Many people have reported that the *order* of the extensions in
extensions.ini has adverse (positive) effects on PHP segfaults on
FreeBSD.
I myself haven't ever run into extension ordering issues like those
described (and we've done hosting for years), but I don't doubt those
who have experienced
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 05:41 -0500, Greg Miller wrote:
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 03:22 -0500, Greg Miller wrote:
I'm using an AKB-430UG USB keyboard ("Win-Touch Pro") on FreeBSD
7.0-release-p1, or trying to. The keyboard works fine in Windows, but
with
Hello everyone,
I know -stable is supposed to be, well, stable, but I seem to be in a
bit of a pickle.
I'm trying to import my zfs file system from a Macintosh machine. It
was created at version 8. Being new to zfs, I did not realise that
FreeBSD would be running at a lower version; I thought zfs
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 06:40:22PM +1000, Timothy Wilson wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I know -stable is supposed to be, well, stable, but I seem to be in a
> bit of a pickle.
>
> I'm trying to import my zfs file system from a Macintosh machine. It
> was created at version 8. Being new to zfs, I d
Timothy Wilson wrote:
Hello everyone,
I know -stable is supposed to be, well, stable, but I seem to be in a
bit of a pickle.
I'm trying to import my zfs file system from a Macintosh machine. It
was created at version 8. Being new to zfs, I did not realise that
FreeBSD would be running at a lowe
>> So either I want to downgrade the zpool, or upgrade zfs on FreeBSD.
>> Does anyone know if I'll be able to import zfs v8, or am I wasting my
>> time? I'd prefer to follow -stable, but if I must follow -current,
>> then golly goshkins, I'll have no choice!
>
> I don't know what the current migrat
Timothy Wilson wrote:
> I'm trying to import my zfs file system from a Macintosh machine. It
> was created at version 8. Being new to zfs, I did not realise that
> FreeBSD would be running at a lower version; I thought zfs was zfs! Of
> course, trying to import my zpool fails, complaining that th
Hi,
I just did two different installations of 7.0-stable on a new machine
and I have some issues with the boot0 boot loader. I have two identical
drives on that machine. The first two slices on the drives are supposed
to be bootable and they are mirrored with gmirror:
gmirror label -v -h -b
There's nothing you can do right now except for wait. By default the zfs
implementation on osx will create a zfs version 6 zpool (to retain
compat with the read-only kext that ships with 10.5) but once you've
upgraded you can't go back.
There is a newer version of zfs for freebsd but it hasn't
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, fbsd2 wrote:
Given recent EOL announcements, I'm trying to upgrade an ancient machine
from 5.5 to 7. It has 80 Mb total in the root partition, /home/, /var/,
/usr/, and /tmp/ on other partitions, and NFS mounts /usr/src, /usr/obj, and
/usr/ports from a slightly newer/fa
On Jun 13, 2008, at 09:54, Dillon Kass wrote:
Your only option is to wait until this is committed or patches are
offered at least.
pjd is the man so it shouldn't be too long :-)
Another option could be to see if you can help with the coding. :)
___
Le Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:57:35 +0200,
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
Hello,
[...]
> > #17 0xc0700746 in crypto_invoke (cap=0x8, crp=0xd61a0950,
> > hint=-1616994916) at cryptodev_if.h:53
> > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> > (kgdb)
>
> Unfortunately the trace i
While preparing to upgrade to latest stable, I ran some scripts to verify
that the target was OK and found something that I think I need to fix but
have no clue to how.
This is the essence of what I found:
# ls /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/auto/APR/PerlIO/*
autospl
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Da Rock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 09:18 -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
: > On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:58 AM, M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > > Da Rock <[EMA
14 matches
Mail list logo
