Hello list!
We have feeBSD 6.2 machines with local subnets on the servers and would
like to allow access to the internet only for workstations with exact
IP/MAC pairs and deny access for not predefined pairs.
Is there a solution in firewall settings?
Thanks
_
Hi,
On 31 Jan 2008, at 18:30, Szemerédy Gábor wrote:
Hello list!
We have feeBSD 6.2 machines with local subnets on the servers and
would like to allow access to the internet only for workstations
with exact IP/MAC pairs and deny access for not predefined pairs.
Is there a solution in firew
Greetings,
Szemerédy Gábor wrote:
Hello list!
We have feeBSD 6.2 machines with local subnets on the servers and
would like to allow access to the internet only for workstations with
exact IP/MAC pairs and deny access for not predefined pairs.
Is there a solution in firewall settings?
man arp
On Thursday 31 January 2008 12:28:02 am Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> It is printed whenever a kernel module is loaded.
> >>> The modules load OK. Nothing special or different about them.
> >>>
> >>>
> ...
> > The kernel is a link_elf type object I believe, so you have t
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> The problem is as follows:
> 1. put udf_load="YES" in loader.conf
> 2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
> 3. you can kldunload udf if no udf filesystems are mounted
> 4. now mount udf fs while udf.ko is unloaded
> 5. udf is
on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> The problem is as follows:
>> 1. put udf_load="YES" in loader.conf
>> 2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
>> 3. you can kldunload udf if no udf filesystems are mounted
>>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:06:40PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:16:36PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 05:15:47PM +0400, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 11:14:33AM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 11:44
> I think the problem is that the header for the FACP table crossed a page
> boundary so we had to map 2 pages to map the header, but the code assumes
> only 1 page is needed so when the second page was mapped, it overlapped with
> the page holding the XSDT. Here's a fix:
Excellent, that fixes
I have machine with FreeBSD 4.11.
I want to upgrade system and install FreeBSD 6.3, but I have some problem.
System boot from CDROM system stoped on screen with selection choise of booting
(default, single user mode and other).
System dont't write any error message...
Can somebody help me?
dmesg:
on 31/01/2008 14:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following:
>> On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> The problem is as follows:
>>> 1. put udf_load="YES" in loader.conf
>>> 2. you can mount and unmount udf filesystems
>>> 3.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:30:53AM -0800, Szemer?dy G?bor wrote:
> We have feeBSD 6.2 machines with local subnets on the servers and would
> like to allow access to the internet only for workstations with exact
> IP/MAC pairs and deny access for not predefined pairs.
> Is there a solution in fir
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe the options you're referring to are LOADER_TFTP_SUPPORT and
> LOADER_NFS_SUPPORT. Even if you define LOADER_NFS_SUPPORT=no, loader(8)
> will still resort to using NFS. I've confirmed this on a couple
> occasions by defining PXE_DEBUG=1 and
On Thursday 31 January 2008 10:05:57 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 31/01/2008 14:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following:
> >> On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>> The problem is as follows:
> >>> 1. put udf_load="YES"
On Thursday 31 January 2008 07:39:52 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> The problem is as follows:
> >> 1. put udf_load="YES" in loader.conf
> >> 2. you can mount and unmount udf filesys
on 31/01/2008 18:52 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Thursday 31 January 2008 10:05:57 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 31/01/2008 14:39 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>>> on 31/01/2008 13:07 John Baldwin said the following:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 12:39:14 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
Hello all,
System:
FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Wed Jan 16 18:39:53 PST 2008
Context:
After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of Apache13-ssl
and friends built and installed from source (see thread:
/usr/bin/objformat, for
more background). I chose to look at the possibility
> After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of Apache13-ssl
> and friends built and installed from source (see thread: /usr/bin/objformat,
> for more background). I chose to look at the possibility of using Apache 2.0.
Out of interest, why did you choose 2.0 and not 2.2 ? When I
At 08:24 PM 1/30/2008, Steven Hartland wrote:
The plot thickens This stall is not just related to newfs you have to
have gstat running as well. If I do the newfs without gstat running then
no stall occurs. As soon as Im running gstat while doing the newfs then
everything locks as described.
Quoting Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of Apache13-ssl
and friends built and installed from source (see thread: /usr/bin/objformat,
for more background). I chose to look at the possibility of using
Apache 2.0.
Out of interest, why
> also already subscribed to the Apache dev list). My conclusion was that
> the ultimate migration to 2, would be a lot smoother, and easier if moving
> to 2.0 - the layout of both the server, and conf files are /very/ similar
> (to 1.3).
O.K., that makes a lot of sense - I can't remember how I di
Quoting "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello all,
System:
FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Wed Jan 16 18:39:53 PST 2008
Context:
After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of Apache13-ssl
and friends built and installed from source (see thread:
/usr/bin/objformat, for
more backgr
Hello Peter, and thank you for your thoughtful reply.
Quoting Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
also already subscribed to the Apache dev list). My conclusion was that
the ultimate migration to 2, would be a lot smoother, and easier if moving
to 2.0 - the layout of both the server, and conf file
> Well, to be Frank with you ( even though my name is Chris ;) ), having
> to migrate ~50 conf files/layouts on top of "mastering" the /new/ Apache
> way of doing things, on top of aquainting myself with the way the
> modules /now/ do things, just isn't going to fit in my schedule. Oh sure
> I hear
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Lawrence Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Chris,
Firstly, a disclaimer: I'm not an expert so I might be behind the
times on what I'm about to tell you...
Note taken. :)
Chris H. wrote:
> Hello all,
> System:
> FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Wed J
Hi Chris,
Firstly, a disclaimer: I'm not an expert so I might be behind the times
on what I'm about to tell you...
Chris H. wrote:
> Hello all,
> System:
> FreeBSD 7.0-PRERELEASE i386 Wed Jan 16 18:39:53 PST 2008
>
> Context:
> After several failed attempts to get a /stable/ installation of
>
Hello Pete, and thank you for your continued input. I really appreciate it.
Quoting Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Well, to be Frank with you ( even though my name is Chris ;) ), having
to migrate ~50 conf files/layouts on top of "mastering" the /new/ Apache
way of doing things, on top of aqu
> I may try that. But I'm at a loss as to what that has to do with
> getting php5 to build. As (mentioned earlier) I am unable to find
> where php5 does anything more that to ask if I'm using Apache 1.3 || 2.
This puzzles me - my php5 from ports doesnt ask this at all. You just
build it and it fin
[I've kept your ccs, but I'm only subscribed to -stable]
On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Chris H. wrote:
> Hello Pete, and thank you for your continued input. I really appreciate it.
>
> Quoting Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[.. huge snip.. ]
> > How about try configuring it *not* to build the apa
Quoting Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I may try that. But I'm at a loss as to what that has to do with
getting php5 to build. As (mentioned earlier) I am unable to find
where php5 does anything more that to ask if I'm using Apache 1.3 || 2.
This puzzles me - my php5 from ports doesnt ask th
Hi Chris,
Chris H. wrote:
Hello, and thank you for your reply.
Quoting Lawrence Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Chris,
Firstly, a disclaimer: I'm not an expert so I might be behind the
times on what I'm about to tell you...
Note taken. :)
Chris H. wrote:
> Hello all,
> System:
> FreeB
30 matches
Mail list logo
