 1,000,000 bits which is equal to 125,000 bytes. you are assuming eight bits per byte - but this is a serial line so you should use ten bits per byte instead. -pete. ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.or

Re: fxp performance with POLLING

On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:38:13AM -0400, Adam McDougall wrote: > Bartosz Stec wrote: > BTW overall SAMBA performance still sucks on 7.1-pre as much as on RELENG_5 ...:( - 7.5 MB/s peak. >>> >>> 7.5MB is 75% effeciency of a 100mbit card. Not amazing, but >>> not "sucks". >>>

Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1

Hi all I need to patch the gcc original sources to suit the FreeBSD, specially to support FreeBSD kernel compilation. I have tried it, spent lot of time, but it still develops compilation errors. The FreeBSD stable comes with gcc-4.2.1 but the sources are scattered over the /usr/src, therefore

Possibility of backporting of Heimdal 1.1

Is there any possibility that heimdal 1.1 that works beautifully in Current will be backported to FreeBSD-7.x? Gunnar Flygt Sveriges Radio Teknik/IT ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To u

reloading samba config made system unresponsible

My tries to tune smb.conf to achieve better performance expose very strange bug: Just executing: /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba reload made my system unresponsible from network. It happens three times until now so I'm sure that is the cause (but it happened after some succesful reloads a couple

Samba 3.2.4 not in ports?

Hi all, Sorry if this is a faq or something obvious, but is there a reason why current version of samba 3.2.4 is not in ports? I only see 3.0.32 at the moment :-( Best regards, Holger ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/

Re: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook? --- WHY?

I am not sure why you would want to put FreeBSD on the Mac. Mac is already FreeBSD. Most of the FreeBSD ports have been made available to the Mac through Macports. X11 comes with it, and Apple gives you access to the kernel source code. If you must for some reason have FreeBSD, I recomme

Re: bad NFS/UDP performance

> > On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Danny Braniss wrote: > > > at the moment, the best I can do is run it on a different hardware that has > > if_em, the results are in > > ftp://ftp.cs.huji.ac.il/users/danny/lock.prof/7.1-1000.em the > > benchmark ran better with the Intel NIC, averaged UDP 54MB/s, TC

can not wake on lan after halt -p (or shutdown -p now) on releng_7 and releng_7_0

Hello list I have a shutdown problem. I have a machine with gigabyte GA-G33M-DS2R motherboard. Integrated network card is Realtek 8111B. I can not wake the computer after I shutdown it from FreeBSD. It is a dualboot system - windows xp and freebsd. If I shutdown the computer from windows - later I

Re: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook? --- WHY?

Sorry, I meant BSD. Here is the link: http://www.freebsd.org/news/press-rel-3.html Aharon Friedman On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:25 AM, David Sanders wrote: 2008/10/6 Dr. Aharon Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I am not sure why you would want to put FreeBSD on the Mac. Mac is already FreeBSD. Most

Re: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook? --- WHY?

On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Dr. Aharon Friedman wrote: Sorry, I meant BSD. Here is the link: http://www.freebsd.org/news/press-rel-3.html Aharon Friedman I don't see the origina message you replied to on the list, so am replying to it via your post... I'm just a lurker, but even I know that onl

Re: Help me to develop a FreeBSD patch for gcc-4.2.1

Please wrap your mail before 80 columns. On 2008-Oct-06 06:19:34 -0700, Unga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The FreeBSD stable comes with gcc-4.2.1 but the sources are scattered >over the /usr/src, therefore, I find it difficult to re-create the >gcc-4.2.1 to its original directory layout to make a

Re: USB detach/attach hangs with 7.0-RELEASE and 7.1-PRERELEASE

In that case I'm out of options. Maybe somebody else on the list can respond. Succes, Ronald. On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:51:35 +0200, Henrik Friedrichsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: USB support in the BIOS? What kind of support does the BIOS provide that you can disable? I'm only able to dis

Re: Is FreeBSD a suitable choice for a MacBook? --- WHY?

Thanks Robert, I just did not want to go into a lot of details. My bottom line was that unless you want to run a very specific port that has not been ported to Mac OSX (these are quite rare), I do not see the reason to install FreeBSD on a Mac Book. As for X11 it is maintained as a sepa

Re: Possibility of backporting of Heimdal 1.1

I would like to second that. The heimdal in 7.0 is quite old. It is in fact inoperable with an mit kerberos realm when using ssh. The byte order is incorrect such that you get MIC checksum failures. After much googling (not documented in the krb5.conf man page or handbook) I found that a fi