In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal
delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in
/etc/make.conf
In 7.0 there is no detection of such a flag. How should I continue to
NOT build the 0.6.3 heimdal that is deliverd with 7.0? I want to use the
On 2008-04-10 13:24, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal
> delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in
> /etc/make.conf
>
> In 7.0 there is no detection of such a flag.
All the NO_XXX flags have been obsoleted, use
On 2008-04-10 13:56, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> All the NO_XXX flags have been obsoleted, use WITHOUT_KERBEROS=yes
> instead. See src.conf(5) for more information.
Btw, you also need to put these directives in /etc/src.conf, not
/etc/make.conf. See /usr/src/UPDATING, under 20060317.
___
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:56:12PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2008-04-10 13:24, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> > In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal
> > delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in
> > /etc/make.conf
> >
> > In 7.0 there is
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:58:40AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > >> Signing binaries could be naturally tied in with securelevel, where some
> > >> securelevel (1?) would mean kernel no longer accepts new keys.
> > >
> > >
Peter Wemm wrote:
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Roland Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 10:58:40AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> >> Signing binaries could be naturally tied in with securelevel, where some
> >> securelevel (1?) would mean kernel no longer accepts new keys
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 04:39:56PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
[..]
>
> csjp@ had a mac_chkexec module that looks like it was never committed.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/mailing.freebsd.hackers/msg/074eec7def84c52b
>
> Shouldn't be hard to update it.
>
Just a few notes:
- This isn't r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dimitry Andric) writes:
>On 2008-04-10 13:24, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
>> In earlier version of FreeBSD I've been able to NOT include the heimdal
>> delivered with the system, by providing the flag NO_KERBEROS=yes in
>> /etc/make.conf
>>
>> In 7.0 there is no detection of such a fla
J. Porter Clark wrote:
gnome-vfs won't compile with WITHOUT_KERBEROS=yes for some
reason or other. Ugh.
Another reason to have permanent WITHOUT_GNOMEVFS=yes in /etc/make.conf ;-)
--Marcin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 2:45 AM, Lev Serebryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, freebsd-stable.
>
> Does somebody use some software RAID5 on FreeBSD in real production
> system?
>
> I want to build storage server for my home: RAW photos, multi-layer
> PhotoShop files and FLAC-encoded music
On Wednesday 09 April 2008 04:32:48 pm Marcin Cieslak wrote:
>
> > It would be these changes. Debugging this will be hard. :( Are you
familiar
> > with x86 assembly at all?
> >
>
> I have a bit different problem: The box (old Pentium-MMX PC with the FIC
> PA-2005 board using VT82C580 (Apollo
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 07:46:41 pm Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> On 08/04/2008, at 11:59 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 April 2008 04:06:24 am Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> >> FreeBSD dash.ish.com.au 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #10
> >> i386 with PAE (5Gb RAM)
> >>
> >>
> >> We've h
FYI: I've begun the MFC of procstat(1) from HEAD to RELENG_7. This requires
merging a number of kernel changes, and then the command line tool, so it will
occur over the next day or so. I'll send out a further e-mail when the merge
is done.
Robert N M Watson
Computer Laboratory
University
Hello list,
after upgrading from RELENG_6_2 to RELENG_6_3, I'm seeing
duplicate packets when pinging the upgraded machine.
I'm somewhat stuck, didn't find anything useful on the Web,
so I'm asking the list, what I should try next.
BTW, everything else works fine (ssh, NFS mount, NIS,).
- - -
FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #9: Sat Mar 29 08:31:56 CST 2008 [EMAIL
PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KSD-SMP
Running generally well.
I have disks on the internal ICH7 adapters (on the motherboard), SATA, and
also a TWE controller with two disks.
When hitting the TWE controller hard I can hose the I/
http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/1.jpg
http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/2.jpg
http://www.ish.com.au/s/LOR/3.jpg (this overlaps with [2])
These are all garbage in kuickshow. :(
They work fine for me in Firefox. But don't know what sort of jpegs
the Sony camera saves. Anyhow I've also now resaved them
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 10:49:55PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
> FYI: I've begun the MFC of procstat(1) from HEAD to RELENG_7. This
> requires merging a number of kernel changes, and then the command line
> tool, so it will occur over the next day or so. I'll send out a further
> e-mail when t
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian Weber wrote:
But here is the problem, pinging the machine from remote gives
A.B.C.X$ ping A.B.C.D
PING A.B.C.D (A.B.C.D): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms
64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.391 ms (DUP!)
Plea
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 17:07 -0500, H. Wade Minter wrote:
> I have a Dell Optiplex 755, with an Intel Core 2 Duo chip. I have
> installed 7-RELEASE/amd64 on it. 2GB of RAM, 6GB of swap.
>
> The install went fine, but post-install I'm running into a problem
> where the USB keyboard will just l
Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian Weber wrote:
But here is the problem, pinging the machine from remote gives
A.B.C.X$ ping A.B.C.D
PING A.B.C.D (A.B.C.D): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.272 ms
64 bytes from A.B.C.D: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0
Hi all
I have noted early April that RELENG_7 is upgraded to
sched_ule by default and gave it a try with sched_ule
until today. My desktop is a 3GHz single Intel Pentium
4 processor with 512MB RAM. I have noted by desktop
response wise sched_4bsd is better, ie. the desktop is
more responsive.
It
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
(4) FreeBSD 7 + ZFS "zraid". And again: stability. Too many messages
about locks, crashes, etc. Code is experemental. Is it only for
32 bit systems?
Recently I installed a new server in my local network.
[media butcher]# uname -rsm
FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT amd64
[m
> From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Damian Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: RELENG_6_3 ping and DUP packets
>
> On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian Weber wrote:
> > But here is the problem, pinging the machine from remote gives
> >
> > A.B.C.X$
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 08:48:10AM +0200, Damian Weber wrote:
> > From: Chuck Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Damian Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: RELENG_6_3 ping and DUP packets
> >
> > On Apr 10, 2008, at 1:58 PM, Damian Weber wrote:
> > > But h
24 matches
Mail list logo
