Re: Server motherboard recommendation wanted

2007-12-16 Thread Chris H.
Quoting Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: We have great success using the Tyan Thunder K8SD-Pro (S2882-D) motherboard. It is a dual socket 940 motherboard that supports AMD Opteron 200-series CPU (including dual-core), 16 GB ECC DDR400 RAM, with 2 64-bit/133 MHz PCI-X slots, 2 64-bit/100 MHz PCI

Right way to use geli + gjournal ?

2007-12-16 Thread Norberto Meijome
Hi everyone, In my laptop, I am running 7.0 Beta-4 (today's kernel + world). my /usr (ad0s1f ) is using gjournal, with its journal on ad0s1h . I have it mounted with what I believe are the recommended settings: $ mount [...] /dev/ad0s1f.journal on /usr (ufs, asynchronous, local, noatime, gjourn

Is it safe to use CPUTYPE?=native on 7.0 ?

2007-12-16 Thread Pete French
fairly simple question really - on machines where I never use the compiled binaries anywhere else, is it O.K. to set the CPU type to 'native' in make.conf ? According to gcc this should detect the processor type and set the various flas as approrpiate, which is nice, as we have a mix of P3, P4 and

-net or kernel: where does this belong?

2007-12-16 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Posted on -questions but got no response, trying -current and -stable as well. Sorry for the cross-post but I'm getting kind of desperate... Hi all, Since quite a while I have had problems with {CURRENT|RELENG_7} SMP machines that lock up when accessed from a remote location over a vpn (ipsec)

Re: Is it safe to use CPUTYPE?=native on 7.0 ?

2007-12-16 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 12/16/07, Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fairly simple question really - on machines where I never use the compiled > binaries anywhere else, is it O.K. to set the CPU type to 'native' in > make.conf ? According to gcc this should detect the processor type and > set the various flas as

Re: Is it safe to use CPUTYPE?=native on 7.0 ?

2007-12-16 Thread Pete French
> While setting CPUTYPE=native in /etc/make.conf may work, it fails to > set MACHINE_CPU to the correct values for your processor type. > > The problem is that bsd.cpu.mk doesn't know how to handle CPU type 'native'. Ah, O.K. - thats the kind of thing I was worried about... > There is a simple fi

Re: Is it safe to use CPUTYPE?=native on 7.0 ?

2007-12-16 Thread Scot Hetzel
On 12/16/07, Pete French <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > While setting CPUTYPE=native in /etc/make.conf may work, it fails to > > set MACHINE_CPU to the correct values for your processor type. > > > > The problem is that bsd.cpu.mk doesn't know how to handle CPU type 'native'. > > Ah, O.K. - thats t

Re: OS bug in taskq

2007-12-16 Thread Clifton Royston
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 03:58:10PM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 01:03:14PM -0700, Elliot Finley wrote: > > I have: > > dumpdev="AUTO" > > in /etc/rc.conf and: > > ... > > in the kernel and I'm still unable to obtain a crash dump. Hopefully > > there is enough info in th

FreeBSD 7.0beta4 panic on ftp transfer

2007-12-16 Thread Михаил Кипа
SO I have 7.0beta4 on my server. My HDD have such configuration: ad4: 476940MB at ata2-master SATA300 ad6: 476940MB at ata3-master SATA300 ad10: 152627MB at ata5-master SATA150 ad12: 152627MB at ata6-master SATA150 ar0: 476928MB status: READY ar0: disk0 READY (master) using ad4 at ata2-master

Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

2007-12-16 Thread Mark Fullmer
While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot dated November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly degrade network performance every 30.99 seconds. Packets appear to make it as

Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

2007-12-16 Thread Mark Fullmer
While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot dated November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly degrade network performance every 30.99 seconds. Packets appear to make it as

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

2007-12-16 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 12:21:43AM -0500, Mark Fullmer wrote: > While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot dated > November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or > kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly > degrade net

Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

2007-12-16 Thread Mark Fullmer
While trying to diagnose a packet loss problem in a RELENG_6 snapshot dated November 8, 2007 it looks like I've stumbled across a broken driver or kernel routine which stops interrupt processing long enough to severly degrade network performance every 30.99 seconds. Packets appear to make it as

Re: Packet loss every 30.999 seconds

2007-12-16 Thread Mark Fullmer
I'm about 99% sure right now. I'll set this up in a lab tomorrow without an ethernet switch. It takes about a day of uptime before the problem shows up. Sorry for the duplicate messages, I misread a bounce notification. -- mark On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Mon, D

Generation Y - Gerer sans deprimer

2007-12-16 Thread Guide CF
= FORMATION GEN= ERATION Y : RECRUTEMENT ET GESTION RECONCILIER LES GENERATIONS POUR PL= US D'EFFICACITE MÉTHODE P&= Eacute;DAGOGIQUE: Apports méthodologiques, exercices pra= tiques et mises en situation, complétées et enrichies d= e partage d'expér