The machine is down. Don't know why yet.
-Kip
On 10/3/07, Chris H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
> Lately I've been finding it difficult, to impossible to reach freebsd.org.
> (hope this message makes it)
> At any rate, no matter my location; all routes to freebsd.org appear to
> be dea
Am Donnerstag 04 Oktober 2007 08:03:09 schrieb Chris H.:
> Lately I've been finding it difficult, to impossible to reach freebsd.org.
> (hope this message makes it)
Sort of similar from me (from two locations):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ traceroute www.freebsd.org
traceroute to www.freebsd.org (69.147
Chris H. wrote:
Greetings,
Lately I've been finding it difficult, to impossible to reach freebsd.org.
(hope this message makes it)
At any rate, no matter my location; all routes to freebsd.org appear to
be dead.
From my home base, the route to freebsd.org appears to be provided by
Yahoo
# tra
On 10/4/07, Chris H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, and thank you for the reply.
>
> I also can't help but notice that hop count is pretty bad -
> 11 hops and not even to the destination. That's terrible. I usually
> never exceed 7 hops to any destination.
> Anyhow, /really/ looking forward to
Hello,
On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:03:09 -0700
"Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
> Lately I've been finding it difficult, to impossible to reach
> freebsd.org. (hope this message makes it)
I use www.freebsd.org on a regular basis (mailing lists, INDEX fetches,
then Handbook etc) and
Whoo Hoo!
Thanks for the link
:)
Thanks for taking the time to help.
Greatly appreciated!
--Chris
Quoting Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 10/4/07, Chris H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello, and thank you for the reply.
I also can't help but notice that hop count is p
Same from here in Greece.
George
On 10/4/07, Torfinn Ingolfsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:03:09 -0700
> "Chris H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> > Lately I've been finding it difficult, to impossible to reach
> > freebsd.org. (hope this message
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 10:17 +0200, Kim Attree wrote:
> LI Xin wrote:
> > Tom Evans wrote:
> >
> >> Hi stable@, jail@ [jail@ plz cc me as I'm not subscribed]
> >>
> >> I'm having some problems setting up some jails for semi-isolated
> >> development (ie, so we can isolate the developers into a ja
Chris H. wrote:
Hello Kip,
Thanks for the (fast) reply, and info.
Hope the status changes soon. :)
It has been having hardware problems the past few months, as has been
discussed here and on other lists in the past. No need to invoke the
black helicopters about Yahoo's complicity, they conti
Hello Kris, and thank you for your informative reply.
Quoting Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Chris H. wrote:
Hello Kip,
Thanks for the (fast) reply, and info.
Hope the status changes soon. :)
It has been having hardware problems the past few months, as has been
discussed here and on oth
LI Xin wrote:
> Tom Evans wrote:
>
>> Hi stable@, jail@ [jail@ plz cc me as I'm not subscribed]
>>
>> I'm having some problems setting up some jails for semi-isolated
>> development (ie, so we can isolate the developers into a jail, give them
>> all the root access they want, and not worry about
Anyone else seeing make buildworld stop at usr.bin/netstat/ ?
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DIPSEC -DINET6 -DFAST_IPSEC -
Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-
parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -
Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/usr.b
TB --- 2007-10-04 11:20:52 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-10-04 11:20:52 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2007-10-04 11:20:52 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-10-04 11:21:33 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2007-10-04 11:21:33 - cd
Artem Kuchin <> wrote:
> What value of HZ option would you recommend
> for a hosting (web) server with a lot of processes
> (about 900) and polling off (as decided from previous
> discussion polling is useless in
> this situation).
In that case, I would recommend not to override the
default
> >>Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
> >
> >1. Any process, including the kernel can only allocate up to 4 GB of
> >memory on a 32-bit system (since a 32-bit integer can only hold that
> >many values)
> >2. The kernel is further constrained so the user programs can get enough
Ivan Voras wrote:
Stephen Clark wrote:
looking at kmem_suballoc which calls vm_map_find which returns
KERN_NO_SPACE
which is defined as 3.
Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
1. Any process, including the kernel can only allocate up to 4 GB of
memory on a 32-bit
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Artem Kuchin <> wrote:
What value of HZ option would you recommend
for a hosting (web) server with a lot of processes
(about 900) and polling off (as decided from previous
discussion polling is useless in
this situation).
In that case, I would recommend not to override the
5-port (NEC) USB-2.0 PCI card drivers from win98
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Anyone else seeing make buildworld stop at usr.bin/netstat/ ?
I didn't compile. That file was changed yesterday. But by the looks of it,
everybody will be seeing it.
The compiler is right because u_quad_t is not unsigned long long on the amd64,
but only unsigned long, which although being the s
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 03:25:42PM +0200, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> > >>Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
> > >
> > >1. Any process, including the kernel can only allocate up to 4 GB of
> > >memory on a 32-bit system (since a 32-bit integer can only hold that
> > >many values)
>
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
1. Any process, including the kernel can only allocate up to 4 GB of
memory on a 32-bit system (since a 32-bit integer can only hold that
many values)
2. The kernel is further constrained so the user programs can get
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 09:19 -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> >Stephen Clark wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>looking at kmem_suballoc which calls vm_map_find which returns
> >>KERN_NO_SPACE
> >>which is defined as 3.
> >>
> >>Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
> >>
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:32:39PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> In that case, I would recommend not to override the
> default at all (which is 1000).
ISTM that it would be better to use kern.hz=100 in this case.
My reasoning is that a web server shouldn't be terribly sensitive to
latency, so it'
Artem Kuchin wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Artem Kuchin wrote:
> > > What value of HZ option would you recommend
> > > for a hosting (web) server with a lot of processes
> > > (about 900) and polling off (as decided from previous
> > > discussion polling is useless in
> > > this situatio
On 2007-10-02 15:41, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him so
> > > he can catch up with the thread.
> >
> > Which symptoms?
On 10/4/07, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-10-02 15:41, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > "Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > The symptoms were exhibited even with rev. 1.16. I've CC'ed him s
On 2007-10-04 18:05, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10/4/07, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On 2007-10-02 15:41, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>On 10/2/07, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Vlad GALU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The symptom
Craig Boston wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:32:39PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
In that case, I would recommend not to override the
default at all (which is 1000).
ISTM that it would be better to use kern.hz=100 in this case.
My reasoning is that a web server shouldn't be terribly sensitiv
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 19:42:33 +0400
"Artem Kuchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Craig Boston wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 02:32:39PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> >> In that case, I would recommend not to override the
> >> default at all (which is 1000).
> >
> > ISTM that it would be better t
TB --- 2007-10-04 16:25:01 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-stable.sentex.ca
TB --- 2007-10-04 16:25:01 - starting RELENG_6 tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2007-10-04 16:25:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2007-10-04 16:25:37 - checking out the source tree
TB --- 2007-10-04 16:25:37
I get "Fatal double fault" error when writing to a filesystem
mounted from NFS server.
Both NFS server and client are running 6.2-RELEASE-p7.
I've attached dmesg from client and kernel config from server
and client.
Both have same these NFS options in /etc/rc.conf
The basic answer is that HZ is almost, but not quite irrelevant.
If a process blocks another will immediately be scheduled. More
importantly, if an interrupt driven event (keyboard, tty, network,
disk, etc) wakes a process up the scheduler has the ability to force
an IMMEDIATE
Stephen Clark wrote:
Artem Kuchin wrote:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Why would there be no space when I have 24GB of memory?
1. Any process, including the kernel can only allocate up to 4 GB
of memory on a 32-bit system (since a 32-bit integer can only
hold that many values)
2. The kernel is fu
effect. I would not go under 100, though. I personally believe
that a default of 1000 is ridiculously high, especially on a SMP
system.
Nuts! Everybody has his own opinion on this matter.
Any idea how to actually build syntetic but close to real
benchmark for this?
For example:
Usu
Craig Boston wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > In that case, I would recommend not to override the
> > default at all (which is 1000).
>
> ISTM that it would be better to use kern.hz=100 in this case.
I haven't seen a benchmark yet which would support that.
> My reasoning is that a web ser
:Nuts! Everybody has his own opinion on this matter.
:Any idea how to actually build syntetic but close to real
:benchmark for this?
It is literally impossible to write a benchmark to test this, because
the effects you are measuring are primarily scheduling effects related
to the sc
plutao# make
cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DIPSEC -DINET6 -DFAST_IPSEC
-Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/inet.c
/usr/src/usr.bin/netstat/inet.c: I
Carlos Fernando Assis Paniago wrote:
> plutao# make
> cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DIPSEC -DINET6 -DFAST_IPSEC
> -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
> -Wno-uninitialized -c /usr/src/usr.bin/netstat
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Artem Kuchin wrote:
Hello!
What value of HZ option would you recommend for a hosting (web) server
with a lot of processes (about 900) and polling off (as decided from
previous discussion polling is useless in this situation).
Is this an SMP system? If so you'd probably b
39 matches
Mail list logo
