>Hi all
>I have noted early April that RELENG_7 is upgraded to
>sched_ule by default and gave it a try with sched_ule
>until today. My desktop is a 3GHz single Intel Pentium
>4 processor with 512MB RAM. I have noted by desktop
>response wise sched_4bsd is better, ie. the desktop is
>more responsi
Hi Bjoern,
Was looking at that page, but my kernel doesn't have debug enabled.
Someone suggested getting a backtrace using the vanilla kernel, that
kernel should still be in /boot/kernel but I can't get it to fly!
/boot/kernel.old]# kgdb /boot/kernel.old/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.0
[GDB will not b
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Spil Oss wrote:
Yesterday my to-be server running FreeBSD 7.0 #0 has rebooted after a
kernel panic.
FreeBSD newserver.example.net 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Fri
Apr 4 07:22:22 CEST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTIE70 i386
Please find messages a
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:52:56 -0700
> From: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Damian Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: RELENG_6_3 ping and DUP packets
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:48:10AM +0200, Dami
Hi,
Does anyone have experience with running Sun's Opteron-based
workstation, Ultra 20, 25, 40? Both with FreeBSD and other systems
(Linux)? Are they stable, all the drivers are present, etc?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(kern/114438 btw)
--
Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst
http://hur.st/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
* Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have disks on the internal ICH7 adapters (on the motherboard), SATA,
> and also a TWE controller with two disks.
>
> When hitting the TWE controller hard I can hose the I/O performance on
> the primary (onboard) adapter quite severely to the point t
Yesterday my to-be server running FreeBSD 7.0 #0 has rebooted after a
kernel panic.
FreeBSD newserver.example.net 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0: Fri
Apr 4 07:22:22 CEST 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTIE70 i386
Please find messages and kernel-configuration attached.
This
> I have noted early April that RELENG_7 is upgraded to
> sched_ule by default and gave it a try with sched_ule
> until today. My desktop is a 3GHz single Intel Pentium
> 4 processor with 512MB RAM. I have noted by desktop
> response wise sched_4bsd is better, ie. the desktop is
> more responsive.
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
FYI: I've begun the MFC of procstat(1) from HEAD to RELENG_7. This requires
merging a number of kernel changes, and then the command line tool, so it
will occur over the next day or so. I'll send out a further e-mail when the
merge is done.
I beli
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 05:07:24PM -0500, H. Wade Minter wrote:
> The install went fine, but post-install I'm running into a problem
> where the USB keyboard will just lock up. I can still ping and SSH
> into the system, but after about 2 minutes of activity, the keyboard
> becomes nonrespon
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:51:15AM +0200, Damian Weber wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:52:56 -0700
> > From: Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Damian Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: RELENG_6_3
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:22:12AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
> Hi Bjoern,
>
> Was looking at that page, but my kernel doesn't have debug enabled.
Rebuild the kernel with debugging symbols, or do you not have the disk
space for it?
> Someone suggested getting a backtrace using the vanilla kernel, th
--- Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have noted early April that RELENG_7 is upgraded
> to
> > sched_ule by default and gave it a try with
> sched_ule
> > until today. My desktop is a 3GHz single Intel
> Pentium
> > 4 processor with 512MB RAM. I have noted by
> desktop
> > response wi
> What I refer is, when quickly open multiple tabs (7 or
> 8) in firefox and click on the fist tab to type user
> id while other tabs still downloading, its seems there
> is a minor yet noticeable delay that I did not
> experience with sched_4bsd.
Ah, O.K. - havent noticed that, and it wouldnt bot
--- Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What I refer is, when quickly open multiple tabs
> (7 or
> > 8) in firefox and click on the fist tab to type
> user
> > id while other tabs still downloading, its seems
> there
> > is a minor yet noticeable delay that I did not
> > experience with sc
Ivan Voras wrote, on 4/11/2008 2:57 AM:
> Does anyone have experience with running Sun's Opteron-based
> workstation, Ultra 20, 25, 40? Both with FreeBSD and other systems
> (Linux)? Are they stable, all the drivers are present, etc?
I haven't, but this fellow appears to have tried 6.1-R:
http://
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:48:10AM +0200, Damian Weber wrote:
From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Damian Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RELENG_6_3 ping and DUP packets
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian
Dear folks,
there seems to be some problem in SCSI/CAM code in RELENG_7:
--
>>> stage 3.2: building everything
--
cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/real; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj
MACH
Hi,
there are some errors in:
--
>>> stage 3.2: building everything
--
cd /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/real; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj
MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 CPUTYPE=pentiu
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 03:40:48PM -0400, Mike Andrews wrote:
> While rebooting to try disabling MSI, I noticed that the machine was still
> pingable during the reboot (and returning just one response each), while
> the thing was still doing its POST routines -- which of course made me do a
> fe
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:33:16AM +0100, Thomas Hurst wrote:
> * Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > I have disks on the internal ICH7 adapters (on the motherboard), SATA,
> > and also a TWE controller with two disks.
> >
> > When hitting the TWE controller hard I can hose the I/O pe
On 12/04/2008, Juraj Lutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear folks,
>
> there seems to be some problem in SCSI/CAM code in RELENG_7:
>
> --
> >>> stage 3.2: building everything
> -
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:57:53PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>Does anyone have experience with running Sun's Opteron-based
>workstation, Ultra 20, 25, 40? Both with FreeBSD and other systems
>(Linux)? Are they stable, all the drivers are present, etc?
I've not used any of these but:
1) The Ultra 25
pluknet wrote:
Are you using modified CFLAGS in make.conf ?
I see -Os in your build and I could reproduce it with -Os.
It's FAQ that -Os flag is not recommended.
Try with default optimization flags, please.
Just for the record, with default CFLAGS I am getting kind of:
-997 bytes availabl
pluknet wrote:
Are you using modified CFLAGS in make.conf ?
I see -Os in your build and I could reproduce it with -Os.
It's FAQ that -Os flag is not recommended.
Try with default optimization flags, please.
With empty src.conf it works, but anyway, it used to work even with -Os
before.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:27:48PM +0200, Juraj Lutter wrote:
> On the other hand, aren't those uninitialized variables potentionally a
> "bug"?
Potentially, yes, but not guaranteed.
The existing -STABLE tree emits a very large number of warnings. I'm a
strong advocate of using -Werror (treat w
2008/4/11 Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:57:53PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >Does anyone have experience with running Sun's Opteron-based
> >workstation, Ultra 20, 25, 40? Both with FreeBSD and other systems
> >(Linux)? Are they stable, all the drivers are present
28 matches
Mail list logo
