John Baldwin wrote:
Try this patch. I'm not 100% certain this will fix it as I can't reproduce
the issue, but I think it might help. Specifically, when the boot code makes
a v86 call, the loader/boot2/whatever swaps in/out a new set of registers via
the v86 structure including the eflags regis
I wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Try this patch. I'm not 100% certain this will fix it as I can't
reproduce
the issue, but I think it might help. Specifically, when the boot
code makes
a v86 call, the loader/boot2/whatever swaps in/out a new set of
registers via
the v86 structure including the
On Fri, 23 May 2008 09:37:01 +0300
Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> But, by the way, there is a (slightly) more valid reason to want to
> >> create a directory under /dev, I recently had it. For one non-standard
> >> third-party application I needed to create a link to existing devic
Please note that unionfs still has a few bugs!
You will need at least patchset p19 for mounting devfs below/above
unionfs mounts.
There is also a patchset p20, still experimental, you might want to try it.
-- Jille
Oliver Fromme schreef:
Andriy Gapon wrote:
> But, by the way, there is a (sli
--- Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 23, 2008, at 6:37 PM, Unga wrote:
> > When open an pdf has two types of scenarios in
> FreeBSD:
> > 1. When X run as a realtime-prio process, X go mad
> and swallow up
> > almost all of CPU cycles, making audio hiccups.
> >
> > 2. When X run
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 08:33:01PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> I wrote:
> >John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >>Try this patch. I'm not 100% certain this will fix it as I can't
> >>reproduce
> >>the issue, but I think it might help. Specifically, when the boot
> >>code makes
> >>a v86 call, the loade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gavin Atkinson wrote:
| On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 09:58 -0700, Xin LI wrote:
|> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
|> Hash: SHA1
|>
|> Gavin Atkinson wrote:
|> | FWIW, there have been probably around 10 PRs in in the last few months
|> | about this behavi
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 08:33:01PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> I wrote:
> >John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >>Try this patch. I'm not 100% certain this will fix it as I can't
> >>reproduce
> >>the issue, but I think it might help. Specifically, when the boot
> >>code makes
> >>a v86 call, the loade
Peter Holm wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 08:33:01PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Try this patch. I'm not 100% certain this will fix it as I can't
reproduce
the issue, but I think it might help. Specifically, when the boot
code makes
a v86 call, th
Peter Holm wrote:
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 08:33:01PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
I wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
Try this patch. I'm not 100% certain this will fix it as I can't
reproduce
the issue, but I think it might help. Specifically, when the boot
code makes
a v86 call, th
Hello,
I have been struglling with sysinstall, attempting to make it handle
the geometry of some large SATA drives. After a lot of effort I
decided to stop suffering and modified the program in order to
circumvent the outdated limit of 65535 cylinders (see attached patch).
I'm thinking about submi
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 02:23:11PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Peter Holm wrote:
> >On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 08:33:01PM +1200, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> >
> >>I wrote:
> >>
> >>>John Baldwin wrote:
> >>>
> Try this patch. I'm not 100% certain this will fix it as I can't
> reprod
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 11:52:06PM -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> I have been struglling with sysinstall, attempting to make it handle
> the geometry of some large SATA drives. After a lot of effort I
> decided to stop suffering and modified the program in order to
> circumvent the outdate
13 matches
Mail list logo
